A
adrift
Guest
Yes this is off topic and a subject that should not be continued since it really involves a grave sin.Adrift & Insight
Would you like to start a new thread please, you are off topic here.
Yes this is off topic and a subject that should not be continued since it really involves a grave sin.Adrift & Insight
Would you like to start a new thread please, you are off topic here.
I’m not sure what you mean by off topic, could you explain a little further. I looked over your website, it looks great! Do you agree with strictly voting Pro-Life?
There is no sin in obeying Canon Law, by abiding by Pope Pius XII’s statement. However, there is real grave sin in immersing oneself in books about witchcraft, such as those by J.K. Rowling, who freely admitted her books are anti-Catholic and Satanic. Eliza stated: “The sheep will know the Master’s voice”. If you could clear your mind of this satanic literature in which you are engrossed, then perhaps you would see God’s finger in these works. Like Saul, the scales may fall from your eyes.
By Jonathan Baker
Saturday, 21 April 2007
Article Index
In Defense of The Poem of the Man-God
This author is correct and states my position although we come to opposite positions. We tend to get away from the relevant part. Is it from a supernatural source? Another quote from this article is relevant to this question.The truth of the matter is that none of this is relevant to discerning the genuineness of Maria Valtorta’s revelations. Whether those responsible always did exactly what they should have done is immaterial to whether The Poem is legitimate. They were human as we are, and we all make errors in judgment and, yes, even sin. All the apparent conflict between the Holy Office and the publishers had nothing to do with Maria Valtorta herself, who was bedridden through it all. If they were supposed to have an Imprimatur they should have gotten one. If Fr. Berti made a promise not to publish it he should have kept it, and if Mr. Pisani knew about that he should not have printed the book. Yet all this is still irrelevant as to the authenticity of The Poem. Again, I do not concede that that these points are true, only that if they are they still bring us no closer to resolving the issue.
The present Pope has also spoken to this in 1993In the light of the recent recurrance (sic) of interest in the work, the Congregation has come to the conclusion that a further clarification to the “Notes” previously issued is now in order. Thus it has directed a particular request to the Italian Bishops’ Conference to contact the publishing house which is concerned with the distribution of the writings in Italy in order to see to it that in any future reissue of the work “it might be clearly indicated from the very first page that the ‘visions’ and ‘dictations’ referred to in it are simply the literary forms used by the author to narrate in her own way the life of Jesus. They cannot be considered supernatural in origin.”
So we can stop arguing over imprimaturs that only mean it can be written. We can stop arguing if there are errors because we are not the one to decide if it is supernatural that it the Church’s job and so far it is negative. Could it change. Yes. But until it does, it should be regard as fiction in obedience to the Church. Oh before someone jumps on this and twist it. What you believe privately is not disobedience but it should not be promoted in a that way publicly.“The ‘visions’ and ‘dictations’ referred to in the work, “The Poem of the
Man-God,” are simply the literary forms used by the author to narrate in
her own way the life of Jesus. They cannot be considered supernatural in
origin.”
WOW where did this come from.Hi Eileen T,
Hi Adrift,
God BlessCode:There is no sin in obeying Canon Law, by abiding by Pope Pius XII’s statement. However, there is real grave sin in immersing oneself in books about witchcraft, such as those by J.K. Rowling, who freely admitted her books are anti-Catholic and Satanic. Eliza stated: “The sheep will know the Master’s voice”. If you could clear your mind of this satanic literature in which you are engrossed, then perhaps you would see God’s finger in these works. Like Saul, the scales may fall from your eyes.
This is going to be my last post as I believe everything and every ones position is clear.
I like Harry Potter. I have reservations about it and what is bad about it has been clearly stated. It is a shame that those objections are met with derision rather than reasoned discussion. I felt uneasy about some of the plot. I did not like the whole class of divination. It may bother me because when I was a teenager a friend got deeply involved with this type of thing. Some Demonic things happened around her. It was very scary and very sad. I never knew what happened to her. Could this book lead others to experiment with this stuff? I don’t know. The book does put the spin that there is little to it and I liked that about the book. However, it also indicated that sometimes it was true. I like that about the book. What I didn’t like was that this was considered the tools of the trade. That it may not be believable but it was acceptable which it is not.
One more incident in the series which surprisingly no one has mentioned, Mrs. Weasley upon learning her family is safe says “Thank God”. It strikes me that no one comments on it because this is regarded as a line we say all the time without really meaning it.
I don’t understand why this cannot be discussed without being attacked. It might have been enlightening. There are those who have been so acid in there comments which really under mind all that they have to say and they were so bad that I have put them on the ignore list.
To sum it up. This is not a book for children. The priest was right in pulling it from the library. Parents should be vigilant in the education of their children. When mine were young, I taped the show they liked and previewed them. They didn’t get to see everything they would have liked. That was my duty as a parent. I also kept from them books that I thought would endanger their soul. Judy Blume was one author that they could not read. There were other books that were equally enjoyable to them. God Bless to you all.
