Pope Examines Why Latin American Catholics Join Evangelical Churches

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catholic_Press
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Not only does he talk about making the liturgy and Catholic community more welcoming, but also about catechesis for the young, and solidarity with the entire church including the poor.

I know that I am not the Pope for a very good reason, but I cannot help but wish that our Bishops would truly pay attention to this. I humbly believe that if we can fix those things everything else will fall into place with little effort. And until we fix them all of our efforts against abortion and the like will fail.
 
hmmmm…

As an unbaptized soul, I joined the Church as a teenager (soley by the grace of God) and my joy and fervor came from an absolute belief that the Eucharist was the Lord. Back in those days, there were no hospitality ministers, and to boot, I was the only one in my rather pagan family that converted. I went to Church by myself because my Godparents lived too far away to take me so there was no sense of community either.

I like the practical advice, tho, and completely agree that catechesis is the key. I wonder if the Neo-Cat program would be beneficial to these Latinos because it appears (from what I’ve heard) to offer everything the Holy Father mentions.
 
Pope Benedict XVI believes that Catholics who convert to evangelical Christianity often do so because they experience a lack of fervor, joy and community within Catholic parishes – rather than for doctrinal reasons.
This is, unfortunately, something the so-called Traditionalist wing likes to ignore or pretend that it’s not a problem.

There are many people who seem to be of the mindset that “I go to Mass, I don’t need to talk to anyone there or anything”. The reason we get together on Sundays is to worship as a community. People seem to discount that or think that it’s not important.

Most parishes (and even diocese) don’t seem to pay much attention to young adults especially. Spiritually speaking, one size does not fit all. Here in Canada, the diocese that have good young adult groups are by and large the ones that have CCO involved (CCO is a university-age led Catholic group endorsed by the bishops, and Bl. John Paul II, that is fairly charismatic).

We we need to look at is doing more stuff outside of Mass. There’s nothing wrong with having gatherings during the week (or even on Sunday before/after Mass) for different types of worship or bible studies or faith studies or lectio divina or many other things. What we’re really missing is good leaders (especially young adult leaders) and priests/parishes willing to encourage them.

In older times, parishes use to be focal points of the entire community. For most Catholic churches, that’s just not the case anymore.
 
As a recent convert to the faith who came from a friendly Methodist church with great music I totally agree with the Holy Father. I came to the Church for the truth and have never been more at peace. But I have many Catholic friends who now worship at non demoninational churches and they are doing so for the community, praise and worship, and Bible studies which they feel the Church they attended was lacking. I feel such a call to somehow be a bridge in the divide as I am “multicultural” so to speak but as a new convert still not sure how to do that. I would love to see more opportunities for charismatic praise and worship maybe (our archdiocese has a Charismatic movement, but none of the parishes near me have anything like that) and more Bible study opportunities which our parish has been trying to get going. I don’t know where to go with this and I love the reverence of the Mass itself and am a daily attender, but I think these sorts of things in addition might bring in some younger people. I am struggling to find my place with all of this but it has been on my heart and am glad to see it is on the Holy Father’s as well- bring on the new evangilization!

