Prayers to Mary

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fair_Lady
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh, hehe, ok. :o Sorry for misunderstanding you! Reading long apologetic threads makes me feel tired and annoyed. That’s why I usually avoid them … and obviously, I didn’t read this one very carefully, although I tried.
That’s perfectly all right. 🙂 I know what it’s like to read long threads. Sometimes I get dizzy and today it’s given me a huge headache.

Actually, I’d like to thank you for bringing this up because when I was looking at my post I found another confounding factor that should have been listed. So you helped me!! Thank you!!

God bless!!
 
I don’t really see anything wrong with the prayers, provided the person understands that in praying them Mary is not the final ‘goal’ so to speak, but God. In requesting her aid, we are asking for her intercession.
 
You are absolutely right! I don’t know why it was so hard to bring that point across, but I’m glad at least one person got it.

I need to do some more study on this point, but I see prayer as an act of worship because it is an act of connecting with a greater power in the heavenlies. I
The word “prayer” has narrowed in meaning. It now means to most Non-Catholics something one does only as an act of worship with God. So when anyone talks of “praying to” Mary, the non-Catholic automatically assumes that they are worshiping and talking to Mary in a way that is reserved for God alone.

However, all you have to do is to think of old time English and phrases like “I pray thee husband” A woman is not “praying” to her husband, she is asking him fervently. That is what Catholics do when we “pray” to Mary, ask her fervently for her prayer. In a similar manner that we would ask a fellow Christian her on earth to pray for us.
No matter how we slice it or dice it, devotion to Mary is an example of worshipping the creature rather than the Creator. She was a humble servant of God who would would magnify Him. Not ever would she approve of the devotion and honour that is being given to her through prayer and whatever other forms of veneration there are.
I sincerely implore anyone here who practises prayer to and veneration of Mary to examine your actions. What does God want from each of us? He wants us to love Him with all of our heart, soul and mind.
Actually, no. Did you realize in the definitions in the Catholic Church, it is clearly defined as to what kind of devotion we can give to Mary and the Saints? It is much clearer in Latin. But one CAN be devoted to ones husband, children without worshipping them as one worships God. It is as simple as that.
As stated elsewhere, I’m not against intercessory prayer, but I’m very much against praying to those who have died because I do not believe we should call up the dead even if they have made it to heaven. There are several severe warnings against the practise of contacting the dead in scripture, but I’ll list just a couple:
You believe those who are in heaven are dead? You truly can’t in anyway think this. Think critically about this, please!

They can’t be for they are alive in Christ, so the scripture you quote CANNOT apply to those who are alive in Christ in heaven. They Are NOT dead.

And when we “pray to” or ask Mary to pray for us, we aren’t looking for knowledge as those who call up spirits do. We are simply asking part of the body of Christ, to pray for another part of the body of Christ.
 
The word “prayer” has narrowed in meaning. It now means to most Non-Catholics something one does only as an act of worship with God. So when anyone talks of “praying to” Mary, the non-Catholic automatically assumes that they are worshiping and talking to Mary in a way that is reserved for God alone.

However, all you have to do is to think of old time English and phrases like “I pray thee husband” A woman is not “praying” to her husband, she is asking him fervently. That is what Catholics do when we “pray” to Mary, ask her fervently for her prayer. In a similar manner that we would ask a fellow Christian her on earth to pray for us.

Actually, no. Did you realize in the definitions in the Catholic Church, it is clearly defined as to what kind of devotion we can give to Mary and the Saints? It is much clearer in Latin. But one CAN be devoted to ones husband, children without worshipping them as one worships God. It is as simple as that.

You believe those who are in heaven are dead? You truly can’t in anyway think this. Think critically about this, please!

They can’t be for they are alive in Christ, so the scripture you quote CANNOT apply to those who are alive in Christ in heaven. They Are NOT dead.

