Pope reaffirms ban on women priests

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarcoPolo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I have.
It tells me that no women are *even allowed *to become part of the Church Hierarchy.
So?

Here’s the thing.

Let’s take, oh, say, MENSA.

MENSA has rules and regulations for its members. The members must pass a test which measures IQ and achieve a sufficient score.

So. . .is MENSA ‘discriminating’ against the ‘lesser-IQ’ people by not admitting them to membership?

If Jane, who repeatedly fails the test, starts to insist that the ACLU ‘force’ MENSA to admit any who seek membership, regardless of whether or not those people meet the requirements which the group set up, what do you think will happen?

What do you think SHOULD happen?
 
So the Church believes itself to be all-powerful (in relation to this Fallen World)?
Where did you get all-powerful from able to speak truth in relation to morals and faith?

Can the Pope move mountains and defy gravity? No.

Can he tell us if abortion is moral or not? Absolutely yes.
Can he do so as the Vicar of Christ? Absolutely.
Can we be sure when he sits on the seat of Peter and says abortion is immoral that he speaks for God? Yup!
 
I have.
It tells me that no women are *even allowed *to become part of the Church Hierarchy.
Mother Theresa?
Mother Angelica?

If they aren’t part of the Hierarchy I don’t know who is.

Although I wonder why it is you think that positions of power and authority are so important. I would rather be a lowly servant ANY day then the leader of a flock as unruly as humans.

PS: I think it is noteworthy that some women who HAVE been in the position to grab great power opted out. There have been many very influential women (in the Church) who had very loyal followers who opted NOT to push for female ordination, who opted NOT to take positions of authority beyond what was forced on them… Because authority and ‘power’ is not ours even when it seems to be. (and of course by ‘ours’, I mean mankind in general, not just females).

I just think your focus is skewed but I understand why. And I’m sure you think my focus is skewed too. 🙂
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by AngryAtheist8
I have.
It tells me that no women are even allowed to become part of the Church Hierarchy.
So?

Here’s the thing.

Let’s take, oh, say, MENSA.

MENSA has rules and regulations for its members. The members must pass a test which measures IQ and achieve a sufficient score.

So. . .is MENSA ‘discriminating’ against the ‘lesser-IQ’ people by not admitting them to membership?

If Jane, who repeatedly fails the test, starts to insist that the ACLU ‘force’ MENSA to admit any who seek membership, regardless of whether or not those people meet the requirements which the group set up, what do you think will happen?

What do you think SHOULD happen?
That’s not a good example.
MENSA members are all geniuses, but the Catholic Church has both male and female members, and supposedly exists for the benefit of/to help out, both men and women.
Yet only men can be part of the Hierarchy/Leadership.

I admit that we guys have set up a sweet deal for ourselves, but that doesn’t make it fair. And I am sure that if I was a girl I would like it even less:shrug:
 
Where did you get all-powerful from able to speak truth in relation to morals and faith?

Can the Pope move mountains and defy gravity? No.

Can he tell us if abortion is moral or not? Absolutely yes.
Can he do so as the Vicar of Christ? Absolutely.
Can we be sure when he sits on the seat of Peter and says abortion is immoral that he speaks for God? Yup!
I didn’t say that the Catholic Church had unlimited power, I was saying that the Catholic Church appears to think it has (or at least should have) power without limits (within the context of the moral law that the Church itself has established).
 
**Mother Theresa?
Mother Angelica?

If they aren’t part of the Hierarchy I don’t know who is.**
Although I wonder why it is you think that positions of power and authority are so important. I would rather be a lowly servant ANY day then the leader of a flock as unruly as humans.

PS: I think it is noteworthy that some women who HAVE been in the position to grab great power opted out. There have been many very influential women (in the Church) who had very loyal followers who opted NOT to push for female ordination, who opted NOT to take positions of authority beyond what was forced on them… Because authority and ‘power’ is not ours even when it seems to be. (and of course by ‘ours’, I mean mankind in general, not just females).

I just think your focus is skewed but I understand why. And I’m sure you think my focus is skewed too. 🙂
They are not.
You have to be a priest to be a part of the hierarchy.
 
