T
Timothysis
Guest
i’ll be durn’ed ,da Popes CATHOLIC ! :bigyikes:
i’ll be durn’ed ,da Popes CATHOLIC ! :bigyikes:
You combine two quotes out of context here. He says: “Some people continue to defend** trickle-down theories which assume** that economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness in the world”The Holy Father says this is regard to “trickle-down economics;”* This opinion, which has never been confirmed by the facts, expresses a crude and naive trust in the goodness of those wielding economic power and in the sacralized workings of the prevailing economic system.”*
Nope he did not say pay higher taxes nor did he mention regulation, I am thinking his hope is for those who earn money enough to pay taxes will gladly do so and not begrudgingly, and as I said before not, meanly or greedily, look for ways so as not to pay any at all. I don’t understand why people kid themselves so! peace, CarlanThat isn’t what the quote from the pope says, atleast as quoted. It implies that there should be higher taxes and more regulation. I agree with Timothysis’s post.
cough Reagonomics cough
- In this context, some people continue to defend trickle-down theories which assume that economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness in the world. This opinion, which has never been confirmed by the facts, expresses a crude and naïve trust in the goodness of those wielding economic power and in the sacralized workings of the prevailing economic system.
Spot on, Holy Father. We can’t leave the markets to themselves, and we can’t have these vast inequalities and expect a peaceful and happy society. The only real solution is a strong moral foundation rooted in Christ. And that compels us not to support a vast welfare state, since welfare is only a temporary response to those desperately in need.
- The need to resolve the structural causes of poverty cannot be delayed, not only for the pragmatic reason of its urgency for the good order of society, but because society needs to be cured of a sickness which is weakening and frustrating it, and which can only lead to new crises. Welfare projects, which meet certain urgent needs, should be considered merely temporary responses. As long as the problems of the poor are not radically resolved by rejecting the absolute autonomy of markets and financial speculation and by attacking the structural causes of inequality,[173] no solution will be found for the world’s problems or, for that matter, to any problems. Inequality is the root of social ills.
Austrians?
- We can no longer trust in the unseen forces and the invisible hand of the market.
The two quotes come from the same paragraph in the article and are both written about the same thing, “trickle-down economics.”You combine two quotes out of context here. He says: “Some people continue to defend** trickle-down theories which assume** that **economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will inevitably **succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness in the world”
At the heart of “trickle-down economics” is the concept of lower taxes and less government regulation. To criticize this is to suggest that they are wrong and should be reversed.Nope he did not say pay higher taxes nor did he mention regulation, I am thinking his hope is for those who earn money enough to pay taxes will gladly do so and not begrudgingly, and as I said before not, meanly or greedily, look for ways so as not to pay any at all. I don’t understand why people kid themselves so! peace, Carlan
The Bolsheviks thought the same.Spot on, Holy Father. We can’t leave the markets to themselves, and we can’t have these vast inequalities and expect a peaceful and happy society.
A broken clock is right twice a day.The Bolsheviks thought the same.
A society centered on Jesus. I think that’s pretty clear from the Pope’s message (although the media is already using the “trickle down economics” phrase to add to their caricature of Pope Francis as a liberalSo, what is the answer?
- Precisely because this involves the internal consistency of our message about the value of the human person, the Church cannot be expected to change her position on this question. I want to be completely honest in this regard. This is not something subject to alleged reforms or “modernizations”. It is not “progressive” to try to resolve problems by eliminating a human life.
Not when you take it behind a building and shoot it in the back of its head with a small caliber pistol.A broken clock is right twice a day.
Tell me, when has the world ever been a “society centered on Jesus?”A society centered on Jesus.
Yes, but you failed to mention he did not condemn each and every version of ‘trickle down economics’. He condemned * trickle-down** theories which assume** that economic growth, encouraged by a free market,** will inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness in the world**.* He condemned THAT specifically, not ‘trickle down’ (in its many meanings) generally.The two quotes come from the same paragraph in the article and are both written about the same thing, “trickle-down economics.”![]()
noThis must be a real stab-in-the-back to those who support Reaganomics.
Indeed. The idolatrous cult (I can’t think of a better word) given to people like Hayek and von Mises in some corners of the Internet is scary.cough Reagonomics cough
Spot on, Holy Father. We can’t leave the markets to themselves, and we can’t have these vast inequalities and expect a peaceful and happy society. The only real solution is a strong moral foundation rooted in Christ. And that compels us not to support a vast welfare state, since welfare is only a temporary response to those desperately in need.
Austrians?![]()
Exactly. The solution isn’t “more government” or “more business”; it’s more Christianity.I think what one finds at the center of the Pope’s message is that we need Jesus and a cultural and ideological renewal based on Christ. Otherwise there will continue to be problems regardless of the technical solution.
Although this is the strongest statement to date, this is just a repeat of what the Holy Father has been alluding to and saying for some time: The current world economic system, built off of a selfish form of capitalism, is not just. We have to give a bigger space for helping the poor and we have to combat the tendency towards selfishness and materialism that is seemingly inherent in the current system… There is a clear difference between a world driven by economic forces of consumerism and greed and the use of the State violence to redistribute. I think if you read the Exhortation of the Pope (rather than the media’s interpretation), you will find his condemnation is more to Ayn Randian philosophies (long condemned by the Church; explicitly or implicitly) than capitalistic ideas on the use of State force in the economy.
It is possibly to read an implied condemnation of the latter, but it is a forced interpretation and one that does not follow from the literal words of the text.
Why do you think he thinks that?It sounds like he considers government to be the best way to distribute wealth to the poor.
Most economists wouldn’t really be “qualified” for economics either if we actually held them accountable for their many failed predictions.I’m not sure the Holy Father is qualified as an economist…
What exactly would be considered a “crippling tax” on the wealthy? There are people who could quite comfortably pay 95% income tax and still have way more than they will ever need. Those same people act as if paying 35% is going to leave them starving in the street.Actually, his message is a critique of a certain economic system that, in his opinion, does not provide for all. Critiquing lower taxes as a means to spur economic growth is far more than simply telling us to "think of others and put their good ahead of our own." Other than being a champion of the poor and marginalized, I don’t see the point of what he said. Crippling taxes imposed on the wealthy and successful are not going to bring about a change in “income inequality.” I also find it odd that the Holy Father would use a term that is mostly used by political liberals - the same who support abortion and gay marriage - as something sought by the Church.