Pope Says There is Only One True Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter sadie2723
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
“For the Roman Pontiff, by reason of his office as Vicar of Christ, and as pastor of the entire Church has full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church, a power which he can always exercise unhindered.”

"The Roman Pontiff… as supreme pastor and teacher of all the faithful.

“The Pope enjoys, by divine institution, supreme, full, immediate, and universal power in the care of souls”
 
“For the Roman Pontiff, by reason of his office as Vicar of Christ, and as pastor of the entire Church has full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church, a power which he can always exercise unhindered.”

"The Roman Pontiff… as supreme pastor and teacher of all the faithful.

“The Pope enjoys, by divine institution, supreme, full, immediate, and universal power in the care of souls”
But then the Latin Rite began inventing doctrines, etc and lost credibility. I advise anyone to check out the Ecumenical councils and then check the dogmas developed since the Latin Rite Church went into schism from the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. :bigyikes:
I think it is only the Orthodox Church that has kept that apostlic faith.

I respect the Pope (BXVI) and think without a doubt he is a moral leader for the world.

Rev North
 
In order to preserve the Church in the purity of the faith handed on by the apostles, Christ who is Truth willed to confer on her a share in his own infallibility. By a supernatural sense of faith the People of God, under the guidance of the Church’s livi ng magisterium, unfailingly adheres to this faith,

The pastoral duty of the Magisterium is aimed at seeing to it that the People of God abides in the truth that liberates. To fulfill this service, Christ endowed the Church’ s shepherds with the charism of infallibility in matters of faith and morals

The infallibility of the Magisterium of the Pastors extends to all the elements of doctrine, including moral doctrine, without which the saving truths of the faith cannot be preserved, expounded, or observed.

The Pope and God are the same, so he has all power in heaven and earth.

The Saviour Himself is the door of the sheepfold: ‘I am the door of the sheep.’ Into this fold of Jesus Christ, no man may enter unless he be led by the Sovereign Pontiff; and only if they be united to him can men be saved, for the Roman Pontiff is the Vicar of Christ and His personal representative on earth.
 
The Pope and God are the same, so he has all power in heaven and earth.

.
Really…so the fornicating Popes, the greedy Popes are God. I don’t think you want to go there :bigyikes: because that God is not the one most Christians worship.

Pope is a man occupying a historic position. He has no infallibility (nice doctrine that was invented for power purposes). None. That was an invention long after they went into schism from the Church established by Christ and to make up for the issue of consensus that they lost.

I advise you to check out the Ecumencial Councils and see if the RCC has developed innovative dogmas since the time of the undivided Church. Just a few 😃

Please understand…I think the Pope can be a great guy and Christian leader and the Catholic denomination has done a great deal of good in the world (along with some harm but outweighed by the good).

Rev North
 
Infallibility does not involve impeccability. As all people on the face of the earth, the pope is capable of sinning and, with all other Catholics, always must repent of his sins and go to confession. As a matter of fact, the present pope goes regularly to confession. Infallibility does not mean freedom from sinning but is a special gift which Jesus left to the Catholic Church which He founded so that, by the assistance and constant presence of the Holy Spirit, she cannot officially teach error in doctrinal or moral matters. This infallibility resides in various places in the Church (for instance, in an ecumenical council when celebrated with and under the successor of St. Peter). It resides in the Bishop of Rome, the Vicar of Christ on earth, when he speaks “ex cathedra” (solemnly and officially) on matters of faith and morals. (see Matthew 16:17-19; 28:20; Mark 3:16; Luke 22:32; John 21:15-17. Consult the Catechism of the Catholic Church, numbers 552; 765; 816; 862; 1444. Also see the Dogmatic Constitution of the Church of the Second Vatican Council, numbers 18-28.



,“Furthermore, in this one Church of Christ no man can be or remain who does not accept, recognize and obey the authority and supremacy of Peter and his legitimate successors.”
(Pope Pius XI, Encyclical, Mortalium animos, January 6, 1928,

“The pope is the supreme judge of the law of the land . . . He is the vicegerent of Christ, and is not only a priest forever, but also King of kings and Lord of lords”
La Civilta Cattolica, March 18, 1871.
 
The Pope and God are the same, so he has all power in heaven and earth.