And when we “pray to” or ask Mary to pray for us, we aren’t looking for knowledge as those who call up spirits do. We are simply asking part of the body of Christ, to pray for another part of the body of Christ.
Great post!! You’ve stated it very well!! 👍
 
The word “prayer” has narrowed in meaning. It now means to most Non-Catholics something one does only as an act of worship with God. So when anyone talks of “praying to” Mary, the non-Catholic automatically assumes that they are worshiping and talking to Mary in a way that is reserved for God alone.
There’s good reason for that. Take, for instance, what is being said to Mary. Here are some snippets of the prayers I posted in the opener:

“Obtain for them and for us the pardon of so many sins.”

“To thank thee for keeping me safe this day,
To ask thee this night to keep evil away. “

“Make me faithful to the flock
entrusted to me by the Good Shepherd.”

”I consecrate and entrust myself to you, Mary,”

“I hear all men call thee the refuge and hope of sinners:
be therefore my refuge and my hope.”

“I know that thou wilt help me,
if I commend myself to thee;
but I am fearful lest in the occasions of sin
I shall forget to call upon thee
and so I shall be lost.”

“Mother of Perpetual Help,
permit me not to lose my God.”

“grant me ever to be able to call upon thy powerful name,
since thy name is the help of the living
and the salvation of the dying.”

“In thy hands I place my eternal salvation;
to thee I entrust my soul.”

None of those things should be directed to anyone less than God. He alone is the One whom we should trust for our salvation. He is our refuge and help (see the Psalms).
However, all you have to do is to think of old time English and phrases like “I pray thee husband” A woman is not “praying” to her husband, she is asking him fervently. That is what Catholics do when we “pray” to Mary, ask her fervently for her prayer. In a similar manner that we would ask a fellow Christian her on earth to pray for us.
Another important issue. When used in a context as you indicate, we are speaking to someone who is still with us in body, mind and spirit. We have acces to them, whether we are with each other in person. We can use the telephone, email, snail mail, face book, etc. to communicate with them. However, when a person has passed on to glory, we don’t have those means to communicate with them. They are alive in spirit, but we do not communicate with spirits and we are forbidden to communicate with spirits.
“Give no regard to mediums and familiar spirits; do not seek after them, to be defiled by them: I am the Lord your God.” (Leviticus 19:31)

“And the person who turns after mediums and familiar spirits, to prostitute himself with them, I will set My face against that person and cut him off from his people.” (Leviticus 20:6)
Actually, no. Did you realize in the definitions in the Catholic Church, it is clearly defined as to what kind of devotion we can give to Mary and the Saints? It is much clearer in Latin. But one CAN be devoted to ones husband, children without worshipping them as one worships God. It is as simple as that.
Again, we talking about devotion to spirits. The fact that the Catholic Church allows or promotes any kind of devotion to any spirit outside of God is disturbingly wrong.
You believe those who are in heaven are dead? You truly can’t in anyway think this. Think critically about this, please!
They can’t be for they are alive in Christ, so the scripture you quote CANNOT apply to those who are alive in Christ in heaven. They Are NOT dead.
They are alive in spirit, and I stand by what I said earlier in this regard. We are not to comunicate with spirits.
And when we “pray to” or ask Mary to pray for us, we aren’t looking for knowledge as those who call up spirits do. We are simply asking part of the body of Christ, to pray for another part of the body of Christ.
As demonstrated with the snippets from prayers in the opeing post, much much more is being asked of Mary than to pray fo another part of the body of Christ. She is being asked for help, protection, obtaining pardons, praised for protection, told that her “powerful name” is the salvation of the dying, etc, etc. This is serious! God alone is the One of whom those things should be directed to.

Once again, I ask each one here to examine your hearts. What is it that drives you to Mary or other saints who have passed on before us? In heaven, God alone is absolutely sufficient to meet our needs for salvation and every other imaginable need we can possibly have.
 