I didn’t say that the Catholic Church had unlimited power, I was saying that the Catholic Church appears to think it has (or at least should have) power without limits (within the context of the moral law that the Church itself has established).
Power without limits? To what? Tell people that they shouldn’t have sex with anything that moves? To tell them that stealing is unacceptable? To tell them that marriage should not be redefined?

I absolutely believe the Pope is within his rights as the Vicar of Christ to tell Catholics what is and what is not moral behavior and there are no limits to this if he is seated on the Seat of Peter. However, when he is not seated on the Throne of Peter (Seat? Throne? I forget which it is exactly actually) he does not speak infallibly and the things he says can have error in them. So no, clearly he does not have UNLIMITED POWER!

It’s ridiculous to presume that he does.

Infallibility is limited to when he is speaking for Christ and the Pope does not speak for Christ at all times.

That’s what Catholics believe and we submit to his authority as the Vicar of Christ (you know, Christ, our King). As you’re not Catholic it shouldn’t bother you. 🙂
 
I didn’t say that the Catholic Church had unlimited power, I was saying that the Catholic Church appears to think it has (or at least should have) power without limits (within the context of the moral law that the Church itself has established).
First of all I think that you are confusing power with authority, even if the two terms are now commonly used as synonyms in English, in Church lingo and philosophy they are two different terms. I also think that you are confused in thinking that the Church has absolute power in terms of moral law.
If we were to use the proper language you would notice that the title of this thread is already wrong because the Church cannot prohibit (ban) the ordination of women, because the Church has no authority whatsoever in regard to the ordination of women. In the same manner the Church has no authority in regard to marriage except for the case between a man and a woman.
 
Power without limits? To what? Tell people that they shouldn’t have sex with anything that moves? To tell them that stealing is unacceptable? To tell them that marriage should not be redefined?
I absolutely believe the Pope is within his rights as the Vicar of Christ to tell Catholics what is and what is not moral behavior and there are no limits to this if he is seated on the Seat of Peter. However, when he is not seated on the Throne of Peter (Seat? Throne? I forget which it is exactly actually) he does not speak infallibly and the things he says can have error in them. So no, clearly he does not have UNLIMITED POWER!

It’s ridiculous to presume that he does.

Infallibility is limited to when he is speaking for Christ and the Pope does not speak for Christ at all times.

That’s what Catholics believe and we submit to his authority as the Vicar of Christ (you know, Christ, our King). As you’re not Catholic it shouldn’t bother you. 🙂
Exactly.
The Church reserves for itself the right to define what is right and wrong.
If most people shared that view (which is what the Church thinks would be proper) then the Catholic Church would have virtually unlimited power.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by AngryAtheist8
I have.
It tells me that no women are even allowed to become part of the Church Hierarchy.

That’s not a good example.
MENSA members are all geniuses, but the Catholic Church has both male and female members, and supposedly exists for the benefit of/to help out, both men and women.
Yet only men can be part of the Hierarchy/Leadership.

I admit that we guys have set up a sweet deal for ourselves, but that doesn’t make it fair. And I am sure that if I was a girl I would like it even less:shrug:
Well gee. I AM a woman and I don’t mind.

MENSA members are all geniuses because that was the decision of the organization.

Are you trying to tell us that the Catholic Church does not have the right to delineate its members and their roles? You, a non-Catholic, want to tell us what we may and may not do, believe, and say?:confused:

The Church is not simply a secular institution.

As a Catholic, I believe that the Church was instituted and given authority by God Himself.

I do NOT believe, as you apparently do, that the Church is simply a ‘made by men’ group with ‘made by men’ rules.

You’re right in the sense that no purely ‘secular’ group would be an equal comparison.

But say, AA. You know, Catholics are NOT the only people who believe that their Church was founded by God and who believe that the role of the priest or leader is, as given by God, for men only.

There is: The Orthodox Church.

There is: Orthodox Judaism (which of course came from classical Judaism and retains its teachings on male-only priesthood.

There are: ‘The Muslims.
The Amish.
Many fundamental, AKA "Bible believing churches’.