,“Furthermore, in this one Church of Christ no man can be or remain who does not accept, recognize and obey the authority and supremacy of Peter and his legitimate successors.”
(Pope Pius XI, Encyclical, Mortalium animos, January 6, 1928,

“The pope is the supreme judge of the law of the land . . . He is the vicegerent of Christ, and is not only a priest forever, but also King of kings and Lord of lords”
La Civilta Cattolica, March 18, 1871.
With respect…this is utter nonesense and blasphemus. I appreciate the quotes. There is only one King of Kings and Lord of Lords and it is not his Holiness (no matter how much I repsect the guy).

Are you putting me on (ie a Protestant). Are those quotes accurate. Forgive me, but it sounds like the stuff anti Catholics quote to prove the RCC is anti Christian (ala Jack Chick publications).

You must be having a go at me (especially with your quote (1st) and the last quote.:hmmm:

Rev North
 
Really…so the fornicating Popes, the greedy Popes are God. I don’t think you want to go there :bigyikes: because that God is not the one most Christians worship.

Pope is a man occupying a historic position. He has no infallibility (nice doctrine that was invented for power purposes). None. That was an invention long after they went into schism from the Church established by Christ and to make up for the issue of consensus that they lost.

I advise you to check out the Ecumencial Councils and see if the RCC has developed innovative dogmas since the time of the undivided Church. Just a few 😃

Please understand…I think the Pope can be a great guy and Christian leader and the Catholic denomination has done a great deal of good in the world (along with some harm but outweighed by the good).

Rev North
it is a sin to encourage someone to disobey the pope
If the person doing the encouraging in these matters is somehow the leader or superior of the one he or she is encouraging, then the mortal sin incurred is also worthy of ecclesiastical penalties. Church Law states (Canon 1373) “A person who publicly incites his or her subjects to hatred or animosity against the Apostolic See or the Ordinary because of some act of ecclesiastical authority or ministry, or one who provokes the subjects to disobedience against them, is to be punished by interdict or other just penalties.”
 
I think he´s pulling your leg.:eek:
I figured that might be the case when Fisher began implying that the Pope and God were one and the Pope had power in heaven. So I looked at his/her religion and it said (etc). Unfortunately, this is where anti Catholics look at strange quotes and go according to such and such in 18… the Pope is King of Kings and Lord of Lords.

Rev North
 
I have just read your profile and note that you ARE clergy: a Methodist Pastor.

My dear Grace Seeker, I can honestly tell you that I have never in my experience come across a Catholic Minister [Deacon upwards] who has attacked any aspect of Protestantism, much less so make fecitous comments.

On the contrary, our local Deacon apart from being the caretaker- ordained Minister for our local Methodist circuit for a year until they could appoint another Minister [following the tragic death of their own dear Minister], he is committed to supporting and building the Methodist Community.

As a former worshipper at a Methodist Chapel [after attending Sunday Mass], I got to know Methodism and Methodist Ministers pretty well. I wish therefore to go on record as saying to my fellow Catholics that the response from Grace-seeker is not typical of Methodism.

In my experience [at least in East Anglia UK], Methodist’s are conspicous by charity and love towards non-Methodists and that also include Catholics.
Yes, I am a pastor. And you are right, in more than 25 years of cooperative ecumenical ministry with Roman Catholics (priests, nuns, and laity) I have never come across anyone who has attacked any aspect of Protestantism, including none who have tried to besmirch Luther as you did. So, why do I continually meet Catholics who seek to do so on this board.

I came here originally to find out the answer to one question regarding Catholicism, but I have learned things about the Catholic view towards Protestants that I never would have known by the conversations I have with Catholics in face-to-face meetings. So, do all Catholics think so poorly and negative toward Protestants as you do? Do all Catholics want to accuse Luther of terrible sins. I can understand that you wouldn’t like have your own flaws pointed out. And I accept that my own denomination has its share of problems too. Just 3 months ago we had to remove a man in my state from serving as pastor for moral cause. The thing is we actually removed him, we didn’t simply move him to another place to repeat his actions, that is my concern with the stories coming out of the Catholic Church. It isn’t the individual priests, but the institutional sins that are so troubling.