I’m sorry I haven’t responded till now, I’ve been tied up with an all day marriage prep course saturday, followed by dinner with my Dad (visiting) and my fiance’s parents, then RCIA for my fiance (I’m a sponcer, not hers), followed by the super bowl. It’s been a busy weekend.
I’m sorry that I can’t answer all posts. I really do try my best to pick out the ones that appear to address the most common concerns being expressed. I do appreciate all the time that each and every one of you put into this thread and while each of you deserve a response, my clock just ticks a little to quickly to be able to respond to each post and I really do regret that.

No, Mary is not our intercessor. This is what the Bible says about Who it is in the heavenlies that intercedes for us:

Romans 8:34 - “Who is he that condemns? Christ Jesus, who died–more than that, who was raised to life–is at the right hand of God and is also interceding for us.”

Romans 8:27 - “and He who searches the hearts knows what the mind of the Spirit is, because He intercedes for the saints according to the will of God.”

Hebrews 7:25 - "Therefore He is able also to save forever those who draw near to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them. (NASB ©1995)

Please don’t discount what the Bible says about this matter. It is so vitally important for our spiritual health.
I appriciate what you’re trying to say fair lady, but I would ask you to go back and reread what you just posted. None of what you posted discounts the theology of the body, none of what you posted discounts the truth which you already admitted, intercesorary prayer is A-OK. This is what I meant earlier, you’ve been arguing against it this whole time, you just haven’t realized it. Now you’ve directly attacked intercesorary prayer.

So which is it? Did you sin when you prayed for Little Soldier? Or was that a right and proper thing for a Christian to do?
Yes, I do believe that the entire scripture is divinely inspired, but the comment I was referring to tells us not to be content with it. I found that quite offensive to God’s inspired word.
Great, I just like making sure we’re all on the same page. Not all non-catholics feel that way. When that’s the case, I usually need to stop the conversation until such time that we can both agree that the whole of the bible is divinely inspired.
May I ask a favor of you? Rather than using the quotation function for scripture, could you please copy and paste?
Sure no problem, I ususally like to use qutoes because I like to make it abundantly clear I’m directly quoting the bible (via copy + paste).
I’ll just say this about the first scripture you drew my attenition to - “Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle.” We can be sure that what these brethren were being told to hold fast to what had been preached to them, but we need to understand that what was preached to them was truth and had no conflict with what was scripture then and what became scripture later on. How do we know this? Because there are several sharp rebukes against following the tradition of men found in other places in scripture:
But I think what you’re missing, is that the scriptures weren’t written yet. Did you know 1 Thessalonians is the oldest Christian Writing we have? I’m curious what you think about that.
Mark 7:8
“You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to the traditions of men.”

Mark 7:9
"And he said to them: “You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe your own traditions!”

Matthew 15:6-7 (New International Version)
“…Thus you nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition. You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you:”
Your scripture fails to address my points, in fact it’s really not at all related to my points at all. My arguement is that you’re incorrect to believe the bible is the entirty of God’s word on earth. Let me provide you some more scripture to ponder:

drbo.org/chapter/53015.htm
1 Now I make known unto you, brethren, the gospel which I preached to you, which also you have received, and wherein you stand; 2 By which also you are saved, if you hold fast after what manner I preached unto you, unless you have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all, which I also received: how that Christ died for our sins, according to the scriptures: 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day, *according to the scriptures:

*i.e. in fulfillment of the OT, as I stated previously there was no written gospel. See:
catholicapologetics.info/apologetics/protestantism/wbible.htm

drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=61&ch=3&l=15&f=s#x
15 But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, *which is the church *of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.

The Church, not the Bible upholds and defends the truth of Christianity.
Yes.

As stated elsewhere, I’m not against intercessory prayer, but I’m very much against praying to those who have died because I do not believe we should call up the dead even if they have made it to heaven. There are several severe warnings against the practise of contacting the dead in scripture, but I’ll list just a couple:
But you are, in this very same post you contradict your self.
 
Again, we talking about devotion to spirits. The fact that the Catholic Church allows or promotes any kind of devotion to any spirit outside of God is disturbingly wrong.
Well, I couldn’t let this go by without comment.

