Portland fatal shooting victim's friend: ‘They executed my partner. They hunted him down'

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Victoria33 said:
And much can be written about Sanger in a number of ways.
Click to expand...
…and none of it has any relevance to Planned Parenthood today, except the view to make contraceptives available. That is about all that remains of Margaret Sanger’s legacy.
Victoria33 said:
From the article:
Click to expand...
The article is in the opinion sections of USA today, so keep that in mind when reading it.
Victoria33 said:
But if Sanger was against abortion, we know the Democrats are for abortion
Click to expand...
That is a valid criticism of Democrats.
and 1/3rd of abortions are of African Americans. Sounds pretty racist.
Click to expand...
It would be if the abortions were forced, as they were in China. Even today there are places nations with racist policies force abortions to accomplish those policies. That is not the case the US. The fact that 1/3 of the abortions are of blacks is because of the choices being made by the blacks.
 
Victoria33 said:
40.png
LeafByNiggle:
The indications are that he was part of a white supremacist group.
Click to expand...
No, there is no proof.
Click to expand...
Here you go:

 
Cathoholic said:
Thanks for that information Victoria33.

( I did not bother to look it up because it is irrelevant to Leaf’s argument. It is not OK to murder racist people of ANY color because they are racists.
I was surprised Leaf used that excuse.
But it is good to know the victim was NOT involved in racism even if it is irrelevant to Leaf’s argument.)
Click to expand...
Correct, I believe the Democrats are inseparable from a racist past, even a racist present day but it would not be a rationale for committing violence.
 
LeafByNiggle said:
It would be if the abortions were forced, as they were in China. Even today there are places nations with racist policies force abortions to accomplish those policies. That is not the case the US. The fact that 1/3 of the abortions are of blacks is because of the choices being made by the blacks.
Click to expand...
I follow Vatican teaching, that is not to support those who enable abortion. I would say clearly, the Democrats enable abortion, support Planned Parenthood and so on. So, the Vatican finds there are big problems with those who even make abortion available. Your view is just to blame the woman for it? Okay to support enablers of abortion? I don’t agree with that, kicking the can down the road. Someone is making it available. The church acknowledges that is wrong.

Eucharist denial to Catholic politicians over abortion - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

I think we have been through this before.

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/c...ith_doc_19741118_declaration-abortion_en.html
  1. It must in any case be clearly understood that whatever may be laid down by civil law in this matter, man can never obey a law which is in itself immoral, and such is the case of a law which would admit in principle the liceity of abortion. Nor can he take part in a propaganda campaign in favor of such a law, or vote for it. Moreover, he may not collaborate in its application. It is, for instance, inadmissible that doctors or nurses should find themselves obliged to cooperate closely in abortions and have to choose between the law of God and their professional situation
Click to expand...
So, I’m not even going to collaborate in its application.
 
Cathoholic said:
Your premise has a WRONG built-in presupposition.
Click to expand...
You mean FOX does. From the original article:
Members of Patriot Prayer and Antifa have repeatedly clashed in Portland in recent years with many confrontations turning violent.
Click to expand...
As I did not make any other assumption, there is no other presupposition. However, you did. Since the victim was white, it might be easier to believe that the shooting was “in cold blood,” but I find it ironic the quite reasonable doubt given when it is a black victim and the family claims he was gunned down. Then, it is easy to take the cautious approach to await for facts. Yet with a white victim, it is assumed that his friend’s story is the true one.

If one allows the color of the victim to determine whether one believes the narrative of friends and families, that is systemic racism.
 
Or just a distrust in the mainstream media since their repeated and flagrant dishonesty has rendered them enemies of the people.
 
Distrust of the media, meaning trying to read past opinion to fact, is very useful, but it is useless if only applied selectively, while feeding oneself on groupthink lies. Look at how many times total junky alt-right sites are posted here, as if they were news. It is better to stick with FOX or CNN and sift through the lesser bias.
 
Last edited:
pnewton . . .
You mean FOX does. From the original article
Click to expand...
No I don’t mean “Fox does”.

This guy was murdered.

Just because a group he belonged to,
has had clashes with leftists
who have been doing everything they can to instigate such clashes and still are,
does not mean it is OK to murder people in cold blood.

If half of what the eye-witness account said is true,
this was an execution.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top