Q
QwertyGirl
Guest
Very doubtful.
Where do you disagree with the mainstream accepted science above?goout:
You almost caught me. I don’t debate my personal feelings about abortion here in this form. I do try to give (name removed by moderator)ut sometimes when I see someone making an argument that I know will not fly with the pro-choice crowd.Stop me when you disagree:
At the moment of conception we have unique DNA.
An individual with unique DNA.
The DNA is human.
The unique human has the potential to live and die like everyone else.
Is this settled science for you or does some religious belief of yours trump this?
I don’t debate abortion here. Nobody reading here or posting here is going to have their mind changed as a result of a debate here. I I’m comfortable in my position, and have no need or desire to convince people to change their minds.Where do you disagree with the mainstream accepted science above?
It’s a simple question that is reasonable to ask and consider
I am not debating abortion. I’m asking you where you disagree here:goout:
I don’t debate abortion here. Nobody reading here or posting here is going to have their mind changed as a result of a debate here. I I’m comfortable in my position, and have no need or desire to convince people to change their minds.Where do you disagree with the mainstream accepted science above?
It’s a simple question that is reasonable to ask and consider
Pro-choice people don’t typically believe the fetus is a person. To them, it is apples and oranges. The same argument that applies to you and me doesn’t apply to a fetus.Another way of looking at it is those who are pro life would like the baby to be able to choose life, rather than have that choice denied him or her. It relates to the suggestion that one out of every two patients leave an abortion clinic alive.
In cases where you will be killed without your consent, what choice is there for you?
Do they not believe, or are they simply in denial of the truth that they are a person to justify their wrong doing?Pro-choice people don’t typically believe the fetus is a person. To them, it is apples and oranges. The same argument that applies to you and me doesn’t apply to a fetus.
Yes, and pro aborts are trying to force an irrational belief on others while clearly denying the settled science. The irony is striking, because “forcing your beliefs on others” is the typical reflex accusation of pro aborts toward pro lifers.jeannetherese:
Pro-choice people don’t typically believe the fetus is a person. To them, it is apples and oranges. The same argument that applies to you and me doesn’t apply to a fetus.Another way of looking at it is those who are pro life would like the baby to be able to choose life, rather than have that choice denied him or her. It relates to the suggestion that one out of every two patients leave an abortion clinic alive.
In cases where you will be killed without your consent, what choice is there for you?
I think you are missing the point.Is this settled science for you or does some religious belief of yours trump this?
“” I am for the killing of the poor and handicapped. They are inconvenient and they take resources that I need for my career and and my own family.goout:
I think you are missing the point.Is this settled science for you or does some religious belief of yours trump this?
As a Catholic, I would never recommend or support someone having an abortion.
As an American, we cannot force our views on others. A fetus, legally, is simply not an American citizen at the moment of conception. Perhaps we can say at 18-25 weeks or so it is. Abortion is morally wrong, but so is forcing a religious position on others.
Realism is a good thing.goout:
As a realist,Is this settled science for you or does some religious belief of yours trump this?
Who’s against health insurance? Conservatives just don’t want government control of all health insurance and health decisions based on what the government decides what they’ll pay for.How can you be against health insurance and be “pro-life”?
We believe in social programs for the truly needy. What we don’t want are programs that provide so much that people don’t want to get off them. Provide incentives to work, not incentives to stay on the government dole.How can you be against social programs and be “pro-life”?
Can you provide examples of these cuts? The number of people on food stamps is down because more people have jobs. Please show examples of cuts in adoption and foster care programs. Most of these are administered by the state and county governments.How can you be pro-life and cut adoption, food stamp, and foster programs?
Do you have statistical references to show this is the number one cause? Please share. Some might look at a causative factor being the lack of education, lower morality, generational welfare families and rampant drug abuse. It’s a very complex issue. Enabling it by legalizing abortion sure didn’t help.We don’t live in a perfect world, and unfortunately the number ONE cause of poverty is having children you cannot support. I am not advocating abortion for the poor, I am saying you cannot claim to be pro-life without also supporting the corresponding required massive social program expense.
Calling yourself “pro-options” and claiming you don’t support abortion, yet want it to be legal, is denying that a fetus is a human life and enabling those who want to commit murder of unborn children.For this reason, I am what I call “pro-options”. I do not support abortion, but it should be legal with restrictions and we need to do everything in our power to make it unnecessary.