Both my parents have died. If what Fair Lady said is true, I can no longer have “any kind of devotion” to them nor show them any kind of honor.

Strange that the Bible tells me to honor my father and my mother, yet doesn’t tell me that to do so after they have passed on is “disturbingly wrong.”
 
Once again, I ask each one here to examine your hearts. What is it that drives you to Mary or other saints who have passed on before us? In heaven, God alone is absolutely sufficient to meet our needs for salvation and every other imaginable need we can possibly have.
Dear Fair Lady,

Why is it that God must be separated from those who love Him? If you believe that those who believe in Christ and love Christ are one with Christ, why do you insist on separating them from God? Why must God stand alone and the saints stand somewhere else?

Do you perceive God to be completely separate from christians? If that is so, why does St. Paul say, it’s no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me? Why is the community of christians called the “Body of Christ”?

How can you separate christians, who make up the mystical Body of Christ, from Christ? When you insist on relating to “God alone,” you are separating God from His beloved children, His divine spouse, His own mystical Body. Do you perceive God to be so detached from His saints?

Catholics believe that the destiny of all those who love God is complete union with God, which means they truly become one with God, through Christ. It is in this sense that we Christians, either living or having passed away, can commune with each other within the mystical Body of Christ, within the big family of God. It is not push away God and commune with other spirits. it is to affirm the unity of God in His wonderful family and the blessed closeness of every member within this family. Christians are as close to each other as parts of a physical body are to each other. This closeness is not brought to an end because of physical death. Rather it is elevated and glorified and brought to eternal realization through death, because death is the door which leads to the ultimate heavenly reality.
 
The comment attached to that scripture reads: “16 “All scripture,”… Every part of divine scripture is certainly profitable for all these ends. But, if we would have the whole rule of Christian faith and practice, we must not be content with those Scriptures, which Timothy knew from his infancy, that is, with the Old Testament alone: nor yet with the New Testament, without taking along with it the traditions of the apostles, and the interpretation of the church, to which the apostles delivered both the book, and the true meaning of it.”

I’ve bolded what I see as a huge problem. Here we are being told not to be content with what God has provided to us - His word?! That is a license to come up with traditions, beliefs and practises suitable to mens’ imaginations and whatever suits their fancy. It’s no wonder that so many religious practices have their roots outside of scripture!
I find it troubling that you continue to maintain that everything God has stated is in the Bible. Where did you ever get this idea??

"Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written."

(John 21:25, New International Version)

According to you we’re supposed to ignore all these other things!! Does that make sense to you??

The Bible is a group of divinely inspired writings, penned by men. It may be sufficient for you and you may be content with it. Nobody is telling you that you have to pray to Mary or to the other saints.

But I really wonder about someone who refuses to accept all of God’s gifts. 🤷
 
Catholics believe that the destiny of all those who love God is complete union with God, which means they truly become one with God, through Christ. It is in this sense that we Christians, either living or having passed away, can commune with each other within the mystical Body of Christ, within the big family of God. It is not push away God and commune with other spirits. it is to affirm the unity of God in His wonderful family and the blessed closeness of every member within this family. Christians are as close to each other as parts of a physical body are to each other. This closeness is not brought to an end because of physical death. Rather it is elevated and glorified and brought to eternal realization through death, because death is the door which leads to the ultimate heavenly reality.
This may be the most beautiful and succinct explanation of the Communion of Saints that I’ve ever read. Thank you very much!
 
Well, I couldn’t let this go by without comment.

Both my parents have died. If what Fair Lady said is true, I can no longer have “any kind of devotion” to them nor show them any kind of honor.

Strange that the Bible tells me to honor my father and my mother, yet doesn’t tell me that to do so after they have passed on is “disturbingly wrong.”
Well of course it’s disturbingly wrong, Kay Cee. My Mom and Dad are gone, too, and I miss them desperately, especially my Mom. But according to Fair Lady, we’re not supposed to love them when they’re alive, either.

