Priest 'smashes chair' over Italian restaurant owner's head as nuns kick him in the stomach

  • Thread starter Thread starter JPUSC
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
LOL! Sounds like the guy is making it up- I love the bit where the article states the nuns have a combined age of 160 and you just get this image of them beating this guy up! 😃
 
If this is true, it is ridiculous behavior on the part of the priest and nuns. However, I have my doubts as to whether or not it is true.
 
This is hilarious :rotfl:

Clearly we ought to set these sisters on Obama and his supporters! :newidea: :slapfight:

[edit: in case anyone was in any doubt, that’s a joke, I don’t advocate violence in the political process.]
 
DL82 said:
This is hilarious :rotfl:

Clearly we ought to set these sisters on Obama and his supporters! :newidea: :slapfight:

[edit: in case anyone was in any doubt, that’s a joke, I don’t advocate violence in the political process.]
Click to expand...
Not funny to this Obama supporter! :rolleyes:
 
SheilaDavis said:
Not funny to this Obama supporter! :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Sheila, are you, by any chance, Catholic? If so, HOW can you vote for a pro-abortion candidate like Obama?! Didn’t you hear the bishops say that Catholics could not, in good conscience, vote for a pro-abortion candidate?😦
 
Sheila, are you, by any chance, Catholic? If so, HOW can you vote for a pro-abortion candidate like Obama?!
Click to expand...
I find that usually, politics is picking the best from a bad bunch. For instance, I live in Australia, and we have free universal healthcare here. I find it evil that McCain continues to support healthcare only for those who can afford it; many people die and suffer as a result. A reasonable argument could be made that this is killing, just as much as abortion.
 
mouse_has_faith said:
I find that usually, politics is picking the best from a bad bunch. For instance, I live in Australia, and we have free universal healthcare here. I find it evil that McCain continues to support healthcare only for those who can afford it; many people die and suffer as a result. A reasonable argument could be made that this is killing, just as much as abortion.
Click to expand...
You are right. The argument CAN BE MADE. But it is an invalid argument from the perspective of pure logic, not religion, just logic.

Logic (mathermatical and philosophical) says that you cannot compare two things that are different.

The right to live is real. The right to be born is also real. They are different rights. Therefore, they cannot be defended in the same syllogism. Check out Aristotle.

Fraternally,

JR 🙂
 
mouse_has_faith said:
I find that usually, politics is picking the best from a bad bunch. For instance, I live in Australia, and we have free universal healthcare here. I find it evil that McCain continues to support healthcare only for those who can afford it; many people die and suffer as a result. A reasonable argument could be made that this is killing, just as much as abortion.
Click to expand...
Do you realize how many people die because of socialized medicine? If you’re too old, sick, or disabled the government just decides you aren’t worth it. That’s what happens when you ration health care.
 
MakeUpArtist said:
Do you realize how many people die because of socialized medicine? If you’re too old, sick, or disabled the government just decides you aren’t worth it. That’s what happens when you ration health care.
Click to expand...
No, that’s what happens when there is no value placed on God’s creation. God is the creator of life, and only he can decide when that life here is done.
Obama has told us he is not qualifyed to know when God’s creation begins. He has also told us he is christian.
He has not told us, what makes a person out of the womb no longer God’s creation?
Slippery slope.
 
notsmart said:
No, that’s what happens when there is no value placed on God’s creation. God is the creator of life, and only he can decide when that life here is done.
Click to expand...
What world are you living in? People decide to end life all the time. Have you never heard of abortion and euthanasia?
 
MakeUpArtist said:
What world are you living in? People decide to end life all the time. Have you never heard of abortion and euthanasia?
Click to expand...
People do things abbhorrent to God all the time! That does not mean God endorses it, and that does not mean those calling themselves his children ought to be.
You asked me what world I am living in? I am living in the society promoting (or president elect who does, whith lots of followers) culture of death.
 
notsmart said:
People do things abbhorrent to God all the time! That does not mean God endorses it, and that does not mean those calling themselves his children ought to be.
You asked me what world I am living in? I am living in the society promoting (or president elect who does, whith lots of followers) culture of death.
Click to expand...
Wow. You’re going way off track. I never said God endorsed those things. I was talking about the dangers of socialized medicine. You’re way off topic.
 
MakeUpArtist said:
Wow. You’re going way off track. I never said God endorsed those things. I was talking about the dangers of socialized medicine. You’re way off topic.
Click to expand...
But, the dangers you cited were the same dangers all human lives face. And, socialized medicine is not the only cause for them to be. Government has opened the door to determine what life has value and what does not, just as you cited in cases where socialized medicine can have its downfall. So on what moral basis can you say we should only be concerned with lives that are at risk over socialized medicine, and not be concerned about all life?
 
JReducation said:
You are right. The argument CAN BE MADE. But it is an invalid argument from the perspective of pure logic, not religion, just logic.

Logic (mathermatical and philosophical) says that you cannot compare two things that are different.

The right to live is real. The right to be born is also real. They are different rights. Therefore, they cannot be defended in the same syllogism. Check out Aristotle.

Fraternally,

JR 🙂
Click to expand...
I will put it simply then. McCain does not support healthcare for everyone. As a result, many suffer. So McCain has a policy where people will suffer as a result.
It still stands, though you may believe otherwise, that politics generally is “picking the best of a bad bunch”.
 
notsmart said:
But, the dangers you cited were the same dangers all human lives face. And, socialized medicine is not the only cause for them to be. Government has opened the door to determine what life has value and what does not, just as you cited in cases where socialized medicine can have its downfall. So on what moral basis can you say we should only be concerned with lives that are at risk over socialized medicine, and not be concerned about all life?
Click to expand...
Those who might die while on a waiting list are extremely vulnerable. That’s why I brought it up when someone mentioned government run healthcare. Why would I bring up every other life issue while talking about this? Your posts here really don’t make sense or pertain to what I was saying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top