Practically speaking, don't we need to "test drive the car before we buy it?"

  • Thread starter Thread starter CaliLobo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
WOW. :eek:

I thought this thread was about test driving cars, so I hadn’t read it!

I especially like the unmarried people telling married people about successful marriages and sexual compatibility. :rolleyes:

I know you guys are hurting and trying to navigate your way through this, but come on. You are going to marry a person. You are going to hold her hair out of the toilet when she is throwing up from morning sickness. She is going to help you get home all groggy and bleeding after having your wisdom teeth out. You will laugh together, cry together, build a family together.

The sex part is important, but it’s not as important as you guys make it out to be.
👍

Yes. I’ve been reading through this thread and this post really says it best.

Yes, the sex is great. But really? Sex pales in comparison to the fact that my husband made dinner since I didn’t feel well. Or that he took dance lessons because I wanted to learn. Or that he hugged me and held me when my parents died. That is what is important in marriage.
 
I know thanks to the book “I Kissed Dating Goodbye,” many Protestants in my age range have stunted growth when it comes to relationships. The book was written to protect people from sexual sin, but no one anticipated that there would be people well into their 30s, who are mostly living the “right way,” who are still looking to find their first official relationship, but are awkward as to how.
I am going to throw this out there, and you guys can take it for what it’s worth. There are a certain number of men and women who are socially awkward, and no matter which “system” they use to find their mate, they will have an uphill battle.

I’m not being mean, I’m just making an observation. Loosen up, live your life. Be someone you would like to know.
 
This is under the premise that I have made mistakes in the fanciful ‘new extreme’ you’re talking about. Such mistakes don’t exist in my life. The quantity of wrong versus right has been a tremendous improvement I assure you. It’s contrary to the lack of progress you seem bent on proving.

Then again, you don’t know me personally so I you’re really just arguing with me based on conjecture. 🤷
Viewing dating as a game of manipulation is a mistake. Seeing as you have made it very clear that is what you currently do and secular sources have led you to do my claim is not based on conjecture at all.

Look, I’m gonna be honest, I am very glad that you were able to fix the mistakes of the old extreme you were in (being passive, unconfident, unassertive etc), and if secular sources are helping you there? thats great.There’s nothing wrong with following good advice, no matter where it comes from. The problem is sorting out the good advice from the bad. I’m trying to help you with that as best as I can, but, obviously, its up to you to decide what you think about my advice and act accordingly. I only know what life has taught me. I know that if I had viewed dating as a game of manipulation or if I was convinced I needed to “test-drive” potential spouses I would not have had the mindset which has allowed me to have the wonderful and happy marriage that I do to an amazing and loving man. There is plenty of good advice in secular sources,** of course** thats true, but the mentality of viewing dating as a manipulative game, of boosting your ego by being able to brag about being good in bed, and of requiring a “test-drive” are nothing like the mentality which is necessary to build a stable and happy married life. Take it or leave it of course, but that is my advice based on my life experience. 🤷
What you’re doing is basically trying to get an alcoholic to drink again with the naive hopes that they can do it in moderation. Do you accuse them of throwing the baby out with the bathwater when they refuse? 🤷
Did you honestly think that telling someone to be true to themselves is going to magically make them go along the Catholic path of romantic righteousness? On the contrary, when I finally became more honest about what I wanted, much of it really went against the Catholic grain inside.
I think you have confused actual Catholic teaching with the bad advice and personal opinions of Catholics that you know and so now are rejecting anything with the name Catholic on it out of fear that it will be like the bad advice that ended up leading you to losing the girl you wanted. Its an overreaction, an understandable one, given where you are, but still an overreaction. 🤷
I’ll believe this when people who share your view manage to bring back what I lost. You want to use the bathwater baby analogy? I did that with regards to the game of which you shun. I thought myself as above the game too, that it didn’t have any place in my life.
Enter one hunchbacked mook who played it like a noob and he still beat me to the punch. Because I was told to shun any affiliation with the game (including advice that could’ve helped me), I nearly bled my soul dry.
Well, I won’t tell you to shun anything that has any connection even remotely, to “the game”. Like I said, there is plenty of good secular dating advice, but there is also bad advice mixed in. What I have been telling you is that the mentality of viewing dating as a game of manipulation is not helpful to the goal of being happily married. There is a very real and distinct difference.
You say I’m doing the same to Catholicism. Well unfortunately for you, the evidence of my failure was still clear to me back then. I knew I was ignoring sound advice for fear of violating some old, medieval principle that was rooted in my religious convictions. (“Let go and let God!” “You’ll find somebody!” “Just be patient!” “Don’t look too hard!”) You can say that it may have not been the Catholic way but your words don’t offer anything that will help me out of my situation now.
No, of course my words can’t fix what happened in the past. All I can do is try to help you avoid making more errors in the future. Which is what I am attempting to do by warning you to be careful of throwing out everything even remotely attached to Catholicism. Being extreme tends to lead to mistakes. Just as you being overly extreme and rejecting anything that had a semblance of being secular dating advice led to you making mistakes in the past, you being extreme and rejecting anything that has a semblance of being related to Catholicism is going to end up leading to you making more mistakes.
I’ll believe in the Catholic way again if your version of it actually delivers on what I’ve been asking your God. You keep thinking that I’m not giving Catholicism a chance. I suggest you stop that. The religion has all the chance in the world. I’m not closed off. I’ve just opened myself wide to everything else outside it. 👍 (No matter how much other Catholics beg me not to.)
I’m not begging you to do anything. I’m just letting you know that I think its a mistake to reject actual Church teaching simply because some Catholics personal opinions led to your suffering. If you post your opinions online you can expect others to respond with their own. Just because they disagree with you does not mean they are begging.
Again: Prove it. Or at the very least, pray to your God that somebody in your camp restores what I lost. Until then, I’m not buying.
 