Where did you get this “honor my father and mother” idea? It doesn’t make any sense. MATTHEW 22:36-40 NKJ :

36 “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the law?”
37 Jesus said to him, " You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.' 38 "This is the first and great commandment. 39 "And the second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’

We can’t love our parents when they’re dead or when they are alive on earth. If we give all our love to the Lord our God there is just no room for anyone else. We can’t love our siblings or our spouses or our children. No room. Just no room.

Oh, I guess that means we can’t even love our neighbors as ourselves. Or love ourselves, for that matter.

:hmmm: Or could it just possibly be that Fair Lady’s interpretation (which, BTW we are expected to believe) is wrong??
 
I’m sorry I haven’t responded till now, I’ve been tied up with an all day marriage prep course saturday, followed by dinner with my Dad (visiting) and my fiance’s parents, then RCIA for my fiance (I’m a sponcer, not hers), followed by the super bowl. It’s been a busy weekend.
Congrats on your upcoming wedding! 🙂
I appriciate what you’re trying to say fair lady, but I would ask you to go back and reread what you just posted. None of what you posted discounts the theology of the body, none of what you posted discounts the truth which you already admitted, intercesorary prayer is A-OK. This is what I meant earlier, you’ve been arguing against it this whole time, you just haven’t realized it. Now you’ve directly attacked intercesorary prayer.
Do you see that the verses of scripture that I posted do not include Mary as our intercessor in the heavenlies? Who do they name as our intercessor in the heavenlies?
So which is it? Did you sin when you prayed for Little Soldier? Or was that a right and proper thing for a Christian to do?
We are told in scripture to pray for one another. But we are not told to pray to a person who has died for intercession. Jesus is our intercessor in heaven.
Sure no problem, I ususally like to use qutoes because I like to make it abundantly clear I’m directly quoting the bible (via copy + paste).
Thank you so much. It just makes it easier to directly respond to quotations.

But I think what you’re missing, is that the scriptures weren’t written yet. Did you know 1 Thessalonians is the oldest Christian Writing we have? I’m curious what you think about that.
Your scripture fails to address my points, in fact it’s really not at all related to my points at all. My arguement is that you’re incorrect to believe the bible is the entirty of God’s word on earth. Let me provide you some more scripture to ponder:
drbo.org/chapter/53015.htm
1 Now I make known unto you, brethren, the gospel which I preached to you, which also you have received, and wherein you stand; 2 By which also you are saved, if you hold fast after what manner I preached unto you, unless you have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all, which I also received: how that Christ died for our sins, according to the scriptures: 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day, *according to the scriptures:
*i.e. in fulfillment of the OT, as I stated previously there was no written gospel. See:
catholicapologetics.info/apologetics/protestantism/wbible.htm
There was no written gospel for a period of time. Then historical events (the birth, death and resurreciton of Jesus Christ) took place which fulfilled the prophecies of scripture. Now we have the gospel and my belief is that the Bible as a whole is God’s word and because of that, it is our final authority.
drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=61&ch=3&l=15&f=s#x
15 But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, *which is the church *of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.
We’ve covered this one before, but maybe a quotation from Matthew Henry’s commentary will help to expand on what I tried to say earlier:
“The church is the house of God; he dwells there. The church holds forth the Scripture and the doctrine of Christ, as a pillar holds forth a proclamation. When a church ceases to be the pillar and ground of truth, we may and ought to forsake her; for our regard to truth should be first and greatest.”
The Church, not the Bible upholds and defends the truth of Christianity.
Jesus said in Matthew 24:35 - “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.” The church is subject to error, but what God has said does not.
But you are, in this very same post you contradict your self.
This is what I said: “As stated elsewhere, I’m not against intercessory prayer, but I’m very much against praying to those who have died because I do not believe we should call up the dead even if they have made it to heaven. There are several severe warnings against the practise of contacting the dead in scripture, but I’ll list just a couple:”
Where is the contradiction?
 