Historically speaking until the very recent times (within the last 40 years or so) we would have seen virtually all Protestant and Jewish groups as well.

So. . .basically your premise is that all of us have somehow gotten it ‘wrong’ all these years and we’re all too greedy (if male) and too stupid (if female) to go along with the ‘modern’ view that priesthood is ONLY a ‘role’ just like any other. . .doctor, lawyer, etc., and that women not only should but MUST have the ‘opportunity’. No matter what we believe, even if we believe that God has spoken to us. . .we cannot possibly be correct because you know better. God --in whom you do not believe–has spoken to YOU and told you, without doubt, that we are all wrong. 🤷

God–in whom WE believe–has also either not spoken to us and we’ve been greedy and stupid in making up this whole religion ‘farce’. . .or He has spoken to us but HE’s been wrong, greedy and stupid. . It seems to me that this is what you’re saying. . .although since you don’t believe in God by your own acknowledgement, it seems that you’re basically saying any of us who do believe are greedy men and stupid women who are trying to hang onto some ‘outmoded’ concepts in our outmoded idea about a god anyway, and the sooner we all die off and let people do what they want, the better. . .

Hmmm. Or He’s been right, He has spoken, and we are the ones who are listening and YOU and others have, for one reason or another, been misled.

It seems to me that a God who can rise from the dead and offer His Flesh as food and His blood as drink is far more ‘unbelievable’ than a God who isn’t politically correct and has instituted a male-only priesthood.

Have you ever stopped to consider, in your ‘male-i-tude’, that one reason God might (I say might because it is only one of many theories) have decided on a male-only priesthood was because men, those lordly beings, might really NEED to be more humble and self-sacrificing than most women?

You seem to believe priesthood is all about power and glory. You’re wrong. Being a priest is about humility and service.

Think about it, AA. As a man, historically speaking, for millennia YOU have had all the ‘possibilities’ open to you. You could be anything you want. . you could go and conquer the world, while women stayed home.

Now think about what the priesthood for the majority of men was and is.

Instead of going out and earning big bucks, you either get paid nothing --and work at hard physical labor --or you get paid a pittance, and your time is never your own.

You don’t get to have a girlfriend, a wife, children.
You have to deal calmly and lovingly with people who are hateful, lazy, insulting, nasty, spoiled and stupid. . .and these are the people who actually ACCEPT you as their priest. The ones who DON’T like or accept you are infinitely worse but the first group you are responsible for and you can’t ever run away from them.

Power? Hah. You have to consider everybody first before you. Everybody. That means if anybody at all you deal with wants something you absolutely detest, they get what they want. Some power.

You’re lonely, you’re despised. . . nowadays you mention you’re a priest and people move their children away from you, or scream and snarl about how one of YOU PEOPLE had ‘hurt’ them, their family, their neighbor, and by GOD how can you show your face among DECENT PEOPLE when you and YOUR KIND are filthy raping beasts. . .

And you have to pray for and love these people the way Jesus does. Yeah, that’s the kind of POWER most men would just love to have. . .:rolleyes:
 
Mary is not part of the Hierarchy.
On Earth at least:shrug:
What makes you think that those in Heaven are separate from those on Earth?

And yes, you do not seem to understand what a hierarchy is.

Priests are servants.

Our hierarchy is more like a lower-archy.

The more one rises in responsibility–from priest to bishop to cardinal to Pope --the more of a servant, and a servant to more and more–that one is.
 
I think that you are confused about the different hierarchies in the Catholic Church. A mother superior trumps a bishop.
I am sure that the American Nuns currently under investigation would love to know that;)

But the fact of the matter is that you’re simply wrong.

Only priests (and therefore men) are considered part of the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy. The Catholic Encyclopedia makes this clear (link to source: newadvent.org/cathen/07322c.html). Although Catholicism for Dummies (link to source: newadvent.org/cathen/07322c.html) does a better job summarizing the main points:

Practicing Catholics belong to a parish that supports the local church (where they attend Mass every week) and the clergy members who serve the congregation. The head of the parish is the pastor.

