Pope expresses shame for Christian violence in history

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dale_M
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Are you saying that Pope Benedict shouldn’t have done this? 🤷
I believe this fellow Protestant poster stated eloquently my thoughts on the subject. Moreover, it becomes quite bothersome when members of the clergy I know bring up a supportive viewpoint of Martin Luther, yet I guess that’s just another attribute of the modern Church apologizing for all past ‘transgressions’ in order for the world to embrace it.
I don’t understand why some feel like they need to apologize for the Cursades. If it wasn’t for the first three Crusades all of Europe would be under Sharia law right now, and America probably wouldn’t exist as it does today.
But yeah I really like this pope and I’m protestant.
 
I believe this fellow Protestant poster stated eloquently my thoughts on the subject. Moreover, it becomes quite bothersome when members of the clergy I know bring up a supportive viewpoint of Martin Luther, yet I guess that’s just another attribute of the modern Church apologizing for all past ‘transgressions’ in order for the world to embrace it.
Actually I believe the Holy Father said something positive about Martin Luther while visiting Germany the other day so I guess that must ruffle your feathers as well. 🙂
 
Actually, in my experience (not everybody, of cpurse) many of these people will not really be “satisfied” until the CC basically is destroyed and/or (“next best thing”) allows women priests, abortion, and gay marriage.
Yep, we are in the last days, people.:rolleyes:
Nah, just a time of chastisement, which will be followed by a far better time.
 
I don’t understand why some feel like they need to apologize for the Cursades. If it wasn’t for the first three Crusades all of Europe would be under Sharia law right now, and America probably wouldn’t exist as it does today.

But yeah I really like this pope and I’m protestant.
Yep. I agree. The Crusades were a good thing.
 
Is this the first time this has been said?
It is the first time that it has been said by a pope to the world. Bl. John Paul apologized to the Jews for what Christians have done to them and what they failed to do for them. It was a very specific apology. This is a global apology, if you will. What needs to be understood here is that those who committed acts of violence against others, in the name of Christianity were often not very good Christians or were led by the old saying, “the ends justifies the means.”

This is one reason that many in Traddom do not like St. Francis and St. Dominic. While they tried to preach truth, they opposed all forms of violence against heretics, Muslims and Jews. Francis actually betrayed the fourth Crusade by giving them away to the Muslims. He was horrified at the massacre that was going to take place. They were going to attack a village of civilians. The leaders of the brigade were more interested in the wealth in the village, than in liberating the Holy Land. So, men like Francis and Dominic drew the line in the sand. Both went down in history for apologizing to Muslims, Jews and heretical Christians.

This is the first time that a pope applies to the world for the violence done by so called Christians. It is one thing to defend yourself in a war and another to attack innocent people. In this regard, Christians and Jews tend to be very antisceptic. We point to Muslim extremists, but foget our own extremists.

As far as I’m concerned, an extremist can call himself Muslim, Christian, Jew or Martian, he’s still a terrorist, not a person of faith, regardless of what he says he believes. People of faith act with conscience and I think this is the point that Pope Benedict is making. He’s not saying that Christians are violent people, but that those who acted without conscience, allegedly in the name of Christianity, have brought shame to Christianity.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
He’s not saying that Christians are violent people, but that those who acted without conscience, allegedly in the name of Christianity, have brought shame to Christianity.
I agree, however I am unsure exactly who this describes.

Take the crusades. Most crusaders made their vow for the sake of winning back Christian land, and Christian people, to Christian rule.

When they arrived in the Holy Land, they found the fighting brutal, difficult, horrific. The hate they may have felt was enkindled by the fear and pain they experienced. Crusaders, like soldiers in every war, came in various kinds from the compassionate to the ruthless.

Historically, it is with great difficulty that we can undertake to judge Catholics of an earlier time. When a more or less unified Christendom existed, it must have seemed to the Catholics then living that Christendom existed because God willed it. Hence, to defend it doubtless seemed the right thing to do. After all, when Christendom was attacked, it was attacked as such. They did not know that eventually Christendom would be lost. How could they have known?

