Pope Francis assures sceptics: You don’t have to believe in God to go to heaven

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bubba_Switzler
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The argument about whether atheists can go to heaven is really a proxy argument.

The underlying question is how ought one live one’s life. Whether one goes to heaven is the ultimate judgement on one’s life. While we can’t actually know who goes to heaven, saints notwithstanding, we can speak in generalities.

There are those, many Catholics included, who feel that all this Catholic stuff is well and good if you’re into that sort of thing. But if you’re not, well, no big deal. We’re all God’s children and that’s really what matters. Kumbaya.

Those who regard the Church’s teachings as important are more likely to question whether atheists can go to heaven. It’s not that they hate athests and wish them ill. It’s that they believe what we do in life, what we make of ourselves, matters. And getting to heaven is the ultimate measure of what matters.

It also bears on the evangelical mission of the Church. If atheists can go to heaven why exactly do we need to convert them to Christianity? We’re not doing them any favor by it. Let them be.
There are many of us that find the Church’s teachings as very important that do not spend time questioning if atheist will or should go to heaven.

No all of us are or should be evangelical. Some show their faith by how they live their lives, some go out and preach. I do not want someone trying to convert me to another faith. My brother, who is no long Catholic tried to convert me every time he was around me, know I simply do not see him.
 
There are many of us that find the Church’s teachings as very important that do not spend time questioning if atheist will or should go to heaven.

No all of us are or should be evangelical. Some show their faith by how they live their lives, some go out and preach. I do not want someone trying to convert me to another faith. My brother, who is no long Catholic tried to convert me every time he was around me, know I simply do not see him.
And yet, here you are in this thread shouting loudly how little you care about the subject.

Let me ask: do you believe those annoying individuals who go around trying to convert others to their beliefs can go to heaven?
 
I was wondering why so much attention is being given to what the Pope said here? …Why does it matter what God does or doesn’t do with atheist? Does it really have anything to do with ones own relationship to God? …if you think about it, there are not that many true atheist.
Two part answer:
  1. I do understand the concern some would have IF they interpreted the Pope’s words as minimizing either Catholicism or the moral life in general. I doubt that’s what’s happening, though. (on the Pope’s part). It’s not that such people, interpreting in that way, would fear loss of some kind of “exclusive” status; rather that they might wonder what value there is, then, in Catholicism specifically or the moral life generally. (if nothing “matters,” ultimately)
  2. I have never understood, from early childhood on, what anyone’s fixation on atheism would be, including a fixation by any Catholic. I really don’t get it. It seems like an exercise in imagination and theory to me. Probably like most Catholics, I live in a highly secularized environment (including locally), but that doesn’t necessarily equate to an atheistic community. Nor do I have atheists banging on my door, trying to “convert” me to atheism, nor people in the workplace or marketplace raising arguments about religion or non-religion of any kind. Indifference to God is not identical with refusal to believe in God. Indifference is a product of secularism (and often the affluence that can accompany that).
I am surrounded by secularists, materialists, skeptics, fervent hedonists, New Agers, and religious believers. Not atheists. Raise your hand if you are surrounded by atheists and if they supposedly are constantly proselytizing you, and you are in need of cogent arguments or other “weapons” of defense. 😃
 
I am surrounded by secularists, materialists, skeptics, fervent hedonists, New Agers, and religious believers. Not atheists. Raise your hand if you are surrounded by atheists and if they supposedly are constantly proselytizing you, and you are in need of cogent arguments or other “weapons” of defense.
Part of the problem stems from the definition of atheism. Atheists, themselves, will claim that they are not rejecting God anymore than we are rejecting Zeus. Atheists usually describe themselves in terms that we would call agnostic: they reject that which is not proven to their satisfaction.

On the other hand, Zeus is not followed by significant proportion of modern society. Atheists, in the more general sense, are very active in leading people away from Christianity in ways that you are perhaps aware of but not really thinking about. Popular culture is filled with alternatives to Go; seldom will you find characters in movies or television attending church. To concede that atheists don’t usually attack God directly is not to concede that they are not very actively and deliberately leading society away from Christianity.

So, yes, I am raising my hand.
 
