'Pro-Choice Catholic Politicians' to Be Sued for Heresy

  • Thread starter Thread starter St.Claire
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Lance:
Even if you don’t believe what the Church teaches?
Lance that is a good point:thumbsup: Protestants are to refrain from taking the Eucharist because they don’t believe what the Catholic Church teaches about the Eucharist yes,but also they must believe the rest of Her teachings and get permission from the Bishop.God Bless
 
**The Denunciations for Heresy and other offenses against Canon Law have been filed against Senators Edward Kennedy, John Kerry, Thomas Harkin, Susan Collins, and Mr. Mario Cuomo. **

Join the Class-Action Lawsuit

http://www.defide.com/join.html

DE FIDE is a non-profit association founded specifically to use every available means of Canon Law to defend the Faith and Church from Heresy and other grievous crimes. To accomplish its mission, DE FIDE initiates lawsuits in Ecclesiastical Court to protect the rights of the faithful and unbaptized. The Association consists of a consortium of premier Canon Law experts around the world who work in tandem to achieve this goal.
 
40.png
rwoehmke:
Maybe cause the Church is not a country club or any kind of organization set up by man. The mark of Baptism is ineradicable.Become a bad Catholic yes, but still a Catholic never-the-less.
You can’t be a “bad” Catholic. Either you except each and everything the Church teaches. Or you don’t. It’s binary, baby, binary.
 
Trelow,

Actually I disagree…one can accept all the teachings of the Church/faith, and yet still fall in some areas…that would make them a bad Catholic. Example: One can accept that adultery is a moral sin as taught by the Church, yet still fall into an affair and have to seek foregiveness.

If a person rejects “any” teachings of the Catholic Church/faith, then they simply are not Catholic.
 
40.png
TPJCatholic:
Trelow,

Actually I disagree…one can accept all the teachings of the Church/faith, and yet still fall in some areas…that would make them a bad Catholic. Example: One can accept that adultery is a moral sin as taught by the Church, yet still fall into an affair and have to seek foregiveness.

If a person rejects “any” teachings of the Catholic Church/faith, then they simply are not Catholic.
I don’t think it would make them a bad Catholic. Just a sinner like every other Catholic. But it would separate them from Grace, making it much, much more likely they would start to reject a teaching of the Church.
 
Trelow,

If they did not go to confession to seek foregiveness, and yet continued to receive the Lord during Communion–that is what would make them a bad Catholic. As you say, we are all sinners, yet in the context of the faith we are supposed to repent and seek foregiveness when we sin…and we not to partake of Jesus’ Body and Blood in an unworthy manner.
 
St.Claire said:
**
The Denunciations for Heresy and other offenses against Canon Law have been filed against Senators Edward Kennedy, John Kerry, Thomas Harkin, Susan Collins, and Mr. Mario Cuomo. **

Join the Class-Action Lawsuit

http://www.defide.com/join.html

DE FIDE is a non-profit association founded specifically to use every available means of Canon Law to defend the Faith and Church from Heresy and other grievous crimes. To accomplish its mission, DE FIDE initiates lawsuits in Ecclesiastical Court to protect the rights of the faithful and unbaptized. The Association consists of a consortium of premier Canon Law experts around the world who work in tandem to achieve this goal.

Gee, maybe Bush is right. Maybe we do need tort reform to save us from wacko lawsuits.
 
40.png
katherine2:
Gee, maybe Bush is right. Maybe we do need tort reform to save us from wacko lawsuits.
Yeah! How dare they be held responsible for supporting the destruction of the unborn,how dare they be held responsible for scandalising Church teaching.How dare they be held responsible for upholding laws that rip innocent humans up in the womb,and encouraging others to think it is okay since they are “Catholic”.How dare any one stop them from taking the Eucharist after voting to keep the slaughter of the unborn legal:rolleyes: Any way:whistle:
 
40.png
Lisa4Catholics:
Yeah! How dare they be held responsible for supporting the destruction of the unborn,how dare they be held responsible for scandalising Church teaching.How dare they be held responsible for upholding laws that rip innocent humans up in the womb,and encouraging others to think it is okay since they are “Catholic”.How dare any one stop them from taking the Eucharist after voting to keep the slaughter of the unborn legal:rolleyes: Any way:whistle:
When you disagree with Katherine2 be ready for her to attack you personally.
 
40.png
Lance:
When you disagree with Katherine2 be ready for her to attack you personally.
Thankyou for your kind warning:) She got me on a couple of threads already:D 😉 She wanted to show off her charitable side:whistle:
 
40.png
Trelow:
You can’t be a “bad” Catholic. Either you except each and everything the Church teaches. Or you don’t. It’s binary, baby, binary.
My understanding has always been that a person baptized Catholic remained Catholic even if some of the teachings were not accepted. The only way out as an adult was to publically reject the Catholic Faith in toto, which none of these people have done. If they are really not Catholics any longer why would there be any point in hailing them into a Catholic court? No longer Catholic equals no jurisdiction. One could hardly excommunicate a Jew or a Protestant. If one wants to convert to the Catholic Faith, then rejection of teachings do make that person in eligible for reception into the Faith. They were not Catholic to start with. It is not binary baby.
 
This is really crazy. How in the world can these politicians be called “heretics?” They’re not trying to promote some alternate theology; they’re just serving the constituents who elected them.

Why should we focus only on pro-choice politicians? Why doesn’t this group go after every other “Catholic” politician who has done something not in line with Church dogma - maybe someone who got divorced, or has used artificial contraception, or has skipped Mass, or who voted for an unjust war, etc.

I think the motives must be political. Why aren’t they going after moderate Republicans like Guiliani and Schwarzenegger who are Catholic and pro-choice?
 
