Pope Francis: turn to the Bible to engage in spiritual combat [CWN]

  • Thread starter Thread starter CWN_News
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

CWN_News

Guest
Reflecting on the day’s Gospel reading (Mt. 4:1-11), Pope Francis spoke about the importance of Sacred Scripture during his March 5 Angelus address.

More…
 
I’m loving this emphasis that Pope Francis has on the Bible:thumbsup:
 
Reflecting on the day’s Gospel reading (Mt. 4:1-11), Pope Francis spoke about the importance of Sacred Scripture during his March 5 Angelus address.

More…
A couple of months ago here at CAF there were a couple of Catholic posters adamantly stating that since we have Christ’s Roman Catholic Church we really do not need the Bible. I remember the consternation this caused to some of us Protestant members.

It is very refreshing to see that the Pope does not agree with the idea that we do not need the Bible!
 
A couple of months ago here at CAF there were a couple of Catholic posters adamantly stating that since we have Christ’s Roman Catholic Church we really do not need the Bible. I remember the consternation this caused to some of us Protestant members.

It is very refreshing to see that the Pope does not agree with the idea that we do not need the Bible!
The Catholic Church does not teach and never has taught (and never will) that we do not need the Bible. See Dei verbum

Pope Francis is really great at reminding us of important things like this.

That said, one has to remember that the church did precede the New Testament so some people get things wrong from time to time, but again…such mistakes are not in line with authentic and authoritative church teaching. Listen to Which Came First, the Church or the Bible?

Pax tecum,
 
A couple of months ago here at CAF there were a couple of Catholic posters adamantly stating that since we have Christ’s Roman Catholic Church we really do not need the Bible. I remember the consternation this caused to some of us Protestant members.

It is very refreshing to see that the Pope does not agree with the idea that we do not need the Bible!
whoever those “Catholic” posters were, they were 100% wrong.
 
whoever those “Catholic” posters were, they were 100% wrong.
I agree and stated that back there in the thread "Why if you do, don’t you beleive the RCC is the one true Church started by Christ?

In pst 241 Rinnie stated the Bible is not needed and in 268 PJM agreed that her statement was a great post!

I don’t believe the CC has ever taught that.
 
A couple of months ago here at CAF there were a couple of Catholic posters adamantly stating that since we have Christ’s Roman Catholic Church we really do not need the Bible.** I remember the consternation this caused to some of us Protestant member****s**.
Hi Wannano.

As one popular hymn says, Be not consternated.

I mean think about it, why worry so much about something posted anonymously on the internet? (Unless I’m the one posting it of course.)
 
Hi Wannano.

As one popular hymn says, Be not consternated.

I mean think about it, why worry so much about something posted anonymously on the internet? (Unless I’m the one posting it of course.)
I guess if someone by their own design appears to be a fountain of knowledge that represents my viewpoint, I would hope they would be well versed in at least the basics. 🤷
 
I guess if someone by their own design appears to be a fountain of knowledge that represents my viewpoint, I would hope they would be well versed in at least the basics. 🤷
Same here. Kellyanne Conway strikes me as a good example of someone who appears to represent my, and conservatives’ in general, viewpoint. And there are many other such examples, I don’t doubt. But an anonymous post on the internet? No I can’t see how people can reasonably conclude that it represents me – anymore than an anonymous post made by myself can be taken as representing other people.
 
Same here. Kellyanne Conway strikes me as a good example of someone who appears to represent my, and conservatives’ in general, viewpoint. And there are many other such examples, I don’t doubt. But an anonymous post on the internet? No I can’t see how people can reasonably conclude that it represents me – anymore than an anonymous post made by myself can be taken as representing other people.
True enough, however, it is a Catholic forum. I read that Protestants have all kinds of diverse opinions and how bad that is compared to the Catholic Church where there is unity. Surely pOsters who identify themselves as Catholic don’t have differing doctrines or different interpretations of the Catachiesm??😦
 
Surely posters who identify themselves as Catholic don’t have differing doctrines or different interpretations of the Catachiesm??😦
No, of course not you silly man. Didn’t you know that “Protestants are led by the devil” is right out of the CCC?
 
Okay not really. Just wanted to see if you were paying attention. :o
 
No, of course not you silly man. Didn’t you know that “Protestants are led by the devil” is right out of the CCC?
Only because I wrote it in mine…
so I don’t have to explain to y’all, I’m joking
 
Not a question. It was a statement. This appears to be a Catholic evangelistic statement by the Pope no? There’s a board for that.
That’s true. But I’m glad it ended up here for whatever reason, because otherwise I may never have seen it.

I just hope this isn’t an indication of “bible is Protestant” type thinking. :o
 
I agree and stated that back there in the thread "Why if you do, don’t you beleive the RCC is the one true Church started by Christ?

In pst 241 Rinnie stated the Bible is not needed and in 268 PJM agreed that her statement was a great post!

I don’t believe the CC has ever taught that.
So you are saying the bible is necessary for salvation?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top