I think we should do our best to try and maintian our Charity. I think what we need to remember is this, Fair Lady sincerly beleives that devotion to Mary is wrong. Clearly it’s been a part of her faith tradition for a long time, and people (rightly so) aren’t going to just change their theological views overnight. I’m sure she doesn’t mean to offend any posters here intentionally.

I for one would love to view Fair Lady’s response to the last series of scripture passages. I would also like to exhort her to take a step back, and look at the conversation with out the color of her preconceptions. Fair Lady, in that very last post of yours you really did contradict your self in the very same post.

Edit:
And there it is, thanks for responding Fair Lady. I don’t have time to write a detailed response right now, I’m just doing my early AM scan of the forums before I get cracking at the office. But I would ask you to consider this,

How can you pray an intercessorary prayer, with out in fact being an intercessor. When you do this, you are interceeding for the person whom you are praying for. Do you see the problem?
 
Congrats on your upcoming wedding! 🙂
Thanks so much, and as is typical I say I don’t have time to write a response but I just can’t stop my self from doing so.
Do you see that the verses of scripture that I posted do not include Mary as our intercessor in the heavenlies? Who do they name as our intercessor in the heavenlies?
We’re starting to touch on a number of different points of theology, but I’ve already brought this up. Do you beleive you are a member of the Body of Christ Fair Lady? Do you believe:

drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=52&ch=8&l=38&f=s#x
38 For I am sure that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor might, 39 Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Well if you believe you are in fact a member of the Body of Christ, and you do believe Paul when he writes that nothing can seperate you from the Body of Christ, then why don’t you believe Mary can pray for you? You’ve said repeatedly that you beleive in intercessorary prayer, what part of this equation don’t you believe? And again, as I previously stated, how can you believe in intercessorary prayer, but not believe that when you pray one you are in fact, your self an intercessor.

If no one (with out sinning) can attempt to be an intercessor between God and Man ever under any circomstance, then your belief in intercessorary prayer is inconsitant. In order to perform it, you must take an intercessorary role.
We are told in scripture to pray for one another. But we are not told to pray to a person who has died for intercession. Jesus is our intercessor in heaven.
I would like you to answer the above.
Thank you so much. It just makes it easier to directly respond to quotations.

But I think what you’re missing, is that the scriptures weren’t written yet. Did you know 1 Thessalonians is the oldest Christian Writing we have? I’m curious what you think about that.

There was no written gospel for a period of time. Then historical events (the birth, death and resurreciton of Jesus Christ) took place which fulfilled the prophecies of scripture. Now we have the gospel and my belief is that the Bible as a whole is God’s word and because of that, it is our final authority.
So you do accept the historical fact that indeed, when 1 Thess was written there was no written Gospel at all yes?
We’ve covered this one before, but maybe a quotation from Matthew Henry’s commentary will help to expand on what I tried to say earlier:
“The church is the house of God; he dwells there. The church holds forth the Scripture and the doctrine of Christ, as a pillar holds forth a proclamation. When a church ceases to be the pillar and ground of truth, we may and ought to forsake her; for our regard to truth should be first and greatest.”
I’m glad these quotes are right next to eachother, because they present a very big problem for your argument here. I want you to really ponder this one. Remember, the Gospel’s aren’t even written yet. At the point Paul is writing this, 90% of all Christian writings in existance are his own epistles!

To believe this explanation, that the “reason why the church is the pillar and foundation. Is because they have the bible, and the bible is the pillar and foundation” is to beleive that Paul was thinking his own epsitles were totally sufficient for the salvation of souls. Does that add up to you?

More over, did you catch that logical inconsitancy in the argument made by this person? “The church is the pillar and ground of the truth, because the bible is the pillar and ground of the truth”. That just doesn’t make any sense, Paul wouldn’t have written that. The purpose of the epistles aren’t to confuse people, he’s writing them to Christians who were already confused enough as it is!!! This explanation truely comes off as an individual trying to get their theology to some how, some way maybe fit the scriptures some how. Rather than someone who formed a theological opinion, based upon the scripture. Do you see the difference?

