G
guanophore
Guest
It is a crass colloquialism. The use of such terms degrades discussion.How is it “gutter language” to say that you’re “pissed off” at someone? And how exactly is it hurting you?
It is a crass colloquialism. The use of such terms degrades discussion.How is it “gutter language” to say that you’re “pissed off” at someone? And how exactly is it hurting you?
I would think substituting prayer for such abuse would be a welcome improvement.Listen. There’s no comparision to the alleged (and historically unproven) allegation that jews stoned some christians 2,000 years ago (and any such violence would more accurately be described as happening within one religion, not two) to the centuries and millenia of abuse jews suffered at the hands of christian states.
Thank you for your contribution to the OP, Valke2. I certainly forgive you for being touchy, and beg that you will forgive the Catholics who have abused the Jews over the centuries. Such behavior does not glorify Christ (who was, as many forget, a Jew) and would be an affront to the Apostles, (who were also all Jews).Whatever. You wanted to know why some jews are offended by christians praying for them. I gave my opinion as to why. The Church for quite some time taught that we were christ killers and deserved to be treated accordingly while at the same time teaching that some of us had to be kept around for revelation. So you’ll have to forgive us for being touchy about more prayers for our conversion.
I have no animosity toward Catholics. My father is catholic. But I understand why Jews look askance at Catholics praying for their conversion.I would think substituting prayer for such abuse would be a welcome improvement.
Thank you for your contribution to the OP, Valke2. I certainly forgive you for being touchy, and beg that you will forgive the Catholics who have abused the Jews over the centuries. Such behavior does not glorify Christ (who was, as many forget, a Jew) and would be an affront to the Apostles, (who were also all Jews).
Hi Kristie… It wasn’t just a rogue Mormon group. It is what they do every single day in their temples. They do “baptisms for the dead” and they stand in proxy for them.But at the same time, I get upset when I read about things like the rogue Mormon group that were posthumusly baptizing people by proxy. It upset me, not because I thought anything would happen, but because I felt it showed a lack of respect for my beliefs.
Just my :twocents:
No, it is not nice at all, and in fact, we do take on the hurt of generations before us. The Jews have had more hurt as a people than just about any group, not only because they have been around longer, but because of their cohesion as a people. I agree that we are not toewear the hurt or take a victim stance, but to embody the trauma of the race to which we belong, or of a people can be a very healing thing.Seriously, we don’t get to take on the hurt of generations before us. You’re as old as you are, and anything that happened to you in that short time is yours to overcome, live with, or wear on your sleeve.
The stuff that happened to other people is theirs.
Wouldn’t it be nice, though, if we could take stuff from our ancestors. A doctor’s great-grandson gets all the cred that he worked for in school and in practice.
I would say it is a blessing, and a curse. For example, my ancestors come from Europe. I was at work this week and had a 15 year old very angry native American boy tell me that he does not trust “Whitey”. Now, I have not done anything personally to him, to lose his trust, but he comes to me after generations of abuse to his people by “Whitey”.That would be great, but it’s not reality. You don’t get to take stuff from people who happened to be related to you or who shared the same religion or race.
I think only a person who has never experienced discrimmination or racism could make such a statement. After recently celebrating MLK day, it is evident to me that slavery has victimized many generations, on both sides of it.Descendants of slaves are not victims of slavery.
Acknowledging trauma is not equivalent not playing “victim”. I should think this would be obvious from the accounts of Jewish Christians in the NT. Read the religious histories of Stephen and Paul before the councils. They acknowledged the wrongs done to their race without taking a “victim” attitude.I suppose it would be nice to claim victimhood based on heritage, if a victim is what you want to be.
Spoken like a true conquistador! The truth is that you have taken this from your ancestry.If I could take something from my ancestors, in the fantasy world that that would be possible in, I’d prefer to take a really cool profession, a knighthood, or maybe a kingship.
In every line of paupers there is a royal.Thing is, I’m pretty sure I come from a long line of paupers.
I agree, but one who is in poverty need not be victimized by it, right? Yet, if one were to acknowledge the damage done over the generations from poverty, one would not be amiss.That’s the ultimate victimhood, isn’t it? Poverty. Lower calls existance. Doesn’t get more victimy than that.![]()
Indeed. But, if such a one were to apologize, and give you back that lunch money, and more, then go on to prevent others from beating you up, and taking your lunch money, or also donating their lunch money in restitution, don’t you think that would be some solid steps to healing?If someone beats me up in the school yard for my lunch money ever day for a week and then says he’s not going to do it anymore, I’d be a fool to take him at his word.
This is the prayer during the Easter Triduum about the conversion of the perfidious Jews. They found it offensive. The language is very old, and was inserted in the liturgical Rite back when there was quite a bit of anti-semetic sentiment.I wish I could find the news article but I will try to relay what it said. It was about the Jews complaining to the Pope about a prayer the Catholic Church had, of which part of it asked for the conversion of the Jews. So the Pope, being the nice guy that he is, toned down the conversion part a little. Funny thing though, the Pope, being the nice guy that he is, didn’t bring up the prayer the Jews had for the conversion of Christians!
we have a prayer for the conversion of christians? That’s news to me.I wish I could find the news article but I will try to relay what it said. It was about the Jews complaining to the Pope about a prayer the Catholic Church had, of which part of it asked for the conversion of the Jews. So the Pope, being the nice guy that he is, toned down the conversion part a little. Funny thing though, the Pope, being the nice guy that he is, didn’t bring up the prayer the Jews had for the conversion of Christians!
