C
Convert_in_99
Guest
Poland seems to be holding its moral ground some. Not ideal maybe but it’s a possibility if the US gets much worse.I’m not sure what the Pope meant by this statement, and perhaps sometime he’ll further explain.
But on the assumption (and I’m not sure it’s a good one) he means we in the West need to admit people from Muslim front-line states without limitation or preference, one might want to consider where refugees might go when there is no longer a place of refuge.
For example, are parts of France, Britain, Germany and even some smallish locations in the U.S. where Islam dominates truly “refuges” anymore? Is France a “refuge” for Jews nowadays? Seems it isn’t since Jews are leaving there due to harassment by Muslims.
I recall some historian’s assertion (I can no longer recall who) that when the Arab conquerers from Arabia took Palestine and Syria, they “brought the desert with them”, in that, over centuries of misrule they turned a fruitful land into a desolate one.
And so, we might ask ourselves whether some of the refugees (if that’s what they truly are) “bring Middle Eastern jihadism with them” or “bring Somali chaos with them”.
I have sometimes thought the time may come when Christians in Europe and elsewhere may flee their homelands if Islamic jihadism becomes too much to bear where they were born. If so, it would be nice if there were a few “refuges” left, such as the U.S.
In answer to your other question, how would you feel if you were denied access to a better, safer country and the basic necessities it provides because of your faith or ethnicity? Its a little different when you are the immigrant isn’t it?