M
Maria1212
Guest
What a non-story! Why should the Pope rearrange his schedule around for a foreign diplomat? If she wants another meeting, she can request one!
Sincerely,
Maria1212
Sincerely,
Maria1212
There is a war going on in the Middle East. The foremost war ios Iraq because it draws the attention of the world, every day.From the lead paragraph…
Pope Benedict XVI refused a recent request by US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to discuss the Middle East and Iraq, Vatican sources say.
You may choose not to believe this if you wish, that’s your prerogative.
But it’s no basis for claiming that I am somehow being uncharitable because I do choose to believe it.
And your point is?From the lead paragraph…
Pope Benedict XVI refused a recent request by US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to discuss the Middle East and Iraq, Vatican sources say.
You may choose not to believe this if you wish, that’s your prerogative.
But it’s no basis for claiming that I am somehow being uncharitable because I do choose to believe it.
The reason it was considered a story is because some people wanted to read Vatican disapproval into the fact that the Pope would not meet with Sec. Rice. The Vatican has confirmed that was not the case.What a non-story! Why should the Pope rearrange his schedule around for a foreign diplomat? If she wants another meeting, she can request one!
Sincerely,
Maria1212
Try to keep up John…the Vatican confirmed that it wasn’t a snub and that he would probably meet with Sec. Rice, if she makes a request during a time the Pope is at the Vatican (he was on vacation). He also met with President Bush recently.There is a war going on in the Middle East. The foremost war ios Iraq because it draws the attention of the world, every day.
Condoleezza Rice (CR) is associated with the U.S.'s occupation and destruction of a government in Iraq. The world cannot look at CR and NOT be reminded of a war that is going on without a solution, at least, not after five years.
There is more and more enmity being built in that region on a daily basis. Other nations such as Poland, Britain and others have either withdrawn from it (War) or reduced their presence there markedly.
The Vatican is a quasi-State, it has embassies throughout the world and has a large voice in the world particularly when the Pope speaks.
Photo ops are omnipresent when heads of State or high-profile State personnages (CD) visit the Pope. There is no ignoring that CD represents U.S. policy regarding the War.
As a diplomatic move the Pope does wise in refusing to see anyone who represents a faction in this War be it from the U.S. or other nations in that “ring-of-fire.”
This is the prerogative of the Vatican. Would the Vatican receive anyone involved it could be used as a propaganda item as though the Vatican endorses one side or the other.
This is a wise move…the Church is first and foremost as far as the Holy Father is concerned. The Church is not into war, only peace.
There is a war going on in the Middle East. The foremost war ios Iraq because it draws the attention of the world, every day.
Condoleezza Rice (CR) is associated with the U.S.'s occupation and destruction of a government in Iraq. The world cannot look at CR and NOT be reminded of a war that is going on without a solution, at least, not after five years.
There is more and more enmity being built in that region on a daily basis. Other nations such as Poland, Britain and others have either withdrawn from it (War) or reduced their presence there markedly.
The Vatican is a quasi-State, it has embassies throughout the world and has a large voice in the world particularly when the Pope speaks.
Photo ops are omnipresent when heads of State or high-profile State personnages (CD) visit the Pope. There is no ignoring that CD represents U.S. policy regarding the War.
As a diplomatic move the Pope does wise in refusing to see anyone who represents a faction in this War be it from the U.S. or other nations in that “ring-of-fire.”
This is the prerogative of the Vatican. Would the Vatican receive anyone involved it could be used as a propaganda item as though the Vatican endorses one side or the other.
This is a wise move…the Church is first and foremost as far as the Holy Father is concerned. The Church is not into war, only peace.
Test everything. Retain what is good.Is this the same “left leaning” BBC which has posted non-stop news stories about “radical” mosques despite the fact that afterwards these mosques turned out to have been falsely labeled yet got not even one apology from the BBC?
Fox has had bitter spite of the Holy Father ever since he spoke out against the Iraq war and spoken in defense of Palestinian civilians.
Well the orignal “vatican source” is being beating by another “vatican source”.From the lead paragraph…
Pope Benedict XVI refused a recent request by US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to discuss the Middle East and Iraq, Vatican sources say.
You may choose not to believe this if you wish, that’s your prerogative.
But it’s no basis for claiming that I am somehow being uncharitable because I do choose to believe it.
OK. So we have dueling sources.Well the orignal “vatican source” is being beating by another “vatican source”.
We don’t have dueling sources. There was never a question that she was refused. No Vatican source has said it was anything other than the Pope’s holiday schedule. It isn’t a big deal.OK. So we have dueling sources.
Bottom line – Rice asked for an audience. She was refused. As usual, the Vatican never burns its bridges with anyone. I’m sure in the future, she will get to see the Holy Father.
Well it is a big deal to all those who seem to want to make it a big deal! However in reality He was just on Vacation! which is what I needWe don’t have dueling sources. There was never a question that she was refused. No Vatican source has said it was anything other than the Pope’s holiday schedule. It isn’t a big deal.
I agree…and I need one too!Well it is a big deal to all those who seem to want to make it a big deal! However in reality He was just on Vacation! which is what I need![]()