I don’t understand where you are going with this? If you are alluding to the Church’s recent progress in repairing its relationship with Jews, I would agree. All the more reason to be wary of actions that look like a step backwards.Indeed. But, if such a one were to apologize, and give you back that lunch money, and more, then go on to prevent others from beating you up, and taking your lunch money, or also donating their lunch money in restitution, don’t you think that would be some solid steps to healing?
Or, even if someone did this for you that did not previously take your money, would it not be of benefit to healing?
No, I was talking about the OP, and another member saying that you were not “allowed” to be wounded by the transgressions toward your people from another generation. Healing can happen one person at a time, with people making reparation for the wrongs that were done before.I don’t understand where you are going with this? If you are alluding to the Church’s recent progress in repairing its relationship with Jews, I would agree. All the more reason to be wary of actions that look like a step backwards.
No, it is not nice at all, and in fact, we do take on the hurt of generations before us. The Jews have had more hurt as a people than just about any group, not only because they have been around longer, but because of their cohesion as a people. I agree that we are not toewear the hurt or take a victim stance, but to embody the trauma of the race to which we belong, or of a people can be a very healing thing.
For example, supposing the OP were to recognize that the Jews are hurt over the prayers on account of the past abuse that accompanied them. Such a person would be in a unique position to pray for healing, because they have deeper knowlege, and a heart inclined toward healing. The prayers of those who have been enlighted in this way are much more efficacious than those of an unknowing person who attends a Liturgy where a prayer is offered for the perfidious Jews, for example.
I would say it is a blessing, and a curse. For example, my ancestors come from Europe. I was at work this week and had a 15 year old very angry native American boy tell me that he does not trust “Whitey”. Now, I have not done anything personally to him, to lose his trust, but he comes to me after generations of abuse to his people by “Whitey”.
One of my ancestors “conquered” this region, imprisoned the Natives, and chopped off the feet of those who tried to escape the reservations. Here is a chance to take what has been given to me that shared the same religion and race, and in the name of my cherished religion committed great atrocities, and bring healing to the here and now.
If I ask his forgiveness for all the injuries done to him by European Catholics, pray for him, and show him the respect and dignity that he deserves as a human being, healing can happen.
Pretending it has nothing to do with me will be throwing away an opportunity.
I think only a person who has never experienced discrimmination or racism could make such a statement. After recently celebrating MLK day, it is evident to me that slavery has victimized many generations, on both sides of it.
Acknowledging trauma is not equivalent not playing “victim”. I should think this would be obvious from the accounts of Jewish Christians in the NT. Read the religious histories of Stephen and Paul before the councils. They acknowledged the wrongs done to their race without taking a “victim” attitude.
Paul also advises that people keep their state in life, if they are slaves, to serve with honor.
Spoken like a true conquistador! The truth is that you have taken this from your ancestry.
In every line of paupers there is a royal.The Royals were not known for their chastity.
I agree, but one who is in poverty need not be victimized by it, right? Yet, if one were to acknowledge the damage done over the generations from poverty, one would not be amiss.
As far as I know, we have no prayer praying for your conversion. As to prayers that are derogatory to non-jews, they are directed at idolators who persecute jews and even these prayers are often changed these days, as the article you linked to points out.I found several articles about the prayer but could not find the one I was referring to, anyway here is a link to one of the articles:
natcath.org/NCR_Online/archives2/2008a/032108/032108s.htm
Your replies to the prayer issue give me a drab view of Judaism. God it seems chose the Jews to be his people so that they follow a more stringent code than anyone else. That code must be followed to the letter or disaster! It seems as though God is torturing the Jews by playing a psych game with them. But if you’re a gentile. God doesn’t really care what you do as long as it isn’t totally base. So, It seems to me that a Jew would pray to be a gentile at least that way God is more merciful to you.As far as I know, we have no prayer praying for your conversion. As to prayers that are derogatory to non-jews, they are directed at idolators who persecute jews and even these prayers are often changed these days, as the article you linked to points out.
I once was called a Dogan Jew by an anti-Catholic and I STILL don’t know what that means.when was the last time someone in your family was abused for being catholic by a spaniard? The last time someone in my family was spit on for being jewish, as far as I know, was about 10 years ago. The last time someone in my family was murdered fro being Jewish was about 50 years ago.
And even if this were not so, I don’t buy your argument that just because I haven’t been persecuted I have no right to look at the people who have historically persecuted others like me because of their faith with mistrust.
Does she boss you around?I once was called a Dogan Jew by an anti-Catholic and I STILL don’t know what that means.
My people were persecuted by the English,pushed off our land and brutalized and starved.I have a cultural prejudice against things English because of my upbringing but I don’t mistrust the average Englishman because of ancestral persecution.I even married one(EnglishWOMAN i mean.)