Part of the problem stems from the definition of atheism. … Popular culture is filled with alternatives to Go[d]; seldom will you find characters in movies or television attending church. To concede that atheists don’t usually attack God directly is not to concede that they are not very actively and deliberately leading society away from Christianity…I am raising my hand.
Then your hand shouldn’t be raised, because atheism is hostile to God, not indifferent to or minimizing of God. People “not attending Church” is not, in itself, evident of disbelief, let alone of any need for any of us to “defend ourselves” or “argue against” atheists, per se. They aren’t, despite your claims, “deliberately leading society away.” They are living an alternative lifestyle.

What, precisely, is a “Zen Catholic?”
 
Then your hand shouldn’t be raised, because atheism is hostile to God, not indifferent to or minimizing of God. People “not attending Church” is not, in itself, evident of disbelief, let alone of any need for any of us to “defend ourselves” or “argue against” atheists, per se. They aren’t, despite your claims, “deliberately leading society away.” They are living an alternative lifestyle.
“Hostile to God”. Let’s examine that phrase for a moment.

Do you believe that God needs our defense of him? Is God a frail flower in danger of being crushed under jackboots? Are we talking about Satanists leading a charge of demons and sinners to storm the gates of heaven?

(For that matter, aren’t Satanists leading an “alternative lifestyle”? Isn’t Satan just a misunderstood victim of judgementalism?)

What is really at stake here? What is it we are really concerned with? Not God’s welfare, I assure you.
 
Then your hand shouldn’t be raised, because atheism is hostile to God, not indifferent to or minimizing of God. People “not attending Church” is not, in itself, evident of disbelief, let alone of any need for any of us to “defend ourselves” or “argue against” atheists, per se. They aren’t, despite your claims, “deliberately leading society away.” They are living an alternative lifestyle.

What, precisely, is a “Zen Catholic?”
I agree, atheist are not hostile to God. My spouse is a scientist so I know a couple of atheist, who are not agnostic. They believe all creation has a scientific explanation even though they cannot yet explain everything. They do not believe in any “higher power” so they are not hostile to something they don’t believe exists.

My question to them is that if all energy comes from a previous energy, how did that very first energy come to exist on its own? To this they usually say “we cannot yet explain this, but in time we will”. Never do they try to convert me or even argue with me. Most atheist don’t want to convert people, they just don’t want people constantly forcing God on them.

I don’t agree with them, but I do understand them not wanting to be force to acknowledge something they don’t believe exists. As long as those of us that want God keep as a part of American just need to keep defending that when it comes up.
 
atheism is hostile to God, not indifferent to or minimizing of God.
Then you have a different definition of “hostile” than some of us do. To me, “hostile to God” means actively opposing. Most atheists I know are no more hostile to God than I am hostile to vampires. There’s no reason to be hostile toward something you believe does not exist.
 
Pope John Paul II in Los Angeles Times Dec 12 1984 Quoted as saying " Don’t go to God for Forgiveness of Sins Come unto me" End.
BS. Please provide a documented quote, otherwise apologize for spreading falsehood.

Thou shall not bare false witness against thy neighbor. If I’m not mistaken this is biblical, isn’t it?
 
Then you have a different definition of “hostile” than some of us do. To me, “hostile to God” means actively opposing. Most atheists I know are no more hostile to God than I am hostile to vampires. There’s no reason to be hostile toward something you believe does not exist.
Indeed. I should have said (and meant): hostile to the idea of, concept of, God. 🙂

No one should classify those not practicing a specific religion as “atheists.” If they’re not practicing, or even unaffiliated, that is all they are, unless they have revealed to you in what or whom they do or do not believe.

Thus, my list:

secularists
materialists
fervent hedonists
New Agers
skeptics
religious believers

… and I will add:
seekers

may be lots of things, but by virtue of those categories, they are not, without further data, atheists. They may be:

believers
agnostics
and/or
indifferent to the deity in which they believe.

Probably a small portion of those are hardline atheists, and I doubt many of these encounter us to a significant degree.

I see the top list, actually, as problematic – far more problematic (many of them) than atheists per se. The former are far larger in number, for starters, and quite influential, including within Catholic communities.
 
Some people here would do well to go to a college campus these days and ask about atheism. You will find some proud atheists. Some strong atheists that have believed that to be logical is to be anti religion. It is in regard to these that I scratch my head at what the Pope has said.
 
