C
contemplative
Guest
People of the Ethical Treatment of Animals supports Pope Benedict XVI
goveg.com/feat/PopeBenedictXVI/popeletter.pdf
Comments?
goveg.com/feat/PopeBenedictXVI/popeletter.pdf
Comments?
geezerbob
Who cares?
I care geez’o, so why don’t you?Scott_Lafrance
PWEETA supports him too.
Don’t you care geez’o, about what it is that God respects?“[W]e can see that they are given into our care, that we cannot just do whatever we want with them. Animals, too, are God’s creatures, and even if they do not have the same direct relation to God that man has, they are still creatures of His will, creatures we must respect as companions in creation and as important elements in the creation.”
Are you FOR the suffering of animals, geez’o and Laff?As a Catholic who tries to honor all of God’s creation every day, I most respectfully ask for your support in our efforts to reduce the suffering of animals used for food. Would you please encourage people to consider the suffering of animals by lending a supportive word to our efforts?
Yours in Christ, Bruce Friedrich
Director
Are you opposed to the words/teachings of St. Francis, geez’o and Laff?As St. Francis said, “All creatures are created from the same paternal heartbeat of God. Not to hurt our humble brethren is our first duty to them, but to stop here is not enough. We have a higher mission—to be of service to them wherever they require it.”
Thanks for the link. It’s nice to see that at least they aren’t attacking the Pope. It’s also nice to know that there are still some folks around who aren’t so rotted by selfishness that they can still spare a thought for animals.People of the Ethical Treatment of Animals supports Pope Benedict XVI
goveg.com/feat/PopeBenedictXVI/popeletter.pdf
Comments?

Sure. Just as we can count on seeing lots of pro-lifers turning up at PETA functions.They say that “they believe animals, like people,have a sacred right to life and need to be protected from violence.”
So we should be seeing lots of PETA people at pro-life functions right?
I am 99.99% sure that Benedict XVI is not a vegetarian. I’ve heard that he likes hearty German food – presumably that would include meat.Thanks for the link. It’s nice to see that at least they aren’t attacking the Pope. It’s also nice to know that there are still some folks around who aren’t so rotted by selfishness that they can still spare a thought for animals.
Personally I can’t stand arrogant carnivores.
![]()
Easy there Laff, It would seem that you might have a few issues of your own to get over my friend.Scott_Lafrance
To all you anti-omnivore, please get over your self-righeousness.
True.Jesus Christ celebrated the Passover meal with the Apostles, so it is assumed that he ate lamb.
Once again, True.It is also well known that he ate fish.
Your on a roll there Laff … good work!There is nothing Scriptural supporting Veganism being more morally righteous than omnivorism.
Yes, but I havn’t read anywhere on this thread where anybody has stated that they don’t actually eat meat (myself included). But what we (and PETA, and then Card. Ratzinger) ARE SAYING is this: That torturing an animal to death before we use it for our consumption IS NOT A MORALLY CHRISTIAN ACT.I agree that we are required to be good stewards of the resources God has bestowed on us, this includes our “animal friends”.
more than a few. Ask anyoneEasy there Laff, It would seem that you might have a few issues of your own to get over my friend.
I agree, but I haven’t seen anyone here condoning or encouraging the torture of animals. Some of us eat meat, and don’t appreciate it when Vegans accuse us of being unChristian and that we are responsible for the torture of said animals.Yes, but I havn’t read anywhere on this thread where anybody has stated that they don’t actually eat meat (myself included). But what we (and PETA, and then Card. Ratzinger) ARE SAYING is this: That torturing an animal to death before we use it for our consumption IS NOT A MORALLY CHRISTIAN ACT.
That I believe, is the point of this thread.
Yes, but PETA would take it further than either the Holy Father or (I think) you, Frank, in that they also say that animals cannot be raised for their fur. I don’t think anyone advocates cruelty to animals, but to say that we cannot wear their skins seems to go against a long human/Judeo-Christian tradition, which allowed it. Should they be treated humanely before they are harvested, for whatever legitimate reason? To be sure! I don’t eat veal because it creeps me out, foiegras for the same reason.Yes, but I havn’t read anywhere on this thread where anybody has stated that they don’t actually eat meat (myself included). But what we (and PETA, and then Card. Ratzinger) ARE SAYING is this: That torturing an animal to death before we use it for our consumption IS NOT A MORALLY CHRISTIAN ACT.
That I believe, is the point of this thread.
There is some humanely raised veal available, but it’s generally hard to find outside of the very largest cities, and is more costly.To be sure! I don’t eat veal because it creeps me out,
I agree. I’m very pleased to see our Holy Father has progressive and compassionate thinking on this important matter. I agree with him regarding the treatment of animals by the factory farm mentality.Thanks for the link. It’s nice to see that at least they aren’t attacking the Pope. It’s also nice to know that there are still some folks around who aren’t so rotted by selfishness that they can still spare a thought for animals.
Personally I can’t stand arrogant carnivores.
![]()
Unfortunately, the downfall of PETA is that they place a higher premium on the lives of animals than they do human life. THAT is a mortal sin.I agree. I’m very pleased to see our Holy Father has progressive and compassionate thinking on this important matter. I agree with him regarding the treatment of animals by the factory farm mentality.
Yes, PETA has some people who are over the edge regarding animal rights. But that does not detract from their core message, which I support. The United States is particularly uncaring regarding the treatment of livestock.