J
JReducation
Guest
Actually, bishops in Europe and Latin America have reported an increase. Maybe it’s not the pope. Maybe it’s Americans.
This could certainly be the case in those places, I don’t know. But American Church representatives have been reporting this effect, and apparently it isn’t true. For example Card Dolan:Actually, bishops in Europe and Latin America have reported an increase. Maybe it’s not the pope. Maybe it’s Americans.
Where were the cheers when the Latin Mass was reinstated and people came back to confession, etc., because of that?Really? Wow! Congratulations!:bounce::yup::clapping:
Thank you!Really? Wow! Congratulations!:bounce::yup::clapping:
Agreed… we’ve learned in 50 years the new ways aint working so it’s time to go back to the ways of old! Psychologists like to tell us how bad it is to scare people into thinking they’re doing wrong in life by sinning but how come 50 years ago when people were told they were doing wrong there were far less psychological problems?You’d think, after 50 yrs, we would have learned that being soft and cuddly isn’t the way to get people back in the Church. If it was the Anglicans would be doing much better than they are. Instead we see Muslim Fundamentalists on the rise and they are the least cuddly of any religion. Why are they doing so well? There’s probably several reasons, but that they take their religion seriously, as something important, might be the key.
Before having a parish council willing to assist with recruitment and retention, you need a priest who is willing to lead the parish church’s evangelization efforts.Correct. It also helps to start at the Parish level. You need a strong pro-active Parish Council willing to assist with ideas for recruitment and retention of the faithful.
Americans have a very arrogant attitude toward religion, not just Catholicism. Americans don’t like anything they can’t control. While Europeans and Latin Americans drift away from the Church because it does not meet their needs, millions of Americans never move toward organized religion of any kind, because it interferes with their “manifest destiny” as they have defined it for themselves. The idea that man’s destiny is defined for him by an eternal God is not democratic.My thoughts exactly. We Americans are notoriously resistant to authority, even when it’s for their own objective good.
There are a number of reasons why I don’t trust the study.This could certainly be the case in those places, I don’t know. But American Church representatives have been reporting this effect, and apparently it isn’t true. For example Card Dolan:
ncregister.com/blog/joan-desmond/cardinal-dolan-on-the-francis-effect
cbsnews.com/news/cardinal-dolan-the-pope-francis-effect-is-everywhere/
I don’t have links, but I know Archbp. Kurtz has said the same things, as well as other Bishops etc.
Now obviously I don’t expect the Bishops to be counting mass goes and making pie charts and such. But I think 's fair to say that the American Church has been asserting that a “Francis effect” is happening here in America. Perhaps they’re just mistaken, or maybe in their diocese there is an effect that isn’t happening elsewhere or something.
But in Europe or Latin America, they would be reading Card Dolan’s comments and saying, “the US Bishops are reporting increased mass attendence due to the Francis Effect” etc. just like we here are saying about them.
Br JR, I’m not even sure this is true anymore, unless they expand the parish boundaries to Hispanics, etc.Today, most Catholic kids attend private schools or public. Most parishes don’t require a registration to receive the sacraments. They require an address within the parish boundaries.
This is called an anecdote. And the plural of anecdotes is not evidence.There are dioceses where the numbers of people going to confession and mass has increased during the second half of the year. In my own diocese, we had one parish report 500 confessions during Holy Week, just after Francis’ election.
Call it anything you want. We who work with chanceries record these numbers as facts, not anecdotes. I mention this particular parish, because I was struck by the number when it came past my desk, not because it was the only parish that reported an increase in confessions.This is called an anecdote. And the plural of anecdotes is not evidence.Others, including CAF’ers can point to opposite anecdotes in their dioceses.
Anecdotes, unless verified into a trend, tend to cancel each other out.
All this focus on Pope Francis instead of the Churches universal truth makes me really uncomfortable. It’s risen to the level of a cult of personality for some people IMO. Popes serve the Church for a very short time. I think we would be better served focusing on the truth of the Churches teachings and salvation in Jesus Christ instead of how popular the Pope is.
Me as well. But this is the 7th Pope I’ve lived through and certain things don’t change, especially in the first few months of each Papacy, where the effects of a new Papacy are tested. Much of the talk is among non-Catholics as well, if not mostly. Bottom line is what you correctly point out or imply, that it is still God’s church and our salvation is what’s tantamount. I’ll certainly miss the EF if it’s taken away again, but our comfort level in the secular world is secondary.All this focus on Pope Francis instead of the Churches universal truth makes me really uncomfortable.
I’ll call reports from both sides anecdotal until I see trends. I certainly don’t distrust your word, in fact I appreciate it, but neither do I distrust the words of others on the ground.Call it anything you want.
I believe that you don’t know to which CAF’ers I’m referring, because I haven’t named them, nor do I believe they identify as a “group.” I wouldn’t want to judge my fellow Catholics, so I tend to take the words of all others, including yours, at face value, because we are told to so as an aspect of charity.Now see, the particular group of CAFers to whom you’re referring is the last group of people whom I would trust with such reports. .