R
RGCheek
Guest
And I think that 6000 years of parental experience across the globe and stored in the traditions and moral values of the vast majority of the worlds cultures and the teaching of the church far outweigh pop psychology and the latest whimsical fads.I don’t doubt RGCheek meant what he typed (sorry, RGCheek, for constantly referring to you in the third person now). It seems to me he is attempting to somehow ennoble hitting our kids (correct me if I’m wrong), and I have to disagree.
The Pope certainly meant what he said too, except he isn’t here on this forum to clarify. If he meant smacking a kid on the bottom is better than hitting them on the face, I could agree with that, though it hardly seems an ideal worth aspiring to (why not just not hit them at all?). If he is actually endorsing hitting our kids on a regular basis as some program of love and discipline (setting limits, in RGCheek’s words), then I very much think we can do better as parents.
No one is advocating ‘hitting’ our kids. Why do you critics keep falling back on overly broad terms instead of specific terms? What does it benefit you to obscure the actual act under discussion?
We are talking about ‘spanking’ not whacking a child over the head with a 2x45 or a sledge hammer.
Why do you persist in ignoring the difference? You think the Pope might have been implying that hitting a kid with a hammer is OK?