Blessings,

Val
 
What Catholics Can Learn From Evangelicals

stjohn17v20-21.com/evangl01.htm
The first area Catholics must reclaim is the principle of holiness, not just for the clergy and religious, but for every believer. Evangelicals understand that an encounter with the living Christ means they must be set apart for him. This means living a life radically committed to the Savior - simply being a “respectable” person is not an adequate answer to the call for holiness.
The second area where Catholics can learn from Evangelicals is how to evangelize. Catholics are way behind Evangelicals in this discipline. Our sluggishness in evangelizing is indicative of a spiritual malaise.
Flowing from their desire to spread the gospel, Evangelicals also try to appeal to people through a rational defense of the faith. A trip to your local Evangelical bookstore will turn up books defending the veracity of the Scriptures, the historical credibility of the resurrection of Christ, and reasoned defenses of the Christian faith which answer objections from both atheists and cultists.
At one time, Catholics too had a great number of apologetical works but now there is a dearth of such materials. Unfortunately, some of the contemporary books that are written to explain the Catholic faith are all too willing to concede that Scripture has errors in it or they are afraid to defend the Church’s teaching on controversial issues.
On the positive side, a number of apologetic works, mostly defending the Church against Protestant objections, have been produced recently in response to the hunger the Catholic laity have to know and defend their faith. One truly outstanding example of this has been the apologetics tapes that have been produced by three former Evangelical ministers, Scott Hahn, Gerry Matatics, and Steve Woods. These tapes provide a refreshing biblical explanation of the Catholic Faith which every Catholic should become familiar with. Also, a number of classic works in apologetics have been reprinted. However, much work still remains to be done. The majority of apologetic books currently available adequately handle basic objections. What is needed are works which go deeper to answer the most sophisticated objections from Evangelicals, atheists, and non-Christian groups. Catholic theologians, philosophers, and scientists would be doing their brothers and sisters in the faith a disservice if they fail to respond to the need for solid defenses of the Catholic faith.
A third area where we can learn from our Evangelical brothers and sisters is their love for Sacred Scripture. It is true that the Catholic Church is the true “Bible Church,” that our doctrine faithfully transmits the full gospel as taught in Scripture, and that our liturgy is soaked with Scripture. However, it is also true that the scriptural knowledge of too many Catholics is poor and thin. Evangelicals on the other hand have a reputation for being well versed in the Bible which enables them to quickly demonstrate their beliefs from Scripture. Also, since the Bible is God’s Word, which is “living and effective, sharper than any two-edged sword,” reading and meditating on it gives devout Evangelicals a biblical spirituality and holiness which is truly attractive to non-believers
The fourth area Catholics can improve is in our knowledge of ourselves as brothers and sisters in the Lord. Evangelical churches are frequently warm and friendly places where strangers are welcome and where efforts are made for the members of the congregation to fellowship with one another. In many Catholic churches, on the other hand, the parishioners dash to the parking lot after Mass with hardly a word. These same parishes may lack programs where Catholics can fellowship in small groups such as Bible studies or faith sharing groups. With their friendliness, it is no surprise that many Evangelical churches are growing, sometimes at the expense of “cold” Catholic parishes.
 
A few years ago I read the book, "Teacher Man, " by Frank McCourt, an Irish born Catholic, more infamous for his book, “Angela’s Ashes.”

Anyway, on his trip over to Ireland, he met an Evangelical and had some conversation with him. The man shared his faith in Jesus Christ and the Bible, and asked Frank if he was saved and all the usual.

Anyway, one night Frank walked up on deck and saw the Evangelcal standing at the railing, praying. He was looking up to the sky and praising God and thanking him for everything he was blessed with.

Frank thought to himself for a minute and asked himself, if the ship were to suddenly begin to sink, this man would be singing divine praises to God, while himself a Catholic, would be running around the ship looking for a priest to give him Last Rites.

This is the difference which draws people away from the Church. We’re not a Church which preaches Jesus Christ and hope in our salvation through him, so much as we preach how few of us will make it to heaven because we are sinners and deserve hell fire and will probably end up there because we’re not holy enough.

If you doubt me, go over the Spiritual Forum and read some of the threads recently posted.

Jim
 
The failure to share the good news is daunting for the Catholic church.It will take a huge change in perception and practice to change this.

It’s not just Latin ASmerica.

Decades ago there were a handful of Chritians in Nepal. literally. Less than 100. The state religion, Buddhism, prohibited any evangelizing.

The Chritians taught in remote schools and such. The catholics followed the no evangelization rule to a te. The evangelicals shared when they could and went out of their way to spread the faith below the radar.

Shift to today. No formal state religion. There are a million Christans. Of those just 10,000 or so are Christian. The other 900,000 plus evangelical.

This is a massive problem for the Catholic church this century.
 
I feel like it is related to: Poorly Formed Catholics Biggest Obstacle to New Evangelization. I don’t know one truly devout Catholic, yet I know Evangelicals who appear to be more zealous and are more outspoken. It is saddening. 😦
 
I guess some of this partly depends on how one defines (or experiences) “joy,” “fervor,” and “community.” I find all three abundantly in the Roman Catholic Church.

I am also reminded of what my college roommate once told me. She was engaged to a Presbyterian in seminary training, and in their religious encounters had met a number of evangelicals. She said that what she observed over a period of time was that their very fervor was quite dependent on, and drew from, emotion. When things were going well (in their lives, or in their perception of religion as impacting those lives), they continued to be very fervent and convicted. When the bottom fell out, they were like fair-weather friends. What troubled my roommate was the lack of independent faith/conviction, despite the appearance of grandiose enthusiasm: it didn’t last. It was not built on the theological virtues of faith/hope/charity, but rather on feelings. (In her opinion, with considerably more direct experience with that whole branch of Protestantism than I had at the time.)

