No !

actually since you read them can you tell me which one is the best ? I might read one to determine if I could read another, I need to see what all the fuss is about.
To be honest, I think the best of the series is the final book.
However, there’s a lot of development of characters that has gone on in books 2-6 that would make it very difficult to skip there. Although I’d really recommend reading the entire series
if you are so inclined, I would say to read book 4 (
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. Skip the movie version, though–I found it intensely disappointing (well, movie-PoA & GoF are both
very disappointing compared to the books, OotP was too short by far but at least didn’t annoy me).
It occurred to me (and this is a more general comment, and not just aimed at the poster quoted in the above snip), that part of what bothers me about those opposed to Harry Potter novels (and thus why I will defend having read them myself and permitting my children to read them) is that while it is a matter of supreme indifference to me whether any HP novel opponent reads/doesn’t read these novels (except insofar as I believe that they should actually
read the books to have any opinion other than ‘not for me’), those who are opposed to the novels seem to be making far more of an issue of it, almost as though ‘reading the Harry Potter novels’ is equivalent to ‘eating meat sacrificed to idols’ (and then being the ‘professional weaker brethren’).
In one of these threads, it was well stated by another poster (estesbob, was that you?) that the problem those who do read the novels have is the opponents “pretending concern for the Truth with so little regard for truth”.
Point in fact–the lead to this whole thread. A) the man who is now Pope Benedict XVI was not pope at the time he wrote the letters in question B) the letters in question are not about the Harry Potter novels, but concern a book
about the Harry Potter novels and C) it is rather hypocritical of
LifeSiteNews.com to criticize the media of the world for misleading via headline that then Pope John Paul II approved of the novels (and they would be correct in that criticism–the headlines
were misleading, and
then turn around and do the very same thing themselves when the slant favors their pre-existing opinion.
Don’t like the Harry Potter novels? Fine, don’t read them. There are thousands of novels in the world that I personally will never read (even if they’re in a language I
can read) just because I don’t want to. No one is obliged to read
any particular work of fiction. However, if you’re in the ‘don’t like Harry Potter novels’ camp, please do not say that I am committing sin by reading them while repeating lies from second- and third-hand sources and not caring when told that those sources are in error.