P
phil19034
Guest
thank you! I just fixed it
Are you aware of what has been put into place in the church in the US since the early aughts? Changes have been made since the abuse scandal first came to light.What we want to see are concrete plans of action. Real steps, even controversial ones, that would, if necessary, overhaul the entire clerical structure of the Church that is not of divine institution. I don’t care what it is: more-intense-than-usual psychological profiling, profiling based on actions (effete men do not get admitted to the seminary); abolition of Latin church celibacy; ordination of knowledgeable married laymen for non-pastoral positions, just to say Mass and absolve…I don’t know. I’m not saying any of these are good or bad ideas, but SOMETHING beyond “thoughts and prayers” and “I feel your pain” and “mea culpa.” Something drastic. Something concrete. Something controversial.
No, and obviously, whatever it is isn’t working.porthos11:
Are you aware of what has been put into place in the church in the US since the early aughts? Changes have been made since the abuse scandal first came to light.What we want to see are concrete plans of action. Real steps, even controversial ones, that would, if necessary, overhaul the entire clerical structure of the Church that is not of divine institution. I don’t care what it is: more-intense-than-usual psychological profiling, profiling based on actions (effete men do not get admitted to the seminary); abolition of Latin church celibacy; ordination of knowledgeable married laymen for non-pastoral positions, just to say Mass and absolve…I don’t know. I’m not saying any of these are good or bad ideas, but SOMETHING beyond “thoughts and prayers” and “I feel your pain” and “mea culpa.” Something drastic. Something concrete. Something controversial.
Except that it is working…do some research.No, and obviously, whatever it is isn’t working.
Well what do you want Francis to do, mount a white charger, line up the clergy, and then go lopping off heads? Your cynicism, is a simple vain way of saying, you really don’t want to be any part of the solution.And as I said in the other thread on this topic, it’s all just words. What is changing?
To be fair, I don’t think this to be cynicism. This has been an issue in the Church for some time now, and the full impact of what was going on for years is only now being brought to light. While I agree that a Papal letter to the congregants is not the place to issue policy statements, it is not unfair to ask, “What is the Church doing in light of these abuses?” Its a fair question that the Pope does owe an answer to eventually.Well what do you want Francis to do, mount a white charger, line up the clergy, and then go lopping off heads? Your cynicism, is a simple vain way of saying, you really don’t want to be any part of the solution.
Are you aware of what has been put into place in the church in the US since the early aughts? Changes have been made since the abuse scandal first came to light.
Your reply to Janet reveals an ignorant and cynical attitude of self righteous angst. These abuses happened in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90’s. Janet referred to the years after the Dallas conference when the bishops got together to combat this crime. If these instances of abuse were happening in the last 10 years, I’d agree with your cynical statement. You really need to be informed about what has taken place in the last fifteen years since this problem was revealed in the late 90’s and early aughts (00).No, and obviously, whatever it is isn’t working.
Not good enough. Not good enough.
Suggest you see the post below yours. This problem has been fully addressed since the Dallas Conference in 2002 where the bishops put in place measures to insure this never occurs again. These current bishops are not the ones who spent time covering up and making very poor judgments of these priests in 1965 or 1981. Again, your ignorance is indicative of someone shooting from the hip without knowing what you are talking about.joeybaggz:
To be fair, I don’t think this to be cynicism. This has been an issue in the Church for some time now, and the full impact of what was going on for years is only now being brought to light. While I agree that a Papal letter to the congregants is not the place to issue policy statements, it is not unfair to ask, “What is the Church doing in light of these abuses?” Its a fair question that the Pope does owe an answer to eventually.Well what do you want Francis to do, mount a white charger, line up the clergy, and then go lopping off heads? Your cynicism, is a simple vain way of saying, you really don’t want to be any part of the solution.
I couldn’t agree more Elf and Phil. Only problem is, many, if not most, of the priests and bishops who are culpable in these situations, ARE ALREADY DEAD! Now unless you want to do what that pope who dug up his predecessor, excommunicated him, and threw his corpse in the river, I guess you and I will have to be satisfied venting our frustration on CAF forums.Elf01:
I agree… any clergy who sexual abuses another person (child or adult) should be PUBLICLY excommunicated by his bishop and any bishop who commits sexual abuse or covers it up should be PUBLICLY excommunicated by the Pope.Good measures. I would also excommunicate the abusers reserved to the Holy See and at least laicise those who covered up the abuse, possibly excommunicating them too.
In a Church where clericalism reigns, as a layperson I can’t be part of the solution.Well what do you want Francis to do, mount a white charger, line up the clergy, and then go lopping off heads? Your cynicism, is a simple vain way of saying, you really don’t want to be any part of the solution.