If joy is defined as certain kinds of music and spontaneous, audible bursts of passion, then I guess we Catholics are “joyless.” 😉 But of course, theologically, joy is not defined as outward excitability.

I think this is more a matter of differences in cultural taste. The moment any parish I attend imports an “evangelical” flavor in some patronizing attempt to meet an assumed 'demand," is the moment I will retreat to recognizably Catholic parishes.

As to community, I continue to maintain that it’s up to the individual to make & discover community. You don’t have to be an extrovert to do so. Showing up for parish events, joining a group as a participant/follower, — there are many ways to experience community in a Catholic setting, even though that is not necessarily during worship. (If that’s what people want, and place as a priority, they should in fact seek faith traditions whose worship involves fellowship.)
 
We need hispanic priests to minister to our hispanic brothers and sisters. Certainly, non-hispanic priests do an excellent job but folks will respond best and be drawn to a priest who shares their culture.

The Spanish speaking Church has a beautiful, centuries old, vibrant life. We don’t need to copy the methods of low church Evangelicals. Hispanic Catholics can find their faith in their own faith tradition not through a largely Caucasian, Protestant faith system which is alien to their history.

I just wish that Evangelicals would keep their paws off our faithful. :mad:
 
I feel like it is related to: Poorly Formed Catholics Biggest Obstacle to New Evangelization. I don’t know one truly devout Catholic, yet I know Evangelicals who appear to be more zealous and are more outspoken. It is saddening. 😦
Well said.

These complaints seem to be about how can we make the Catholic church “more colourful” More like the evangelist.

If someone leaves the true church its not because we lack anything we have the Eucharist
Its because of on their part they lack faith.

They prefer a more entertaining way of worship.

You either accept the truth or you dont.

Contrary to popular belief God is not a democracy

Something that was once rightly condemned as heresy cannot later become truth
 
If someone leaves the true church its not because we lack anything we have the Eucharist Its because of on their part they lack faith.

They prefer a more entertaining way of worship.
Well, they may prefer a more expressive way of worship, but I agree that if the style of worship is being substituted for the content, the validity, and the Truth of the worship, then a choice is being made for something inferior. And that choice does not require us to adopt a different style of worship in some desperate, misguided effort to retain unconvicted followers.

And I agree that there are plenty of Hispanic Masses and Hispanic parishes which cater to cultural preferences. So i.m.o. the business about the style of worship is a baseless excuse.

It has been discussed elsewhere (on much earlier threads) that the “community” being referred to often has more to do with language and recency of immigration (and the need to establish local roots with a visible population), than with the supposed lack of community in any Roman Catholic Church with a significant Hispanic presence.
 
As to community, I continue to maintain that it’s up to the individual to make & discover community.
No. Building community requires at least one other person who wants to build with you.

I’ve attended Mass in many parishes on three continents and I can honestly say that none of them seemed to give two figs if I was there or not. From my college parish - situated in town home to a university with more than 40,000 students - that did not have one ministry geared towards young adults, to my current parish - that hasn’t managed to even get my family enrolled despite numerous attempts on our part to d so - I’ve found a decided lack of interest on the part of anyone at any of them in community building.

I long, long ago resigned myself to parish life as reception of sacraments with a bunch of strangers, too many of whom can’t manage a smile much less express any kind of outward manifestation of joy. Friendship, sense of community, the “human touch” - that stuff I find anywhere and everywhere but a Catholic parish.

Luna
 
I long, long ago resigned myself to parish life as reception of sacraments with a bunch of strangers, too many of whom can’t manage a smile much less express any kind of outward manifestation of joy. Friendship, sense of community, the “human touch” - that stuff I find anywhere and everywhere but a Catholic parish.

Luna
Oh, that’s not fair. Yes, some parishes aren’t as welcoming as they could be but many are- you just have to put yourself out there.

My local Maronite church (I am Latin but go there b/c it’s close) have been really friendly and help me out when they see how lost I am in trying to follow along in the worship aid booklet.

What I’m saying is that it’s not a Catholic problem- it’s a “people” problem.
 
Well said.

These complaints seem to be about how can we make the Catholic church “more colourful” More like the evangelist.

