A
Abyssinia
Guest
A leading pro-life attorney who works with state legislation to protect women and unborn children from abortions is dueling with the liberal newspaper USA Today, which issued an editorial opposing abortion limits.
USA Today complains about a South Dakota bill that requires women to wait 72 hours before an abortion so they can get supportive counseling and pregnancy support from a pregnancy centers that will offer them better alternatives. Not content with the notion of showing women options other than abortion, USA Today writes, “Non-emergency abortions in South Dakota are available only at a single Planned Parenthood clinic in Sioux Falls, which performs abortions one day each week when a doctor flies in from Minnesota. If a woman lives in Rapid City, that’s a 700-mile round trip. Under the legislation, she’d have to make the trek twice, or find a place to stay in Sioux Falls during the waiting period.”
lifenews.com/2011/03/22/pro-life-attorney-takes-on-usa-today-on-promoting-abortion/
USA Today complains about a South Dakota bill that requires women to wait 72 hours before an abortion so they can get supportive counseling and pregnancy support from a pregnancy centers that will offer them better alternatives. Not content with the notion of showing women options other than abortion, USA Today writes, “Non-emergency abortions in South Dakota are available only at a single Planned Parenthood clinic in Sioux Falls, which performs abortions one day each week when a doctor flies in from Minnesota. If a woman lives in Rapid City, that’s a 700-mile round trip. Under the legislation, she’d have to make the trek twice, or find a place to stay in Sioux Falls during the waiting period.”
lifenews.com/2011/03/22/pro-life-attorney-takes-on-usa-today-on-promoting-abortion/