I have seen the comment elsewhere (in Doctor Nerdlove’s comment threads) that what actually works in the PUA approach is asking lots of different people. There’s a strong critique out there of the other PUA techniques and philosophy which is worth looking at. It can be very “canned.” (Oh my gosh–using magic tricks to attract women–how old are these women–8? My husband once did a pretty good amateur magic show for a group of 6 or 7-year-old girls, and it was a very tough crowd.)

If you take 5 years working up the confidence to ask one woman out, of course your chances of a serious relationship are considerably worse than if you ask a different one out every month.

I’ve seen the criticism of PUA that they believe in their techniques, whereas their techniques only “work” on a small minority of women. What does the work for them is the sheer numbers. PUA guys are blind to the fact that with those kind of numbers, they could probably just start showing pictures of their adorable infant nephews or sonorously reciting Hamlet and do just as well–maybe even meet a better class of woman.

I would definitely recommend looking up what non-PUA people say about PUA. (I found a good one by googling doctor nerdlove and pua entitled “The Trouble with PUA”, but I’m not giving the link, because the PUA material quoted was very, very creepy.)
Also this. 👍
 
What I’ve read here is…well, let me call it amusing.

Best way to turn off a woman (or anyone):
Whine about yourself all the time
Be so self absorbed you hardly know she’s there and then rant when she decides not to be. Maybe she got tired of hearing you talk about yourself.

Post utterly juvenile ideas (like trying to figure out how to manipulate women and test drive them), then lash out at people who take issue with such ideas for being “old”.

Whine about wanting to get married and not finding a mate, and then when married people offer advice, tell them you know more than they do about it (in spite of the fact that you can’t get a date).

Say you reject Catholicism until “it delivers” what you want. (Same attitude might be evident to the ladies you meet.)

Then after all that…blame your religion for your inability to get a date.

Just sayin’…it’s not hard to see why you can’t get a date. And it ain’t your religion.

I suggest you get outside yourself, do some volunteer work, find some interest other than your own sad belly button. You’ll be instantly more attractive. And you might meet someone along the way to develop a friendship with. I suggest not telling her you want a test drive.

Newsflash: There’s hardly anyone walking around who hasn’t been shot down by someone they thought they were in love with. You’re just not that special.
 
Sorry, but I have to say that the very idea of “taking someone for a test drive” speaks volumes of a fundamental disregard for the dignity of the other person.
NO WONDER someone with that mentality isn’t finding much in the way of fulfilling relationships.
 
I am going to throw this out there, and you guys can take it for what it’s worth. There are a certain number of men and women who are socially awkward, and no matter which “system” they use to find their mate, they will have an uphill battle.

I’m not being mean, I’m just making an observation. Loosen up, live your life. Be someone you would like to know.
Yes.

