F
FreciaMarie
Guest
Uh huh.That would be why I read it day and night. I, in fact, do know my faith.
That is abundantly clear.
…
Uh huh.That would be why I read it day and night. I, in fact, do know my faith.
Don’t preach to me. You are not really a Catholic as your postings are the proof in the pudding. You are what is called by the Liberals a “Useful idiot.”If that is true, then Rick Santorum and Bobby Jindal should be excommunicated, as they support the death penalty and many other things that the RCC is strictly against. Do not just go after the “liberals.”
I disagree with none of the RCC’s teachings, I just disagree on how harsh they are to the democratic belief system.
This statement say’s otherwise.I do not see how opposing same-sex marriage is not discrimination, which is evil in itself.
Do you not see how that would hurt my feelings? You’ve just judged me and insulted me. I am, in fact, a Catholic. No human will tell me otherwise.Don’t preach to me. You are not really a Catholic as your postings are the proof in the pudding. You are what is called by the Liberals a “Useful idiot.”
You technically would be a hypocrite. But aren’t we all?This statement say’s otherwise.
Let me ask you something, what would you think of me as a Catholic, telling you that as a Catholic I believe that theft is immoral and than turning around and encouraging my neighbour to steal?
God Bless
Thank you for reading
Josh
I am judging your information, which is sorely absent on this issue. The Bishops and the Vatican have judged the issue, and they have a right to judge the issue as those to whom you and I both owe obedience. They are the moral authority to whom we owe primary allegiance, not the U.S. electorate or the American Gay Lobby, or the MSNBC propaganda machine which mistakenly calls it a “right,” or the Democratic Left.I do not see how opposing same-sex marriage is not discrimination, which is evil in itself. Please do not judge my knowledge of my Catholic faith when you have no reason to do so.
Let me just say… I don’t believe in “rights.” We all have unlimited rights or no rights at all. And yes, I did know what you just presented me.I am judging your information, which is sorely absent on this issue. The Bishops and the Vatican have judged the issue, and they have a right to judge the issue as those to whom you and I both owe obedience. They are the moral authority to whom we owe primary allegiance, not the U.S. electorate or the American Gay Lobby, or the MSNBC propaganda machine which mistakenly calls it a “right,” or the Democratic Left.
The Church hierarchy has been abundantly clear about why opposing homosexual “marriage” is not an abridgement of “rights,” because there is zero inherent right to such a faux and intrinsically evil arrangement. Again, had you read the documents you are required to read by virtue of your Confirmation, you would have already known that.
Regardless, the subject of this thread is not homosexual pretend-“marriage,” falsely seized as a “right,” but rather Nancy Pelosi and her stand on abortion. It seems that you brought up a different issue, which is why I addressed that.
If you are, indeed, reading the catechism of the Catholic Church “every day”, as you claim, and still manage to type the above, I question your reading comprehension skills.This is quite unbelievable, what these priests are doing. Such men have no right nor reason whatsoever to demand of anyone that they renounce the Catholic faith, and may God have mercy on their souls. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, and I think these “priests” are making a “mortal” mistake. It is time for someone, man or woman, to inform the clergymen of the Catholic Church that they do not decide everything nor do they know everything.
When a Catholic clergyman is threatened with pregnancy and actually raises a child of his own, I’ll be happy to accept their stance on abortion. While I am pro-life, I’m not pro-life because the Roman Catholic Church told me to be, but because God did.
Well, you are incorrect in thinking that the Church is categorically against the death penalty. See CCC §2267. Perhaps there are other tidbits that you might be surprised to learn?That would be why I read it day and night. I, in fact, do know my faith.
You are entitled to your opinions, as are we all. I don’t wish to argue anymore, for clearly we are not getting anywhere and we do not understand each other. God bless you!If you are, indeed, reading the catechism of the Catholic Church “every day”, as you claim, and still manage to type the above, I question your reading comprehension skills.
I’m weary of Catholics who do nothing but rant against the leaders and shepherds of our faith. Truly.
I.am.sick.of.it.
The most charitable thing I can say is to advise you to pray for discernment, while you read the catechism “daily”, as you claim to do.
Can you see the comparisons in what you have written?You technically would be a hypocrite.
No. As a Catholic I believe that the sexual acts of homosexuality are immoral and that marriage is only between a man and a woman. So why would I advocate same sex marriage for others? it would be nonsensical or completely heartless.But aren’t we all?
Catechism of the Catholic Church
If you see the sexual acts of homosexuality as immoral, than why would you try and advocate and embrace that form of sexuality for others? it would seem a bit heartless of you.CCC 2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms through the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained. Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity,141 tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered."142 They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.
Likewise. God’s blessings on you, as well.You are entitled to your opinions, as are we all. I don’t wish to argue anymore, for clearly we are not getting anywhere and we do not understand each other. God bless you!
Your Church does believe in rights vs. (faux) “rights.” And since you claim that you “did know” it, then you have chosen to oppose your Church, the authority of Christ on earth, on this issue. The Church bases her teaching on true and permanent rights as being linked with divine law, nothing less and nothing more.Let me just say… I don’t believe in “rights.” We all have unlimited rights or no rights at all. And yes, I did know what you just presented me.
This is non-sensical.Let me just say… I don’t believe in “rights.” We all have unlimited rights or no rights at all.