If someone leaves the true church its not because we lack anything we have the Eucharist
Its because of on their part they lack faith.

They prefer a more entertaining way of worship.

You either accept the truth or you dont.

Contrary to popular belief God is not a democracy

Something that was once rightly condemned as heresy cannot later become truth
You see, this is the problem we’re seeing. Certain people seem to think that it’s a dichotomy, you can have your community or you have the True Church and be satisfied with what you get.

Why can’t we have both? Why can’t we as Catholics try and build more community around our churches?
Oh, that’s not fair. Yes, some parishes aren’t as welcoming as they could be but many are- you just have to put yourself out there.
But it’s not easy when no one has any ambition to do anything. You can look through the bulletins of our churches and most of the time you’re not going to see anything for parish get togethers.
I’ve attended Mass in many parishes on three continents and I can honestly say that none of them seemed to give two figs if I was there or not. From my college parish - situated in town home to a university with more than 40,000 students - that did not have one ministry geared towards young adults, to my current parish - that hasn’t managed to even get my family enrolled despite numerous attempts on our part to d so - I’ve found a decided lack of interest on the part of anyone at any of them in community building.

I long, long ago resigned myself to parish life as reception of sacraments with a bunch of strangers, too many of whom can’t manage a smile much less express any kind of outward manifestation of joy. Friendship, sense of community, the “human touch” - that stuff I find anywhere and everywhere but a Catholic parish.
I can back up what Luna’s saying from the other side of the equation. I worked closely with Campus Ministry at my university and was involved with a student-led Catholic group. We put on events, - talks, socials, dances, free food - and we tried nearly everything, but people don’t come out. Most events were lucky to get 10-15 people (there is a last-chance student Mass that is very well attended, at least a 100 people every week in a small chapel, and several dozen more that hang around our small college) to show up.

It is not that people aren’t trying because they are. The problem is systematic: Catholics could care less about the other people they see at Mass. That’s why it seems so cold and unfriendly, everyone’s just there to get their sacrament and punch their card. Catechizing Catholics is a good step (in my experience, people more informed tend to be more involved), but nobody seems to have a good suggestion on how exactly we do that (important distinction: The homily is not a lecture. Mass is not class) when people have no interest in getting involved in the first place (it’s a bit of a catch-22).
 
No. Building community requires at least one other person who wants to build with you.
I have yet to observe that those who seek community in a Catholic parish fail to find it. Our experiences differ. I have found that if I want to create community for others, it’s up to me to start it, and to stop whining or feeling resentful that others can’t read my mind that I want it, or can’t read the minds of others who want it. Yes, I think there are a lot of people who keep to themselves (maybe most people do), but should I be the one complaining about that, I have only myself to blame, as I have never been turned away when engaging others. Most people are not self-starters (including in secular settings), and most people are also not that smooth about sincerity and ease of communication with stangers. That doesn’t make them evil people; it makes them typical.

Unusual is the person who can start a conversation effortlessly with a complete stranger so that the stranger actually is drawn to that person and wants to talk. It’s an art, and some people have a gift for that, but it is not that common.

I’ve also found that many people in parishes – priests will say probably most people attending Mass, anyway – are very preoccupied with genuine heartaches or anxieties; very often those loom large and (again) those people don’t reach out because they are in greater need of having others reach out to them. (My point exactly.)

Some of the most frequent Mass attendees are those in deep suffering or crisis. Hmm. I wonder why? I look out at the congregation and I do see a lot of troubled faces among the minority of happier faces. So it’s up to me to approach them; not them to approach me. Also, I think there’s some rash judging going on on this thread. Just because people look as if they “don’t care” does not mean that they don’t. (A) They could be preoccupied or distracted with overwhelming needs of their own. (B) They’re collecting themselves interiorly and they’re praying, seriously. (Wait, what a concept: In front of the Blessed Sacrament? Who knew? 🤷)
 
Catholics could care less about the other people they see at Mass. That’s why it seems so cold and unfriendly, everyone’s just there to get their sacrament and punch their card.
Yeah, just like Carol Kane’s character said (was it Allison Porchnik) in Woody Allen’s movie, either Play It Again, Sam, or Annie Hall: “I love being reduced to a cultural stereotype.”

What exactly gives you any right to make an all-embracing comment on the interior dispositions of your fellow Catholic brothers and sisters, as if you could read minds and hearts?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top