And obvious systems are a turn off. (“And now it’s time to do a neg!”) I suspect that within a few years, as PUA systems become more well known, they’re going to be less and less successful. It’s like over-fishing–you can fish your heart out and do great, as long as everybody else isn’t doing exactly the same thing.
 
Newsflash: There’s hardly anyone walking around who hasn’t been shot down by someone they thought they were in love with.
Yes.

I spent 7th grade-11th grade pining for a boy and then freshman year through probably first half of senior year of college pining for a different boy. It was pretty much nonstop pining from about age 12 to age 19. Then (among other things) there was an ill-advised boyfriend and then after I split up with him (and it was a very lucky escape–he had wanted us to get married) I pined for the guy I had broken up with for another two years.

And then I met my future husband and I haven’t pined for anybody since.

Unrequited love is pretty much the human condition–until you find requited love.
 
Yes.

I spent 7th grade-11th grade pining for a boy and then freshman year through probably first half of senior year of college pining for a different boy. It was pretty much nonstop pining from about age 12 to age 19. Then (among other things) there was an ill-advised boyfriend and then after I split up with him (and it was a very lucky escape–he had wanted us to get married) I pined for the guy I had broken up with for another two years.

And then I met my future husband and I haven’t pined for anybody since.

Unrequited love is pretty much the human condition–until you find requited love.
Nicely said.
If I met someone who said he/she had won every heart sought, I’d find them highly suspect.
 
But aren’t “good sex” and “bad sex” subjective judgments based on one’s own expectations?

Without getting graphic, it has seemed to me that most men and women are pretty sexually charged, just naturally, particularly when they’re young. From that point, it’s a matter of learning likes and dislikes, isn’t it? And that’s a mutual discovery sort of thing.
I think it is a bit more problematic than that. Without getting graphic there are a lot of details in this area that could provide a great boost or a great strain in a marriage. More importantly, while sex isn’t the only concern there is the problem that It presents an important area of compatibility that neither person would know about.

What if one believed they had a certain appetite but then discovered it to be completely different than expected?
 
Just sayin’…it’s not hard to see why you can’t get a date. And it ain’t your religion.

I suggest you get outside yourself, do some volunteer work, find some interest other than your own sad belly button. You’ll be instantly more attractive. And you might meet someone along the way to develop a friendship with. I suggest not telling her you want a test drive.

Newsflash: There’s hardly anyone walking around who hasn’t been shot down by someone they thought they were in love with. You’re just not that special.
:clapping::clapping:
 
Of course the Bible says that sex outside of marriage is a sin.

But we know that sex is a major issue that can make or break a marriage. It is important for people to know what their partners like and don’t like in sex, and how much libido their partners have. We know that a marriage that is not open to life is also a sin, in Catholicism. We know that lack of sex, or bad sex, can ruin relationships and destroy marriages.

So practically speaking, despite what the Bible says, don’t people need to “test drive the car before they buy it,” in other words, have sex before marriage to test each other’s sexual compatibility? Isn’t it a foolish risk to not “test drive a car before buying it?” Wouldn’t it be a possible setup for failure to not have sex before marriage?

Let’s discuss.
yes, it is absolutely necessary to test drive a car before purchasing it.

Human beings are not cars and no one is buying anybody.

As important a topic as sexual intimacy is, I do believe it is important for people to talk about this subject, perhaps during pre-marriage preparation, in a safe setting.

However, pre marital sex?

nah…
 
People who criticize Christians for being naive and not “test-driving the car before buying it” aren’t criticizing the no-sex before marriage rule as much as they are the permanence of marriage.

Let’s suppose people are right, if you don’t have sex with your partner before marriage, you won’t know if you are compatible (bad match in libido, chemistry, etc. - although, I contend, you can figure a lot of this stuff out through communication while dating, without the actual sex part). The implication is: something doesn’t match up in sex life, shouldn’t be married.

But, as others have pointed out, for those who do test drive the car and decide it’s “all systems go” this car goes “0 to 60 in no time flat” and “leaves the garage just as often as I want it to,” and decide to buy the car (“why buy the car, if they will let you drive stick for free, right?”) that most likely will not be true all throughout marriage.