Some people here would do well to go to a college campus these days and ask about atheism. You will find some proud atheists.
HD, this is most often a phase – unless the student has been raised in an atheistic environment from Day One. The number of “previous” believers, as well as future believers, who were college atheists is legion. Part of this goes right along with the cognitive development of this age group, which is to question everything, including (often) the most fundamental truths in which one was raised.

College age is not a definitive window into the permanent inclination of anyone. What you were in college you may or may not ever be again – religiously, emotionally, politically, and socially. College is a period of experimentation and transition. It is not reliable as a settled point. One is growing into an identity during those years, and very often the full synthesis between childhood, college, and late adolescence happens much later in life when all that is sifted and reformulated.
 
HD, this is most often a phase – unless the student has been raised in an atheistic environment from Day One. The number of “previous” believers, as well as future believers, who were college atheists is legion. Part of this goes right along with the cognitive development of this age group, which is to question everything, including (often) the most fundamental truths in which one was raised.

College age is not a definitive window into the permanent inclination of anyone. What you were in college you may or may not ever be again – religiously, emotionally, politically, and socially. College is a period of experimentation and transition. It is not reliable as a settled point. One is growing into an identity during those years, and very often the full synthesis between childhood, college, and late adolescence happens much later in life when all that is sifted and reformulated.
I think that is part of it. But I think there is something different going on. Something sinister. And I think it is more than just the normal natural questioning of life. I think it is being taught, believed, and worshiped.

It does little to dismiss it as a phase. An atheist would say the belief is just a phase and actually they would be more accurate looking at the numbers of people who fall away from the faith vs those who convert from atheism.
Even if it were a phase you must acknowledge it.
Within the science community there is a good mix of believers and Atheists. I find even later in life the believers are more likely to lose faith than the Atheists find it.
Within academia, right or wrong, science is taught and viewed as directly contrary to faith.
I know older scientists that are believers. And younger ones who are atheists down to their very fiber.

But you would be surprised.
The believers that are older, for the most part were always believers. The atheists, almost never convert.
In the sciences, it is not “just a phase” but rather a perversion of science and faith that lead to a loss of both.
 
I think that is part of it. But I think there is something different going on. Something sinister. And I think it is more than just the normal natural questioning of life. I think it is being taught, believed, and worshiped.

It does little to dismiss it as a phase. An atheist would say the belief is just a phase and actually they would be more accurate looking at the numbers of people who fall away from the faith vs those who convert from atheism.
Even if it were a phase you must acknowledge it.
Within the science community there is a good mix of believers and Atheists. I find even later in life the believers are more likely to lose faith than the Atheists find it.
Within academia, right or wrong, science is taught and viewed as directly contrary to faith.
I know older scientists that are believers. And younger ones who are atheists down to their very fiber.

But you would be surprised.
The believers that are older, for the most part were always believers. The atheists, almost never convert.
In the sciences, it is not “just a phase” but rather a perversion of science and faith that lead to a loss of both.
Your observations are consistent with mine. I really have to shake my head at those who try to minimize the decline of the Church and the growth of atheism in its various forms. A lot of people prefer to bury their heads in the sand rather than confront difficult challenges. We’ll just have to go forward without their help.
 
College age is not a definitive window into the permanent inclination of anyone. What you were in college you may or may not ever be again – religiously, emotionally, politically, and socially. College is a period of experimentation and transition. It is not reliable as a settled point. One is growing into an identity during those years, and very often the full synthesis between childhood, college, and late adolescence happens much later in life when all that is sifted and reformulated.
I disagree with some of this as well. College can be and is usually a time like you describe. But it is also when I FOUND my faith, it is when we ask seminarians to discern. It is when we discern our vocations. It forms us. Are we different than we were in college. Sure. But the path we started down in college tends to be the path we stay on later. ( for the most part) I know there are some people who major in constitutional law who go on to be a poet but for the most part who we are in college is who we will build ourselves up to be.
Which is why groups like Focus are so important.
 
