Since 2002 the following changes that I am aware of…there may be other changesAnd as I said in the other thread on this topic, it’s all just words. What is changing?
Good measures. I would also excommunicate the abusers reserved to the Holy See and at least laicise those who covered up the abuse, possibly excommunicating them too.In addition to what I posted above, I found this…
- Safe Environment training is taking place in 193 dioceses/eparchies of the country. Over 2 million adults have been trained to recognize the behavior of offenders and what to do about it.
- Over 5 million children have been equipped with the skills to help them protect themselves from abuse.
- Background checks are conducted on Church personnel who have contact with children. Over 2 million volunteers and employees; 52,000 clerics; 6,205 candidates for ordination have had their backgrounds evaluated.
- All dioceses/eparchies have Codes of Conduct spelling out what is acceptable behavior. This serves to let people know what can and cannot be done as well as letting others know what behavior can be expected. It encourages the reporting of suspicious behavior.
- All dioceses/eparchies have Victim Assistance Coordinators, assuring victims that they will be heard. In 2009, $6,536,109 was spent on therapy for the victims of clergy sexual abuse.
- All dioceses/eparchies have Safe Environment Coordinators who assure the ongoing compliance with the Charter for the Protection of Children.
- Bishops are meeting with victims.
- Dioceses/eparchies have Healing Masses, retreats for victim/survivors and other reconciliation events.
- There is a Zero Tolerance policy on abusers since 2002. If a credible accusation is made against a cleric, they are permanently removed from ministry regardless of how long ago the offense occurred.
- Dioceses/eparchies require intensive background screening as well as psychological testing for those wishing to enter the seminary.
It’s quite possible that more changes will be developed since the latest news was published. I agree with laicizing them, but not excommunication. They just like all sinners, need access to the sacrament of reconciliation.Good measures. I would also excommunicate the abusers reserved to the Holy See and at least laicise those who covered up the abuse, possibly excommunicating them too.
Excommunications can be lifted and I think it sends a needed message that this is not going to be tolerated any more. These people have jeopardized countless souls.It’s quite possible that more changes will be developed since the latest news was published. I agree with laicizing them, but not excommunication. They just like all sinners, need access to the sacrament of reconciliation.
Thank you for posting this…
I agree… any clergy who sexual abuses another person (child or adult) should be PUBLICLY excommunicated by his bishop and any bishop who commits sexual abuse or covers it up should be PUBLICLY excommunicated by the Pope.Good measures. I would also excommunicate the abusers reserved to the Holy See and at least laicise those who covered up the abuse, possibly excommunicating them too.
That footnote is:I invite the entire holy faithful People of God to a penitential exercise of prayer and fasting, following the Lord’s command.[1]
I wonder if the Church pretty much having almost no penitential discipline anymore (fasting is just a little on only two days of the year), has contributed to this. We stopped fasting and this demon seems to have had his way with things…1 “But this kind [of demon] does not come out except by prayer and fasting” (Mt 17:21).
Words are worthless these days. As the ancient saying says, “talk is cheap.”What changes do you need to see? The pope can not turn back time to prevent the abuse. All he can do at this time is use words.