At some point, the systems aren’t all go, or the car can’t get to 60 quite so fast (or often enough), or that car just doesn’t look quite as shiny as that new car at the dealership (ok, enough bad car analogies, you get the point). What happens then? If your motto is, need to test drive the car to see if we are sexually compatible for marriage, then once that compatibility goes away, the logic is time to end the marriage. It is those backwards Christians that insist, even if it’s not “all systems go,” the marriage vows you say mean what they mean, and it’s not time to quit the marriage. That is, I’m convinced, what modern society is really objecting to.

This is one of the reasons why I think it is no coincidence that those who cohabitate before marriage (even when controlling the data for intensity of religious belief) are more likely to divorce. If you go into marriage with the mindset that permanent “sexual compatibility” is necessary for marriage to be worthwhile, once that goes away, then it is more likely you will abandon the marriage.

I don’t want to dismiss suggestions that emotional, romantic, physical compatibility are important. But, as others have pointed at, the level at which you need to establish that can be obtained before marriage through communication, dating, kissing, etc. When you are a 25 year old guy (I can only speak for young men discerning marriage, because that is my experience), whether you have sex or not, it’s not that hard to figure out if you are sexually into (compatible with) your fiance. It’s just not.
 
PUA lines and systems aren’t worth spit … that said, that doesn’t mean that everything written on those sites is bad. There are definitely useful bits of advice here and there. The problem is that bashing the sources usually means bashing everything that came from them. Or the commenters are so “creepy” as to automatically invalidate every last word uttered on every one of those sites. That kind of bashing is readily found on CAF, don’t have to go far looking for it. Believe it or not, those sources have very useful bits that are seldom found in Catholic or Christian dating advice for men. The trick is to separate the wheat from the chaff, and to keep your Catholicism in front of you as you do so. Keep what is good and compatible with Catholicism and toss the rest.

To illustrate, I’ll help you with some examples of excellent advice for men that are compatible with being a Catholic man, but are definitely not found in any Catholic or Christian dating advice aimed at men:

One that I mentioned earlier: look to a woman’s actions as far more representative of her true feelings than her words when her word and actions do not align. That was one of the very best and most valuable lessons I ever learned.

Another one: “just be yourself” as often advocated on Catholic or Christian guides for men (and to be fair, most secular guides as well) is really, really bad advice … if “yourself” behaves like a nice guy who supplicates a lot and operates on covert contracts. But there is nothing in Catholic or Christian dating advice for men about “nice” guys and how not to be one. Or how to be “good” and Christian and manly and not “nice” at the same time. There’s a devout male Christian blogger I like who is trying to fill that gap; he firmly believes that “nice” guys are in sin for being that way. I don’t know that I’d phrase it like that, but he makes good arguments for his position.

A third one: Paul truly understood the nature of men and women when he called on men to love their wives and wives to respect their husbands. Why did Paul put the words “love” and “respect” this way? After all, he did not say, men respect your wives. A good discussion right there. But the flip side that is seldom discussed in Catholic or Christian advice for men in a realistic way: what are practical ways for a man to maintain his wife’s respect and why that is so vital to the health of the marriage in a social environment that encourages divorce.

One more: while there is considerable disagreement among secular men’s blogs on what men should say and do around women, there is actually a fair amount of agreement on what behaviors men should avoid because they are almost always unattractive to women. What they’re saying is that not doing X, Y and Z, etc., can go a long way toward avoiding turning a woman off too soon, and a Catholic man would do well to follow this too. Some of those behaviors have been discussed in this thread. Here’s a short, abbreviated list:
  • don’t be indecisive.
  • don’t slouch. fix your posture.
  • don’t dress or groom like a slob.
  • don’t let yourself go physically.
  • banish verbal place holders like “umm”, “aah”, “ehh” and/or “uhh” from your conversations
  • don’t whine, moan or complain in the presence of women you don’t know well or are just beginning to date.
  • don’t let a woman’s poor conduct go without a response.
There are more “don’t do this” tips, but that will do for starters. I probably violated every one of these and more in my college days and I can say that getting rid of such unattractive behaviors really helped me a lot. Especially since I’m not good looking and I’m very introverted means I don’t get out among the women like the extroverts do so I have to make my interactions count for something and these unattractive behaviors are all fixable, even for introverts like me. But Catholic dating advice doesn’t go very deeply into this if at all.
 
