T
Truthstalker
Guest
How can these coexist?
But who indeed are you, a human being, to talk back to God? Will what is made say to its maker,“Why have you created me so?”
Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for a noble purpose and another for an ignoble one?
What if God, wishing to show his wrath and make known his power, has endured with much patience the vessels of wrath made for destruction? (Romans 9:20-22, NAB)
How is this incompatible with free will?… faithfully we confess the predestination of the elect to life, and the predestination of the impious to death; in the election, moreover, of those who are to be saved,** the mercy of God precedes the merited good.** In the condemnation, however, of those who are to be lost, the evil which they have deserved precedes the just judgment of God. In predestination, however, (we believe) that God has determined only those things which He Himself either in His gratuitous mercy or in His just judgment would do… in regard to evil men, however, we believe that God foreknew their malice, because it is from them,** but that He did not predestine it**, because it is not from Him. (We believe) that God, who sees all things, foreknew and predestined that their evil deserved the punishment which followed, because He is just, in whom as Saint Augustine says, there is concerning all things everywhere so fixed a decree as a certain predestination. " (Denzinger 322)
**A definition is in order . . .How can these coexist?
**First, the citation is not without errors . . . **As for the traditional understanding of predestination, it is taught by the Catholic Church by the Council of Valence III, AD 855:
How is this incompatible with free will?
**The vessels of wrath (impious) are not predestinated (pre-bound for the light).and the predestination of the impious to death; . . . (We believe) that God, who sees all things, foreknew and predestined that their evil deserved the punishment which followed, because He is just,
**IMHO, what this statement should say is: “In predestination, however, (we believe) that God has determined only those who He Himself either in His gratuitous mercy or in His just judgment had chosen.”In predestination, however, (we believe) that God has determined only those things which He Himself either in His gratuitous mercy or in His just judgment would do.
* Chosen--Greek: eklegomai - to select, make choice, from
The Catholic Church teaches both are true, though it is impossible for man (who is limited) to understand how. The tendency of many has been to take one over the other but that always leads to theological problems.How can these coexist?
well, yeah, God must give undeserved actual graces to a sinner to move him to authentic repentance and faith. But He ain’t gonna force the grace on him. A person can freely say NO to the grace of God. They cannot fully say YES on their own power, no God must HELP them ACCEPT His help, but they can say no. I don’t know if you were implying that there is irresistabe grace? Catholicism condemns that. Even efficaceous grace can be resisted.Q: Who will choose God?
A: No one.
Tabcom,**First, the citation is not without errors . . .
**
**Any discussion about predestination must begin with what the word means, in its original greek text (see post #7). Catholic doctrine is derived from it.Predestination is predetermination. I have predetermined that if my child deliberately disobey’s me, I will punish him.
**Predestination and foreknowledge are two different concepts. In the former, God makes things happen. In the latter, He know what will happen.
* pro – meaning "before", and
* ginosko – meaning to know intimately or exactly
God’s indictment of man is that none is good, and none seeks God (Rom 3:10ff); how then do you reckon that God could foresee anyone choosing Him?If God in His mercy before the world is created says to Himself “I will given Heaven to the people that will choose me and since I have perfect foreknowledge of which ones that will” I will choose to call the The Elect–how does that in any way predetermine what they will choose of absolve them of responsibility for their choices?
Jesus says that no one has the ability to choose Him, but must be drawn, helkūō, literally, “dragged,” by the Father to Him; how then do you reckon that anyone not “dragged” by the Father would be able to do anything other than “choose against Him?”Similiarily when the ones that do not choose God are given Hell it is not because he predetermined their fate when He foreknew who the elect were but because even though He did foreknew it–they had the complete power to choose–they choose against Him–God knowing that that is what they will do does not mean that they are absolved of responsibility for the free will that they exercise!
That is a strawman; when one is dragged, and regenerated by God, he then will freely choose; he does so, because it is God’s will that he do so.The difference between the Catholic view of predestination and the Calvinist view of predestination is that Catholics maintain that no matter what God does He never impinges on the free will of man.
Another strawman; it is OK for God to violate or impinge upon man’s free-will, because God does what He pleases (Ps 115:3). Read the case of Abimelech in Gen 20; God certainly impinged upon Abimelech’s will; Read of the case of the rulers of the earth in Ps 75:6-8; Read of the case of the host of heaven, and the inhabitants of the earth in Dan 4:35; and what of Paul’s will to remain a Jew, and continue persecuting the Church in Acts 9?Calvinists believe that since God is sovereign that it is OK for Him to violate or Impinge of man’s freedom of will.
Your reasoning is flawed; go out in the garage, start your car, put it in neutral, and what does it do? Where does it go?The choice is not to Choose God or Not Choose God it is Neutrality of Man’s will versus Resistance to God.
When seen in this light instead of either/or–Man’s freedom of will is not violated because if it is Neutral then God is not impinging on it And man is saved only through God’s grace as Man doesn’t do anything to save himself since his will is in neutral!
In Rom 9:22, the vessels of wrath prepared for destruction are in the accusative, and the verb is a passive; IOW, they are the passive, direct object of the preparation for destruction.Man is stilll able to exercise his free will and resist God and for that gets to go to Hell–not because God predetermines what the man will do–only because God predestines the punishment for people that will make that free choice. Doing that is not predetermining what the person will do!
Romans 8:29The scriptures don’t state whether God foreknows and then predestines or predestines then foreknows. God as pure act is capable of doing both simultaneously.
Another strawman.The Calvinist God is a predeterming monster!