The "Nihil Obstat" and "Imprimatur" are official declarations that a book or pamphlet is free of doctrinal or moral error. No implication is contained therein that those who have granted the Nihil Obstat and the Imprimatur **agree with the content, opinions or statements expressed. **
Everything I have heard her say is that it was not demonic of course you tend to quote out of context.And here is the kicker, although J.K. Rowling freely admitted her books are anti-Catholic and Satanic, you assert: “I don’t understand why this cannot be discussed without being attacked.” Yet, it seems to be your mission in life to attack those reading the Poem.
Steve Jost has a copy of the Poem from India, complete with Archbishop Soosa Pakiam’s Imprimatur and Vatican seal. He personally shown it to Father Mitch Pacwa, “It looked like his eyes were going to pop out of his head. He then changed the topic and could say nothing further on it.”
NIHIL OBSTAT
“nothing stands in the way”
IMPRIMATUR
“let it be printed”
The “Nihil Obstat” and “Imprimatur” are official declarations that a book or pamphlet is free of doctrinal or moral error. No implication is contained therein that those who have granted the Nihil Obstat and the Imprimatur agree with the content, opinions or statements expressed.
An imprimatur is a moot argument. The Church ruling is that it is fiction. I accept it as fiction. An imprimatur does not mean that it is not fiction.An Imprimatur does not mean that a book is an official text of the Church. It’s not the approval of the work by the Pope or a dogmatic Council, and it’s not a stamp of infallibility. It doesn’t even mean that everything in the book is accurate, only that there is nothing in it that contradicts Catholic dogma.
None of this changes the fact that it is fiction.Bishop Roman Danylak gave both, a “Nihil Obstat” and “Imprimatur”.
Catherine Zeppa Di Matteo wrote a letter to Valtorta.com,
"Radio Maria in Italy has been presenting the works of Maria Valtorta for many years. Their nation-wide listening public in Italy is around 3 million strong, and both Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict have made very public their support, appreciation and encouragement for this excellent and punctiliously faithful Catholic radio station. There are many Cardinals and Bishops who participate on a regular basis, and this certainly would not happen if there were even just a hint of something controversial in any of the many program offerings. The founder and president of the radio station is Padre (Father) Livio Fanzaga. He himself was once skeptical about the works of Maria Valtorta (I don’t know what it was though that convinced him). Anyhow, Radio Maria is pretty much all over the globe now, and in the course of some 25 years, the Vatican and two popes have found nothing at all to criticize about the many programs that have been devoted to the works of Maria Valtorta. Radio Maria is tremendously influential among the faithful, and for this reason, the Vatican for sure keeps a close eye and attentive ear on the radio’s programming. But it must be said that even in the Vatican, Radio Maria is as popular and well-loved as in any other place in Italy.
Catherine Zeppa Di Matteo of Latisana (UD), Italy
MAY 6,1992. Archbishop Dionigi Tettamanzi, in his capacity as Secretary General of the Italian Bishops’ Conference, wrote to the publisher Emilio Pisani to request that 'in the event the volumes are reprinted, it be clearly stated at the outset that the ‘visions’ and ‘dictations’ related therein may not be considered to possess a supernatural origin, but must simply be deemed literary forms of which the author has made use to narrate the life of Jesus in her own way."
Taken out of context. Demonic activity is something the Church considers when ruling on these cases. So when it is askedAt least there seems to be some progress, your terminology seems to be shifting from demonic activity and grave sin to fiction.
that has to be a consideration.Where did Maria Valtorta get all these names?
No matter their opinions. The Church’s ruling is that it is fiction.As far as fact or fiction is concerned, one can consider:
Red herrings but I am curious why do you believe that because it is in the Congressional Library it authenticates it? Why did you ignore that it also has the fake Jesuit oath in it? Since it is a library, it has a lot of fiction in it.There are three entirely separate eyewitness descriptions that confirm this, one authenticated by The United States Congressional Library and another dates back to 5 BC (± 50yrs accuracy). The third by Publius Lentrelus. Not to mention the most recent analysis of the shroud.
Wow - so, adrift, are you one who thinks that the Shroud might not be of Jesus? I have read books and articles by Shroud experts, not only the ones on television – which like to present it as a maybe/maybe not - because they never want to make a difinitive “probably yes” for religion. And I think its qutie a stretch to say its not. My faith says yes.Considering that the Shroud is still debated as being the burial cloth of Jesus and that you have only ONE person who Speculates this is not very good confirmation.
http://www.latinmass.bravepages.com/images/Holy%20Face%20of%20Jesus02.jpgWow - he certainly does not sound fictitious to me.The article refers Pontius Pilate’s letter to the Emperor Claudius, but doesn’t address the letter to Tiberius Caesar. The Archko dates back to 5BC.
Here’s a link to the fictitious Publius Lentulus, although it would more likely been his son:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publius_Cornelius_Lentulus_Spinther