I’m pretty sure that if you approach marriage as if it were a consumer product you are considering acquiring, you’re missing the point and are going to fail at it.

The sexual union of man and wife is a physical manifestation of the deeper union between them. Passing that around deprives the sexual union of it’s greatest bonding potential. Instead of being a unique bond shared exclusively between a man and wife, it is reduced to merely a self-oriented occasion of pleasure (not coincidentally like most consumer products, thus the “test drive” mentality).

Sins are things that actually damage us. They aren’t actions arbitrarily placed on a list. God knows how we work, what makes us thrive and what destroys us. And since He loves us, He’s given us some pretty handy hints and the amazing gifts of forgiveness and healing when we’re too stupid to listen. (Which in my case is all too often…)
 
PUA lines and systems aren’t worth spit … that said, that doesn’t mean that everything written on those sites is bad. There are definitely useful bits of advice here and there.

**I’ve seen quotes where a PUA guru was essentially telling men to commit sexual assault and coerce women into unwanted sexual contact. OK–here’s the link:

doctornerdlove.com/2013/06/trouble-pick-up-artists/**

“On Wednesday, a Kickstarter project for a self-published book on picking up women entitled “Above The Game” started rocketing across blogs and Twitter. The author, a regular poster on r/seduction, a sub-Reddit dedicated to exchanging tips on meeting and hooking up with women, was looking for $2,000. He ended up getting over $16,000 – mostly from Redditors. Nothing terribly interesting in and of itself. The samples of his advice he was giving…”

**CAFers, you can read the sample at your peril. Don’t say you weren’t warned.

This is well beyond the “look nice, smell nice, have good posture, smile and have good eye contact” advice you can read anywhere.**

One that I mentioned earlier: look to a woman’s actions as far more representative of her true feelings than her words when her word and actions do not align. That was one of the very best and most valuable lessons I ever learned.

**That’s genuinely useful, but you can hear it elsewhere. It is actually a Maya Angelou quote I’ve seen bandied around: ““When someone shows you who they are believe them.”

It’s equally useful for women who forgive anything when accompanied by the right kind of sweet-talking. **

Another one: “just be yourself” as often advocated on Catholic or Christian guides for men (and to be fair, most secular guides as well) is really, really bad advice … if “yourself” behaves like a nice guy who supplicates a lot and operates on covert contracts.

Agreed. I would definitely not say, “Be yourself!” to a guy, not knowing anything about his appearance, personality or general situation.

A third one: Paul truly understood the nature of men and women when he called on men to love their wives and wives to respect their husbands. Why did Paul put the words “love” and “respect” this way? After all, he did not say, men respect your wives. A good discussion right there. But the flip side that is seldom discussed in Catholic or Christian advice for men in a realistic way: what are practical ways for a man to maintain his wife’s respect and why that is so vital to the health of the marriage in a social environment that encourages divorce.

**Not something you’ll find in the PUA community proper, but I agree that Athol Kay is actually pretty good, although the idea of keeping divorce hanging over the other’s head is bound to get a little old.

**

One more: while there is considerable disagreement among secular men’s blogs on what men should say and do around women, there is actually a fair amount of agreement on what behaviors men should avoid because they are almost always unattractive to women. What they’re saying is that not doing X, Y and Z, etc., can go a long way toward avoiding turning a woman off too soon, and a Catholic man would do well to follow this too. Some of those behaviors have been discussed in this thread. Here’s a short, abbreviated list:
  • don’t be indecisive.
  • don’t slouch. fix your posture.
  • don’t dress or groom like a slob.
  • don’t let yourself go physically.
  • banish verbal place holders like “umm”, “aah”, “ehh” and/or “uhh” from your conversations
  • don’t whine, moan or complain in the presence of women you don’t know well or are just beginning to date.
  • don’t let a woman’s poor conduct go without a response.
**That’s all very reasonable.

I suspect, that if we were to have an hour or two with some of our CAF no-hopers, it would be easy to discover some quick fixes.
**
 
For starters:

I have more confidence.
I don’t let rejection, subtle or overt, discourage me.
I got myself a decent wing man.
I’ve got more guts to keep trying.
I’m more likely to play than to be played.
I worry less about making ‘mistakes.’
I see a finer balance between when to flirt and when to be nice.