If the popes of an earlier time said that the time to fight was at hand, and a later pope says that there is never a time to fight, what are the faithful to think? Clearly, different popes have a different viewpoint. How can we judge which is correct, which incorrect?

For all we know, a different pope in the future will preach something different.

Would the Isrealites apologize to the Canaanites, were there any left? This brings us to what seems a conundrum: where the best way to prove God sanctions a war is to ensure that not a man, woman or child of the enemy is left. Like at Jericho.
 
Actually, in my experience (not everybody, of cpurse) many of these people will not really be “satisfied” until the CC basically is destroyed and/or (“next best thing”) allows women priests, abortion, and gay marriage.
Yep, we are in the last days, people.:rolleyes:
The Lord has said that no one knows the day or hour of his coming, so I’m not prepared to agree that we are in “the last days” before he comes. I am prepared to say that it doesn’t really matter if we are or not. We are called to be true to the faith and to what our Lord has taught us at all times, not just at the end of time. It doesn’t matter if others are not satisfied with apologies the Church offers for falling short of what our Lord has called his people to be. What is important is that we know when we fall short and that we confess our failings to God and to those we offend; that we maitain faith with what Jesus has taught us and calls us to be. The Church cannot be destroyed except that the Lord wills it. He has promised us that the Church will remain until its mission is completed and the Kingdom comes. That’s good enough for me.
 
Hopefully.👍👍
There are too many things yet to happen for this to be the last days, and frankly as bad as things are, they are nothing compared to what the world will see during the Great Tribulation. So, I just can’t see how this can be the end times (don’t forget, there will be a Mass coversion of the Jews just before the end as well, and that is nowhere in sight today). WE will not see the end until the full number of Gentiles has entered the Church, along with (as the Bible says) all Israel.

Try to imagine how Christians felt during WWI and WWII, that was a 31 year period that had to feel like the end of the world with 80,000,000 killed–yet it was not. Recall that when WWI started there was less than 2-billion people on the planet, and yet over the following 31 years more than 80,000,000 would die and the vast majority of those were Christians. It had to seem as if Jesus was going to return any day. Further, there were only 558,000,000 Christians in the world in the year 1900, which means during the two major wars roughly 15% of those Christians died!

Nope, imo, we are either going through a rough time born of the consequences of our own personal and corporate sins, or God has allowed a chastisement of our own making to fall upon us now, or a combination of the two–but I sure see no signs of the end coming any time soon. 🙂
 
There are too many things yet to happen for this to be the last days,
You reminded me of War and Peace , when Nikolai Rostov sees the French charging and is amazed that anyone would want to kill him: “Kill me? Me? Whom everybody loves so?”

🙂
 
You reminded me of War and Peace , when Nikolai Rostov sees the French charging and is amazed that anyone would want to kill him: “Kill me? Me? Whom everybody loves so?”

🙂
🙂 What did I say to remind you of that?
 
I don’t understand why some feel like they need to apologize for the Cursades. If it wasn’t for the first three Crusades all of Europe would be under Sharia law right now, and America probably wouldn’t exist as it does today.
That’s just as true of the Crusades as the ousting out and victimization of Native Americans in order to form the US of A. But no one with an ounce of integrity would be proud of what we did to the Native Americans either.

I agree that the Crusades protected us from being subjected to Sharia law both in the past and in the present. But the fact is, they were brutal to their fellow Christians as well… remember they had no respect for freedom of religion, despite fighting the Muslims to protect their own freedom of religion. But all cultures have a sordid past. What is important is what to do in the present and future, because we just can’t change the past. But I don’t give our predecessors a pat on the back for all the cruelties they have subjected innocent people to. However, that doesn’t mean I don’t acknowledge the debt we owe them for our freedom today. Like anything else, there is good and bad, and usually they come together.
 
That’s just as true of the Crusades as the ousting out and victimization of Native Americans in order to form the US of A. But no one with an ounce of integrity would be proud of what we did to the Native Americans either.