(continued below)
 
Now, Sixtus, if you think I went too far in my criticism or levelied it unfairly, I apologize. The deal is we all, Catholics, Lutherans, Methodist, have plenty of dirty laundry. Let’s say that Luther was the biggest scoundrel ever, that doesn’t make him wrong for calling the Catholic church on its moral corruption in his day. (He wasn’t the only one after all, he just did it with the loudest voice.) And let’s say that he went about it in the wrong way, that doesn’t mean that his points of contention were in error. And let’s say that it would have been better if he had stayed than leaving. That doesn’t make those who are in the descendant protestant groups today the enemy. And that is how we get treated here.

I can appreciate that all Catholics will toe the party line. That appears to be a big part of what it means to be Catholic. And of course, if you didn’t think the same as the Catholic church you no doubt would leave and go some place else. But to go so far as to deny the validity of the experiences of other ecclesiastical communities, to see them and talk about them as lesser in their relationship with God – and while that is not what I get from my neighborhood priest, it is what I see over and over and over again on threads such as this one. (I could list them, but there is a size limit to these posts that I’m already exceeding, so as to have to make two posts.)

In my last parish, the Catholic church was so small that it closed its worship center and merged with the one in the next town. But we had always cooperated with them, and because of the positive relationships we had with one another, they wanted us to have the Stations of the Cross that had been used there. We installed them at my church were we continued to walk the stations of the cross each Lent. In my new community it is the priest and I who together designed our ecumenical Thanksgiving, Good Friday, and World Day of Prayer services for the entire community. But then we see each other as full brothers in the faith.

What do you see? You aren’t willing to consider us a brothers in the same way those who live in my community are. No in this virtual community, I’m just another wearer of Orange. I’m the enemy to be attacked, put down, told that my church isn’t good enough to be considered any better than a seperated brother, and that it isn’t a real church at all. That anyone who disagrees and interprets biblical truths differently, doesn’t just see things differently, but is actually wrong and doesn’t know anything about church history

Not only do you (speaking not of you personally, but the Catholics representatives as a whole that I have met on this forum) believe your interpreation is the right one, but the only possible one to even be considered. And many defend their positions vociferously even when I am quote none other than the Pope himself, because it seems that as long as the idea is expressed by a Protestant it isn’t worth considering.

You want a different response from me than what you’ve gotten, then start treating me and other Protestants here in the manner those Catholic ministers you speak of treat people in person. And you might begin by NOT taking potshots at people like Luther when whether or not he chose to get married after being kicked out of the Catholic church is completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand. It is just an ad hominem argument, of which my comment was sadly more of the same.

I regret my comment, for it didn’t add anything to the conversation. What would? Getting back to the issue of how the Catholic church sees itself as the only expression of the body of Christ in this world. Luther was a part of the body of Christ. I know, because he was Catholic. If Luther was still accountable to those vows he took once have been kicked out of the church, that implies that Luther was still accountable to Christ, so he therefore belonged to Christ. If he still belonged to Christ, then he was a part of the body of Christ. And if Luther was part of the body of Christ, but not a part of the Catholic church, then one does not need to be part of the Catholic church to be a member of the body of Christ today either.
 
Grace-seeker posted:
So,** do all Catholics think so poorly and negative toward Protestants as you do?**
My emphasis

That is not a question, it is a rhetorical statement for dramtic literary effect.

It is also false in its entirety. There is not one post on this Forum from me which is negative towards my dear Protestant [Muslim or any other] brothers and sisters. Find me one post on this forum, just one which evidences your claim!

Of course you will not find one because there aren’t any. So why do you ask questions in an attempt to slander and discredit!

That is what I criticised in you original post when you made a statement which appeared to ask a question but then went on to provide the answer which supported your position to the detriment of Catholicism when there is no substance to the criticism, much less so evidence to back it up.

On the contrary, you will find my posts towards fellow Protestants [Muslims and others] are positive, using language which aims to unify, build-up and reconcile. My posts on ‘seperated brethren’ where my emphasis is on ‘bretheren’ not ‘separated’.

That in my painful experience is a classic tactic of the Orange Order to discredit Catholics who are working for unity and bring them into disrepute.
 
Grace-seeker posted:
You aren’t willing to consider us a brothers in the same way those who live in my community are
I invite you into my home. My wife and I join you in worship. I tell you ‘my door is always open to you’.

We affectionately know our Methodist Community intimately. We actively promote unity brotherly [and sisterly] love between Catholics and Methodists. [We are not alone in this]. We plan religious, social and wider community events together,

We often speak of the many excellent sermons we have heard. Some of the best sermons I have ever heard and those with the longest memory trace came from Methodist preachers.