The local Catholic parish is often named after a title of the Lord Jesus Christ, such as Blessed Sacrament or Sacred Heart, or a title of the Blessed Virgin Mary, such as Our Lady of Good Counsel or Our Lady of Seven Sorrows, or after one of the saints, such as St. Ann, St. Bernadette, or St. Joseph. The parish is the heart of the diocese because it’s where most Catholics get baptized, go to confession, attend Mass, receive Holy Communion, are confirmed, get married, and are buried from.

The Catholic diocese

The pastor, and every parish priest, answers to the local bishop, who runs the diocese. The local diocese is composed of a collection of local parishes, just like a state is a collection of counties and cities. Many dioceses are comprised of several state counties, and in a few places, the entire state makes up one diocese.

You can think of a local parish like a town or city, and the local pastor is like the mayor. The diocese is like a state or province, and the bishop is like the governor. (The pope is like the prime minister, governing the entire nation, except that he governs the universal Church all over the world.)

The bishop who heads the diocese is not an ambassador of the pope but governs the local diocese as an authentic successor of the apostles, just as the pope governs the universal Church as the successor of St. Peter.

The Catholic archdiocese

An archbishop runs a really large diocese, known as an archdiocese. For example, an archbishop is given authority in each of the following archdioceses: Newark, San Francisco, Denver, Hartford, Miami, St. Louis, and Omaha. Sometimes, the archbishop is also a cardinal. Cardinals spend most of their time working in their archdioceses or in the Vatican.

The Catholic Church

The highest point in the Catholic hierarchy is, of course, the pope, who oversees the Catholic Church and its faithful from his home in the Vatican City, an independent nation situated in Rome.
 
Exactly.
The Church reserves for itself the right to define what is right and wrong.
If most people shared that view (which is what the Church thinks would be proper) then the Catholic Church would have virtually unlimited power.
You know, you’ve misjudged this more than once.

The Church does not go around defining anything.

The Church goes around proclaiming what GOD has taught and is teaching now.

None of what the Church says is based on the Church reaching out and saying, “Hey, we have DECIDED that X is wrong.”

All of what the Church says (regarding right and wrong, ie. faith and morals) is what God has said.

Power? What power?

The Church has been patiently REMINDING people of what GOD HAS SAID for 2000 years. But every individual who hears has the POWER to accept or deny that teaching of God.

Some times enough individuals listen, and follow what God says. Then YOU say, “The Church is out for power and wants people to do what IT says.” (I repeat, the Church ONLY says what GOD has already said. It doesn’t make up things on its own.)

And some times enough individuals refuse to listen and follow what God says. Then YOU say, “See, the Church is losing people and power because it is trying to force people to do what it says.”

(This way, no matter what, you have judged it’s always the Church and power struggle. But it’s not. It is the Church teaching what GOD has said, and whether people listen or not.)
 
Well gee. I AM a woman and I don’t mind.

MENSA members are all geniuses because that was the decision of the organization.

Are you trying to tell us that the Catholic Church does not have the right to delineate its members and their roles? You, a non-Catholic, want to tell us what we may and may not do, believe, and say?:confused:
:
No, I think that you have the right to believe whatever you want.
And I think that would-be women priests should acknewledge what you (and the hierarchy) believe, acknewledge what they believe, and recognize the irreconciliable differences and move on:shrug:
 
Well gee. I AM a woman and I don’t mind.

:
There are plenty of female misogynists (the most prominent one today is probably Anne Coulter, at least here in the U.S.). Heck I know someone of Mexican descent who hates Hispanics:shrug:
 
First of all I think that you are confusing power with authority, even if the two terms are now commonly used as synonyms in English, in Church lingo and philosophy they are two different terms.** I also think that you are confused in thinking that the Church has absolute power in terms of moral law.**If we were to use the proper language you would notice that the title of this thread is already wrong because the Church cannot prohibit (ban) the ordination of women, because the Church has no authority whatsoever in regard to the ordination of women. In the same manner the Church has no authority in regard to marriage except for the case between a man and a woman.
Of course the Church does.
The Church writes the official Catholic Moral Law.

The Popes and the Bishops don’t have anything like a Constitution to limit and define their powers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top