All of this simply because I ditched a guilt-ridden, cautious approach that worried too much about what other people (along with certain entities above and below) thought.

Much like sex, I’m afraid resources bearing the Catholic label just didn’t teach me as effectively. 🤷
What does any of that have to do with Catholicism?

Are you serious:
Catholicism kept you from having more confidence?
Catholicism made you be discouraged over rejection?
Catholicism kept you from enlisting assistance?
Catholicism took away your guts and kept you from trying?
Well I do hope your Catholicism kept you from playing/using others–I would hope common decency would also.
Catholicism made you worry about making mistakes?
Really? Catholicism made you guilt ridden, cautious and too concerned about what others thought? I can’t help be believe you do not understand Catholicism 1/8 as well as you think you do.

Why would you care what others think–if you know you are doing what’s right? I was always proud (and being proud could turn into an issue) about being a virgin and I was never bothered by any ribbing I got–which turned out to be very little–probably because it didn’t bother me and because I let them know I didn’t believe in premarital sex–confident in the decision and in attitude. I knew what I was doing was right and what they were doing was wrong–so why should I have been bothered and why should you? For all I know they may have been bothered by what I thought.

I just don’t see how Catholicism–which shows you a better way to live–is responsible for any of the ills you list. Especially since plenty of non religious people share these same problems–so perhaps you just want to blame Catholicism for some other reason?

The peace of Christ,
Mark
 
You know what’s stranger? Why these so-called ‘happily married people’ aren’t flying around helping the ‘unhappy single people?’

Oh but then again, it’s so much easier to condemn us single young’uns for consulting hyper-sexual sources. That’s the internet for ya! 👍
Any advice given is scoffed at or ignored or we’re told we just don’t understand (as if we never young). It’s not that it’s not being done but that the ‘unhappy single people’ aren’t listening or are telling us we are wrong. You know what they say, “You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make him drink”.

The peace of Christ,
Mark
 
Xantippe,
When I said it was possible to glean useful advice from the sites out there, you made a beeline straight for the trash pile and said “lookee here, see what I dragged out”. I see you’re still throwing out the baby with the bathwater there. There’s bathwater, no doubt, but there are babies in there somewhere, but you’d rather discredit the entire genre than admit it.

Maya Angelou didn’t say that with respect to dating. Not close at all. I have never seen that advice specifically addressed to men about women with examples in any setting but the men’s blogs you love to discredit…

I’ll give you credit for bringing up Athol Kay. But allow me to remind you that he got his start as a commenter on the men’s blogs and as a poster over at Talk About Marriage. Kay has done a tremendous amount of good though he does get criticized for being an atheist and for saying it’s okay as a last resort when all else fails to use divorce as the hammer to redirect a wayward spouse’s behavior. The first real conversations among men about how to keep a wife interested in maintaining the marriage bed occurred on a blog that CAF’ers absolutely hate with a passion. Kay’s MMSL blog came out of those conversations as well as numerous threads at TAM. Yes I agree there is a lot of bad material on that blog, on TAM and other sites, but do not let that blind you to the good stuff that did come from those conversations I’m referencing. That particular topic helped to save many marriages by helping men to wake up to how to act and what behaviors to avoid, how to engage their wives in ways that helped their wives want to stay in the marriage. Saving marriages (and thereby saving the children in those marriages) is a good thing from the Catholic point of view, is it not? If the advice is compatible with Christianity, is it bad advice simply because it was originally found on a disreputable source? That’s the position most CAF’ers adopt by default. Again, I credit you for bringing up Athol Kay, but I want to remind you where he came from…

I’ll summarize with is this: I’m firmly Catholic, I love my Catholicism and I’m glad I returned to it after my time in the wilderness. But … I think it’s a real shame that so much useful information for men about women, dating and marriage had to come from outside of the Church. That there is so much resistance to much of this information in Catholic and Christian circles. That to this day, the Church still isn’t that helpful to men who want to learn how to keep their wives engaged. Nor is the Church that useful for helping men deal with rebellious wives. Nor is the Church very helpful in translating what the Bible says about marriage to practical advice for men, let alone standing up well for it in the face of the feminist onslaught. There are some decent male Christian bloggers who are trying to fill that gap, take the good advice and put the Christian spin on it. But with many here on CAF and elsewhere, a lot of that is automatically discredited because the sources are considered anathema.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top