End Part 1
 
Begin part 2
Jesus said in Matthew 24:35 - “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.” The church is subject to error, but what God has said does not.
First
drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=47&ch=16&l=18&f=s#x
16 Simon Peter answered and said: Thou art Christ, the Son of the living God. 17 And Jesus answering, said to him: Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-Jona: because flesh and blood hath not revealed it to thee, but my Father who is in heaven. 18 And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. 19 And I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth, it shall be bound also in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose upon earth, it shall be loosed also in heaven. 20 Then he commanded his disciples, that they should tell no one that he was Jesus the Christ.

What I underlined is pretty powerful, Christ is promising that the gates of hell shall never prevail against the church. How can that be so, if the Church can teach error? Christ isn’t talking about the bible here mind you, he specifically says the Church. Here is Bishop Chanllor’s remarks for a further explination

18 “The gates of hell”… That is, the powers of darkness, and whatever Satan can do, either by himself, or his agents. For as the church is here likened to a house, or fortress, built on a rock; so the adverse powers are likened to a contrary house or fortress, the gates of which, that is, the whole strength, and all the efforts it can make, will never be able to prevail over the city or church of Christ. By this promise we are fully assured, that neither idolatry, heresy, nor any pernicious error whatsoever shall at any time prevail over the church of Christ.

I have another scripture for you, out of the Gospel of Luke:

drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=49&ch=10&l=16&f=s#x
16 He that heareth you, heareth me; and he that despiseth you, despiseth me; and he that despiseth me, despiseth him that sent me.

These are powerful words, Christ is telling his followers who ever listens to you is hearing my words. Whoever rejects you and your words, are literally rejecting me. How can this be if the Apostles were going to go about the country side teaching error? And by the way, this is only Chapter 10 of Luke, as we’ll see reading further even the 12 them selves still have A LOT TO LEARN. Yet when Christ sent them out, it was with the confidence that “He that heareth you, heareth me; and he that despiseth you, despiseth me; and he that despiseth me, despiseth him that sent me.”.

Lastly I have two more for you to read:

drbo.org/chapter/47028.htm
. 18 And Jesus coming, spoke to them, saying: All power is given to me in heaven and in earth. 19 Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. 20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world.

21 He said therefore to them again: Peace be to you. As the Father hath sent me, I also send you. 22 When he had said this, he breathed on them; and he said to them: Receive ye the Holy Ghost. 23 Whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them; and whose sins you shall retain, they are retained.

And how did the Father send the Son?
This is what I said: “As stated elsewhere, I’m not against intercessory prayer, but I’m very much against praying to those who have died because I do not believe we should call up the dead even if they have made it to heaven. There are several severe warnings against the practise of contacting the dead in scripture, but I’ll list just a couple:”
Where is the contradiction?
 
I think we should do our best to try and maintian our Charity. I think what we need to remember is this, Fair Lady sincerly beleives that devotion to Mary is wrong. Clearly it’s been a part of her faith tradition for a long time, and people (rightly so) aren’t going to just change their theological views overnight. I’m sure she doesn’t mean to offend any posters here intentionally.

I for one would love to view Fair Lady’s response to the last series of scripture passages. I would also like to exhort her to take a step back, and look at the conversation with out the color of her preconceptions. Fair Lady, in that very last post of yours you really did contradict your self in the very same post.

Edit:
And there it is, thanks for responding Fair Lady. I don’t have time to write a detailed response right now, I’m just doing my early AM scan of the forums before I get cracking at the office. But I would ask you to consider this,

How can you pray an intercessorary prayer, with out in fact being an intercessor. When you do this, you are interceeding for the person whom you are praying for. Do you see the problem?
So far, I haven’t seen too many unchaitible remarks. I still think the idea of a poll like this is disrespectful to our Lady, but I think that is more out of ignorance, not malice. FL has acted appropriately so far, we even had a little fun with the, now banned, troll this weekend.
At least she hasn’t claimed victory and ‘closed the thread’.😉
 
So far, I haven’t seen too many unchaitible remarks. I still think the idea of a poll like this is disrespectful to our Lady, but I think that is more out of ignorance, not malice. FL has acted appropriately so far, we even had a little fun with the, now banned, troll this weekend.
At least she hasn’t claimed victory and ‘closed the thread’.😉
The last few before my response were starting to teeter on it. It was starting to get a little personal, we should try not to let it get personal.
 
