P
puer.dei
Guest
That is so sad.I see no reason to pray with them
That is so sad.I see no reason to pray with them
Yes, because it does not exist, having been abrogated.The law may not been mentioned in the new code,
I wish the Church WOULD come down harder on people like this.The Church has left a lot of issues more or less open;
If we were not to pray with non-Catholics, the Church would still be telling us so. You have every right to your own personal opinion, and certainly aren’t required to pray with anyone you don’t think worthy. But please don’t present your preference as Church teaching.Yes but the principle always remains true for all ages.
How charming of you.Unless you can’t read;
No; No Catholics can not pray with non Catholics.
Unitatis Redintegratio, 2,8In certain special circumstances, such as the prescribed prayers “for unity,” and during ecumenical gatherings, it is allowable, indeed desirable that Catholics should join in prayer with their separated brethren. Such prayers in common are certainly an effective means of obtaining the grace of unity, and they are a true expression of the ties which still bind Catholics to their separated brethren. “For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them”.
You seem to be accusing Pope Paul VI of false teaching.Yes, which goes against the entire Tradition of the Church
Wrong. And the Hay reference you post is not official Chuch teaching.No; No Catholics can not pray with non Catholics.
An “author” who “quotes Scripture…and…Tradition” doesn’t mean he’s communicating the official teaching of the Church. Martin Luther quoted Scripture all the time.I have cited several authors all who quote both scripture and the clear and constant Tradition of the Church.
You haven’t provided any good references and just about everything you’ve posted is contrary to Church teaching. You’re spreading misinformation and derailing a thread on which many others have given good, useful answers that also addressed the pre-Vatican II teachings about Catholic interaction with non-Catholics, or the concerns about common worship. You appear also to have an agenda, in that you insult and dismiss the official teaching of the Church.I gave far more references than Hay.
Worse than that, he completely dismisses the current canon law as modernist.In other words, you don’t have anything from canon law or the Catechism.
But nothing in the current catechism? How odd, if it’s so important.Baltimore Catechism – Confraternity Ed. (1941) Vol. II. Lesson 16.
“ How does a Catholic sin against faith? A Catholic sins against faith by apostasy, heresy, indifferentism, and by taking part in non-Catholic worship.”
“Catholics believe that their own Church is the only one founded by God Himself and that all others are false. Hence, it is illogical of Catholics to attend services held by ministers of false religions.” - This Is the Faith (1951) Chapter 8 (1). The First Commandment. - Fr. Canon Francis Ripley
From reading the Code of Canon Law.Hmm. I actually said nothing about the New Code. Just because something isn’t contained in there doesn’t mean it rejects it. Where did you learn logic?
Asking for citations is an insult? OK.You have insulted me several times.