Hopefully I am not getting off track here, or maybe this question should be another thread, but I was wondering why so much attention is being given to what the Pope said here? I believe in my faith, it is meshed into everything I do, think, feel. Why does it matter what God does or doesn’t do with atheist? Does it really have anything to do with ones own relationship to God? Would it change your faith if you found out they may actually be saved through God’s mercy? For me it does not. I believe what I believe and I worry about how I can best serve and love God everyday.

I understand his comment make people believe that now others will think they can just go and do anything and still be saved, but if you think about it, there are not that many true atheist and they don’t think about “being saved” because they don’t believe in an afterlife or a god.

All I know is if I make it to Heaven, I will bow down and thank God for His forgiveness and mercy on my soul, no matter who is standing in front of me or behind me.
In Any Discussion on Atheism, They have to believe in something .otherwise they Deny Their Own Existence, many talks have always come back to Creation, and why, Because the Universe has its order ,including the timing of Planets revolving around its Sun. It becomes clear to say why things are in order than to explain why they could not have been put in order by a Creator. They will loose their talk on Atheism Immediately. Having been with Scientists who try to take out the Creator equation, even they now look to the Bible for Answers and finding them ,it is All there to see, the world is Round, health ,everything which, old found out or more recent is All in the Bible, Amazing …not really God Created the Whole Universe and Everything in it, as Humans we cannot comprehend such truth until we understand how God reveals Himself in his word. The More we read his word and How he reveals himself the more we understand, God makes it Plain, Man Complicates and puts up his own ideas on how to Worship, normally for mans own Glory, Not Gods.
 
I disagree with some of this as well. College can be and is usually a time like you describe. But it is also when I FOUND my faith, it is when we ask seminarians to discern. It is when we discern our vocations. It forms us. Are we different than we were in college. Sure. But the path we started down in college tends to be the path we stay on later. ( for the most part) I know there are some people who major in constitutional law who go on to be a poet but for the most part who we are in college is who we will build ourselves up to be.
Which is why groups like Focus are so important.
I agree with Elizabeth. I have many older siblings and have finished college myself and I have found that college is usually time to let go and experiment, unfortunately more with sex, drugs, and alcohol. Although, I never got into those things in college, I know many people who did but they stopped that stuff when they got married. It did not set them on a path. Even those who go to Catholic colleges party just as much as others and unless people are there for a theology degree not many are looking deep into there faith at college, some not many.
 
Your observations are consistent with mine. I really have to shake my head at those who try to minimize the decline of the Church and the growth of atheism in its various forms. A lot of people prefer to bury their heads in the sand rather than confront difficult challenges. We’ll just have to go forward without their help.
You see it has a decline in the Church, some of us see it has a change. Do you really think the Church you want would be anything similar to the Churches that came about 2000 years ago, no. The people back then would probably be horrified at what you see as a “good” church. We are not burying our head in the sand just because we don’t agree with you.

To me some of the decline has been more people being outwardly condemning of others. Teaching and condemning are two different things. I was raised with a loving, merciful God who loved all His children whether they accepted that love or not, a Jesuit way. As a mother, I can completely related to this. Who could possibly feel truly worth of God’s love; I certainly can’t.

We all have different fights to fight, yours is not one I will be joining, but I don’t think that makes me less of a Catholic.
 
I agree with Elizabeth. I have many older siblings and have finished college myself and I have found that college is usually time to let go and experiment, unfortunately more with sex, drugs, and alcohol. Although, I never got into those things in college, I know many people who did but they stopped that stuff when they got married. It did not set them on a path. Even those who go to Catholic colleges party just as much as others and unless people are there for a theology degree not many are looking deep into there faith at college, some not many.
It is off the subject a ways but I still think college is a major player in what shapes our lives. Not just a time to drink and party. Most people I know met their spouse in college. And work in the field of study they chose. Experimentation? Or steps on a larger path?

PS

Off the subject entirely. This idea that college is for partying and drinking and experimenting and is a time when faith takes a back seat should send shivers down every parent’s spine and cause good families to really prioritize why and where they send their kids to school.
Historically College was a time to GROW in faith. Only our modern University culture seems to have passed this up for the “experimentation”

From today’s local paper.

jconline.com/article/20131004/BOILER/310040067/When-Purdue-s-weekend-drinking-rituals-begin-community-holds-its-breath

Think twice parents.🤷
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top