I agree that the Crusades protected us from being subjected to Sharia law both in the past and in the present. But the fact is, they were brutal to their fellow Christians as well… remember they had no respect for freedom of religion, despite fighting the Muslims to protect their own freedom of religion. But all cultures have a sordid past. What is important is what to do in the present and future, because we just can’t change the past. But I don’t give our predecessors a pat on the back for all the cruelties they have subjected innocent people to. However, that doesn’t mean I don’t acknowledge the debt we owe them for our freedom today. Like anything else, there is good and bad, and usually they come together.
However, one must weigh how much good was done compared to the bad done by those following their own rules. The bad things done during the Crusades did not happen as orders from the Church or Pope, they were done by individuals and individual groups…that is always going to happen (sadly and tragically). Yet, the thought that the Pope or the Church set out to invoke those horrors is just false. To apologize (in a general sense) for what Christians did is fine, good and productive; however, to make it seem as if those horrors were Church/Pope mandated actions is wrong.

Let us not forget that while what “some” of our ancestors did to Native population was truly wrong, there were also things done by Natives that were truly wrong (and some of that was not in response to what our ancestors did). It is so difficult to get past conventional wisdoms misguided hand. Humans, all types, are fallen–that is the real lesson here.
 
Because none of us likes to think the world would end while we’re still in it!!!🙂
That was not even remotely close to my thought.🙂 I know full well that the Lord can return at any time; however, if we listen to the Church and Revelation, there are still many things that must take place before the Lord returns–that is all I am saying. I do not believe the Lord’s return is eminent for these reasons (all taught by the Church and Revelation):
  1. The Gospel has not been preached to the full world.
  2. The Jews have not converted.
  3. Gentiles continue to enter the Church in large numbers.
  4. The Church, while it is undergoing a great trial, there is no sign that it is the final trial (though I will say I think a significant apostasy has happened).
  5. The world, while in pain, shows not sign of suffering through a great Tribulation.
Of course, the Lord can bring all those issues to resolution very rapidly. Yet, as things look right now, it sure does not seem as if He will return anytime soon. If the Lord does return soon, may He save and bless all of us, everyone we know, and the world. 🙂
 
This goes to show that even the Pope is politically correct. Thank you Benedict, for sacrificing your faithful flock of the past. I’m sure that St. Louis IX, Bernard of Clairvaux, Priest-King Louis VI and many many others are quite “content” knowing that their efforts to fight for the Just War of St. Augustine has now turned into the shame of Christendom, when there is proof that the violence was justified.

I am not a big fan of this Pope. He is obviously not an apologist.

-MontChevalier
 
This goes to show that even the Pope is politically correct. Thank you Benedict, for sacrificing your faithful flock of the past. I’m sure that St. Louis IX, Bernard of Clairvaux, Priest-King Louis VI and many many others are quite “content” knowing that their efforts to fight for the Just War of St. Augustine has now turned into the shame of Christendom, when there is proof that the violence was justified.

I am not a big fan of this Pope. He is obviously not an apologist.

-MontChevalier
I am a big fan of this Pope, and perhaps he realizes that walkign softly with the love of Christ (while not forfeiting the truth) is far better than walking aggresively toward those you want to convert.

Taking the: “you are wrong and I am correct” approach might actually be in fact truth, yet it will never go over well with those we are trying to bring into the full light of Christ. As Saint Paul said, “To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to all men so that by all possible means I might save some.” We must meet people where they are, and in a way that will attract them to the truth, without sacrificing the truth in the process–THAT is the only real way to help save those around us. 🙂
 
I am a big fan of this Pope, and perhaps he realizes that walkign softly with the love of Christ (while not forfeiting the truth) is far better than walking aggresively toward those you want to convert.

Taking the: “you are wrong and I am correct” approach might actually be in fact truth, yet it will never go over well with those we are trying to bring into the full light of Christ. As Saint Paul said, “To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to all men so that by all possible means I might save some.” We must meet people where they are, and in a way that will attract them to the truth, without sacrificing the truth in the process–THAT is the only real way to help save those around us. 🙂
I refuse your reasoning.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top