J
JaneFrances
Guest
LOL. . .I think your statement actually demonstrates why i use the Socratic method to understand first what a person says and second whether it is true. For, as you might see, what you wrote is both vague and ambiguous, which makes it easy for me to misunderstand you. Please allow me to demonstrate:
You wrote:
I will continue this conversation with the prayer that nothing gets lost in the pomp!I believe your statement is vague, because you do not say exactly what i am doing that constitutes pomp. Is it my choice of words that is pomp? or my method of asking questions? or my insistence that i cannot know what Jesus said until i know the meaning of each word that he used?
I believe your statement is ambiguous, because the word pomp has two different meanings, which give your statement a completely different meaning depending on what definition we apply. For the word pomp, my small dictionary tells me, can mean:1. A magnificent and majestic display.
or2. An ostentatious or pretentious or artificial or pompous display. Hence, i can take your statement to be one of admiration or one where you think me a pompous arse! Seeing that this is the case, i think it wise for me to ask questions to be sure i understand what you mean, don’t you? Were i to find you to mean (1) then i would ask what you admire most, my method or my use of words or my tenacity of determining the exact meaning of Christ’s words.
If i to find you to mean (2) i would have to decide whether or not to defend my character by explaining why i have adopted the language, or method, or perseverance for the truth. Then again, i could just overlook your words, giving you the benefit of the doubt and blushing over my assumption that you admire my words or intelligence or character. This, in fact, is the course i will take, unless you actually think me a pompous arse and want to prove it to everyone else, in which case i will be happy to engage the debate that my intentions and method are, i hope, good (though, i admit, not perfectly so).
Please understand that i am not, as my son says, dising you. I often write and say things that are vague or ambiguous for the sake of being concise. What i am saying is that, when the statement a person makes is important, it is best for me to ask questions to make sure i understand.
===============================
Do you Jane see how important the meaning of words are to me? My misunderstanding one four-letter word you wrote can result in grave misrepresentation of your entire meaning. However, if you do not think me wise in insisting on the importance of knowing the definition of words, consider the words of the wise:
Words - so innocent and powerless as they are, as standing in a dictionary, how potent for good and evil they become in the hands of one who knows how to combine them.- Nathaniel Hawthorne, 1804 - 1864Dictionary: The universe in alphabetical order.- Anatole France, 1844 - 1924If you have a big enough dictionary, just about everything is a word.- Dave BarryThe greatest masterpiece in literature is only a dictionary out of order.- Jean Cocteau, 1798 - 1863When i read something too difficult for me, i keep a dictionary by my side. Sometimes i look up even words i think i understand and find that they have other definitions i never considered (such as the word pomp). You see, if i misunderstand even one word of what you write, i can completely misunderstand you. The same is true of Jesus’ words, isn’t it? If you or i misunderstand one word He says, we risk misunderstanding Him. That’s a risk i’m not willing to take. I hope you can appreciate why i’m asking what each word He spoke means when He said:
“Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.”
I will continue this conversation with the prayer that nothing gets lost in the business of formalities!
I suppose, at best, my usage was lazy. At worst, Freudian.
Forgive me. Let’s move on. I’m interested to know better your understanding of “positionally perfect” and your responses to that which I’ve already offered.