40.png
jlw:
Isn’t Joe Biden Catholic?? Arnold and Rudy should get their act together too…
I am dissappointed in AHHHnold and Rudy for sure. These guys are too intelligent to be pro-choice- They should just know better. Yes Joe Biden is Catholic. My contempt for Joe Biden goes beyond his politics. He plays himself as a “centrist” but he is really just a media hungry blowhard. His behavior the Gonzales hearling was deplorable. He should stick to being more like the late Senator WiIliam Roth and work to improve tax code instead of media grandstanding and making a fool of himself.

Just to show how much of a self promoting jerk he really is here is a snip from Prject Votesmart a nonpartisan information website on Policiticians voting records and issues they support :

Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. (DE)

Current Office: U.S. Senator
Current District: Senior Seat
First Elected: 11/07/1972
Last Elected: 11/05/2002
Next Election: 2008
Party: Democrat

Over the course of several weeks in 2002, this candidate repeatedly refused requests by citizens in the candidate’s own state, leaders of both major political parties, major news organizations and Project Vote Smart staff to provide voters with essential issue information in the 2002 National Political Awareness Test (NPAT).

This candidate would not provide this information to citizens in the candidate’s own state - no matter who asked them, when they were asked or how they were asked.

The NPAT is a matrix that the candidate completes to let voters know what issues they support. not what they are against per se.Check out your politician at:

vote-smart.org/
 
40.png
GoodKnight1443:
Over the course of several weeks in 2002, this candidate repeatedly refused requests by citizens in the candidate’s own state, leaders of both major political parties, major news organizations and Project Vote Smart staff to provide voters with essential issue information in the 2002 National Political Awareness Test (NPAT).

This candidate would not provide this information to citizens in the candidate’s own state - no matter who asked them, when they were asked or how they were asked.
of course, if he answered any questions on a catholic college campus…
 
40.png
Lance:
When you disagree with Katherine2 be ready for her to attack you personally.
Well Lance it appears she she dodged the analysis:eek: She dodged the satire:eek: Has she fallen ill:confused:
 
40.png
katherine2:
Catholics can publicly cal them anything they want. The Church has not accepted these calls for a heresy trial. Case closed.
Are you stating Catherine that you don’t care that these men are going against one of the most important aspects of our faith should be allowed to continue to help others murder their own innocent children? Are you stating that you don’t care that because of these men’s voting records millions of more women will go to Planned Parenthood or other places to obtain abortions? You don’t care that our tax dollars pay for some of these abortions through medicaid and other programs? That we also pay for the treatment of psychological disorders afterwards, more poverty because of drug abuse afterwards, more suicide, more difficulties of the descendants of those same families because of all of these maladies? Where is the compassion for those children, the ones murdered, and the other family members left behind? Where is the compassion for the woman herself that feels she has no choice but… ? WE as Catholics have an obligation to help those women see that the birth of that child is NOT the end of the road for her, but the beginning of life. Abortion is a mortal sin, and anyone that even supports it has already excommunicated themselves without the need for a tribunal.
 
40.png
sbcoral:
This is really crazy. How in the world can these politicians be called “heretics?” They’re not trying to promote some alternate theology; they’re just serving the constituents who elected them.

Why should we focus only on pro-choice politicians? Why doesn’t this group go after every other “Catholic” politician who has done something not in line with Church dogma - maybe someone who got divorced, or has used artificial contraception, or has skipped Mass, or who voted for an unjust war, etc.

I think the motives must be political. Why aren’t they going after moderate Republicans like Guiliani and Schwarzenegger who are Catholic and pro-choice?
Let’s remember that these people as the rest of us have the obligation to be Catholic first, than a politician. They must save their soul first. There are several things wrong with these so called Catholic politicians - first to state that they don’t have to follow their own Catholic doctrine because they have other non Catholic constituants is ludicrous. Anyone that votes for them already knows they are Catholic and what the church stands for. If they don’t know that, then they should study before they vote.
Secondly, these people have slapped the church and all of us that are Catholic in the face. They are setting a horrible example to our young people, by stating that you can disagree with doctrine for the benefit of the masses. I know people do not like when one brings up Hitler in this argument, but I don’t care, because that is exactly what he did. He claimed that nobody liked the Jews, so that they need extermination (this is just one of his many retorts about Jewish people). They are also telling the Pope that he is not inffalible and they can do whatever they want without consequences. Clearly, many of our Bishops are intimidated by these people, as they did refuse to do anything. Then again, didn’t many slap Moses in the face too, when they lost faith for their own selfishness? Don’t you think this is about selfishness and politics? If it wasn’t, why wouldn’t they fight for the one of the most important doctrines of our church? Don’t you think that these people are about getting elected rather than their faith? Who will give them the most votes? Not us… We are not a majority.
 
40.png
Lance:
When you disagree with Katherine2 be ready for her to attack you personally.
When she attacks us we should pray harder for her. We should also pray harder for us, because the power of Catholic reformists is very close to dividing us, and that is what they want. At Pax Christi Church in Eden Pairie MN, they sent a petition to the Pope asking him to change his position on abortion. Of course the Pope refused. At St Edwards Catholic church in Bloomington MN the Paster there is Pro Choice, and when he was confronted, refused to change his position. The ArchBishop has ignored requests that this Priest be talked to, even though in years past two very outspoken nuns were removed from their order for doing the same. In Minnesota, the Bishops have just wrote that we in Minnesota should all have our taxes raised to support the poor and education. Many, Many of us are appalled by this. First of all, if putting money into education has helped the poor so well, then why do we have more poor today than we had in the 70’s in the US. Throwing tax dollars into the government’s hands never means that it will get to the right people. In this state, it may mean building another government run ski area.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top