We have made long-term friends [lost one over a year ago and not got over the sad loss yet] with the Methodist Community.

We see you as fellow brothers and sisters in Christ where the emphasis is on ‘brethren’ not ‘separated’. We even contribute towards the maintenance of your Chapel. We carefully and thoughtfully tend the gardens at our own expense. What more can we do!

What must we do to make you consider us as seeing you as brothers in the same way those who live in my community do!

Your apology is accepted and in turn offer my apologies if you thought I was being uncharitable which was not my intention.
 
I thought Luther was an Augustinian friar prior to becoming a heretic? That means he would have taken vows of chastity.
Certainly. I was not challenging the claim that he broke his vows, only that he was motivated to do so by some particular romantic attachment. Obviously, as Luther himself admitted, he was made of flesh and blood and had sexual desires. But there is no evidence that he had any particular personal difficulty with celibacy (more than any other normal man), and there is no evidence that he was “in love with” Katie von Bora. He decided that given his own principles, it was time to get married, and Katie was a suitable, eligible (from his point of view) woman.

By the way, respectable families were often unwilling to let their daughters marry ex-priests and ex-monks. The stigma of being a “priest’s woman” hung around for quite a while. That’s one of the reasons Luther married an ex-nun.

Luther had been denying the validity of vows of celibacy for several years before he put his own principles into practice. The idea that Luther was driven to his theological positions by lust or romantic love is simply malicious speculation without evidence. Once he had firmly convinced himself and others around him that marriage was legitimate, he naturally proceeded to get married.

I do not defend this position–I think he should have remained faitful to his vows. But given his theological views, it was the appropriate thing to do (the problem is that his theological views were wrong on this point, as on many others).

Edwin
 
Wikipedia…hehe
I did not see any mention of Luther being “in love with” Katharina von Bora in the wikipedia article. Are you sure you didn’t read that into the article due to your cultural assumptions about why people get married?

Edwin
 
I did not see any mention of Luther being “in love with” Katharina von Bora in the wikipedia article. Are you sure you didn’t read that into the article due to your cultural assumptions about why people get married?

Edwin
SInce this topic is not about Martin Luther, I hold no respect for a man who divided himself against God’s Church. He is like Korah, who rebelled against Moses and Aaron. He is an Anti-Semitic. Compared to all other Christians saints, he is no saint. Martin Luther was nothing more than a heretic.
 
SInce this topic is not about Martin Luther, I hold no respect for a man who divided himself against God’s Church. He is like Korah, who rebelled against Moses and Aaron. He is an Anti-Semitic. Compared to all other Christians saints, he is no saint. Martin Luther was nothing more than a heretic.
Which meaning of saint are you using?
 
SInce this topic is not about Martin Luther, I hold no respect for a man who divided himself against God’s Church. He is like Korah, who rebelled against Moses and Aaron. He is an Anti-Semitic. Compared to all other Christians saints, he is no saint. Martin Luther was nothing more than a heretic.
Ahhhh you mean like the Pope that split himself and the Latin Church off from the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church (continued as the Orthodox Church). The RCC was born in schism so why condemn Dr. Luther who followed the example already set.

Plus while there is much mixed about him he did cause the church to look at its own corruption and have a counter reformation (so a nun Professor of mine said).

Rev North
 
Why do you call Jesus the Savior when you have to save yourself?
Catholicism teaches the sinner must “make satisfaction for” or “expiate” his sins. This satisfaction is also called “penance.” (1459; “In this way they attained their own salvation and cooperated in saving their brothers” (1477). God’s Word proclaims “There is salvation in no one else; for there is no other name under heaven given among men, b; which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12).

DLC
 
Most Protestants really pay little attention to the Catholic churches claims. The Protestant understanding of what the church is differs from the Catholics understanding…it’s approached from different angles.
I would beg to differ. Many Protestants pay a great deal of attention to what the Catholic Church does. Their websites and forums prove this.
After centuries of the RCC making the claim, most Protestants are not too concerned…only on this forum is it ever discussed, Catholics seem more concerned of the claim than Protestants.
I might suggest that you “broaden your horizons” and spend some time wandering about on other sites. While the question of what the Pope recently said…has created a bit of a buzz lately, what you will find on most “Protestant sites” are direct and incessant attacks on the Catholic Church that are rife with lies, deception and false information.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top