It pleased Darius to appoint 120 satraps to rule throughout the kingdom, with three administrators over them, one of whom was Daniel. The satraps were made accountable to them so that the king might not suffer loss. Now Daniel so distinguished himself among the administrators and the satraps by his exceptional qualities that the king planned to set him over the whole kingdom. At this, the administrators and the satraps tried to find grounds for charges against Daniel in his conduct of government affairs, but they were unable to do so. They could find no corruption in him, because he was trustworthy and neither corrupt nor negligent. Finally these men said, “We will never find any basis for charges against this man Daniel unless it has something to do with the law of his God.” So the administrators and the satraps went as a group to the king and said: “O King Darius, live forever! The royal administrators, prefects, satraps, advisers and governors have all agreed that the king should issue an edict and enforce the decree that anyone who prays to any god or man during the next thirty days, except to you, O king, shall be thrown into the lions’ den. Now, O king, issue the decree and put it in writing so that it cannot be altered—in accordance with the laws of the Medes and Persians, which cannot be repealed.” So King Darius put the decree in writing.
Now when Daniel learned that the decree had been published, he went home to his upstairs room where the windows opened toward Jerusalem. Three times a day he got down on his knees and prayed, giving thanks to his God, just as he had done before. Then these men went as a group and found Daniel praying and asking God for help. So they went to the king and spoke to him about his royal decree: “Did you not publish a decree that during the next thirty days anyone who prays to any god or man except to you, O king, would be thrown into the lions’ den?”
The king answered, “The decree stands—in accordance with the laws of the Medes and Persians, which cannot be repealed.”
Then they said to the king, “Daniel, who is one of the exiles from Judah, pays no attention to you, O king, or to the decree you put in writing. He still prays three times a day.” When the king heard this, he was greatly distressed; he was determined to rescue Daniel and made every effort until sundown to save him.
Then the men went as a group to the king and said to him, “Remember, O king, that according to the law of the Medes and Persians no decree or edict that the king issues can be changed.”
So the king gave the order, and they brought Daniel and threw him into the lions’ den. The king said to Daniel, “May your God, whom you serve continually, rescue you!”
A stone was brought and placed over the mouth of the den, and the king sealed it with his own signet ring and with the rings of his nobles, so that Daniel’s situation might not be changed. Then the king returned to his palace and spent the night without eating and without any entertainment being brought to him. And he could not sleep.
At the first light of dawn, the king got up and hurried to the lions’ den. When he came near the den, he called to Daniel in an anguished voice, “Daniel, servant of the living God, has your God, whom you serve continually, been able to rescue you from the lions?”
Daniel answered, “O king, live forever! My God sent his angel, and he shut the mouths of the lions. They have not hurt me, because I was found innocent in his sight. Nor have I ever done any wrong before you, O king.”
The king was overjoyed and gave orders to lift Daniel out of the den. And when Daniel was lifted from the den, no wound was found on him, because he had trusted in his God.
At the king’s command, the men who had falsely accused Daniel were brought in and thrown into the lions’ den, along with their wives and children. And before they reached the floor of the den, the lions overpowered them and crushed all their bones.

~Daniel 6:1-28
Why did Daniel think that it was wrong to pray to other than God?
 
Danial thought it was wrong to pray to false gods, Mary isn’t a false God. She is a member of the Body of Christ, a most honored member of the body of Christ. As a member of the body of Christ we can ask for her intercession, just as you might ask for my intercession if your mother was gravely ill (by asking me to pray for your mother).

The difference is God is a lot more likely to listen to the Theotokos, than he is to me I’m afraid. Not that I wouldn’t pray for your mother.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top