is that so…I’m not for abortion. You guys are off the mark. We don’t vote for Clinton, Carter, Kerry because they support abortion…they are for the rights of women to choose; Ratzinger has said we can vote our social conscience. All your name calling won’t stop that. You think you’ve found an issue you can stick with…but you are using it in order to not have to think further, not consider other implications… there really is a difference. Kerry did his legislative duty representing citizens in a multi-cultural nation like ours. What has BUSH done for you? He
has been president 4 years, and has
had a republican congress…the same congress that voted for Iraq, voted for tax breaks for the rich, passed the huge medicare bill.
I know.!!!..he’s waiting for the bill ending abortion to be placed on his desk…the same way he waited for the bill he would have signed
if his republican congress had presented it…the one that would have
extended the ban on assault weapons…YOUR trained monkey of a president is for death. He has killed thousands of people with this illegal war on Iraq… not Clinton, not Kerry. But you don’t care about non-Americans dying…or your would be up in arms abut the Sudan. (to get America’s attention, you must have OIL, OIL, OIL.)
Oh…by the way…while Kerry only votes in congress to keep in place the legislation that permits abortion (which both Bushes have not tried to dislodge) … our BISHOPS (like your president) are doing a little verbal engineering in order to **permit **abortion…they call abortion “
proportionate induction”. It seems that
CATHOLIC hospitals are following the CATHOLIC US Bishops *ETHICAL *and Religious directives for catholic health care services…
inducing labor during the 23 and 26th week…aborting babies the old- fashioned way, by
INDUCING a
miscarriage. Real pretty…Now, who are the Nazis?
Checkmate…
http:
www.ewtn.com/vnews/getstory.asp?number=49550
your link to the story. I know you wouldn’t believe anything a democrat says.