Pro-Marriage, Pro-Family Voices Lodge Pre-Synod Appeals

  • Thread starter Thread starter McCall1981
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

McCall1981

Guest
ncregister.com/daily-news/pro-marriage-pro-family-voices-lodge-pre-synod-appeals/

Pro-Marriage, Pro-Family Voices Lodge Pre-Synod Appeals

They call on the Church and the Pope to uphold Catholic teaching on marriage, the family and human sexuality.

BY EDWARD PENTIN 02/10/2015

– Daniel Ibáñez/CNA

VATICAN CITY — Amid continuing concerns that the upcoming Synod on the Family in October will modify Church teaching on marriage, the family and human sexuality, clergy, lay individuals and groups are increasingly trying to make their voices heard through public statements and sending open letters and petitions to Pope Francis.

One of the most vocal has been Cardinal Raymond Burke, patron of the Sovereign Order of Malta. Asked in a Feb. 8 television interview with the French channel France2 what he would do if Pope Francis insisted on allowing holy Communion for remarried divorcees, the cardinal replied: “I will resist. I cannot do anything else. There is no doubt that this is a difficult time, this is clear, this is clear.”

He also quoted a cardinal who had written to him regretting that some cardinals “have not had the courage” to oppose some of the proposals put forward at last year’s synod. “This is not good. This is not synodality, because it is necessary to say all those things that, in the Lord, it is felt that must be said,” Burke quoted the cardinal as saying.

In response to the synod of bishops calling for wide (name removed by moderator)ut “at all levels” in preparation for the assembly at the Vatican in October, large numbers Catholics have signed a “filial appeal” asking Pope Francis to address a current state of confusion regarding Church doctrine.

The appeal asks the Holy Father to reaffirm “categorically the Catholic teaching that divorced and civilly remarried Catholics cannot receive Holy Communion and that homosexual unions are contrary to Divine and natural law.”

The petition, organized by Filiale Supplica, an Italian-based group of “concerned lay Catholic leaders and pro-family organizations” from around the world, had received more than 72,000 signatures on Feb. 5 and been signed by prominent Catholic figures such as American Cardinal Raymond Burke, patron of the Sovereign Order of Malta, Chilean Cardinal Jorge Arturo Medina Estévez, who is a former prefect of the Congregation for Divine Liturgy, and former U.S. presidential candidate Rick Santorum.

Text of the Appeal

In the text of the appeal to be sent to the Pope, the signatories stress that in the face of “a decades-long sexual revolution promoted by an alliance of powerful organizations, political forces and the mass media,” Catholic teaching on the Sixth Commandment that forbids adultery “shines like a beacon in face of this ominous ideological objective.”

But they note “with anguish” that, for millions of faithful Catholics, the beacon “seems to have dimmed” because of the “onslaught of lifestyles spread by anti-Christian lobbies.” The resulting confusion, they said, has led to “a breach” that has opened within the Church, which would “accept adultery by permitting divorced and then civilly remarried Catholics to receive Holy Communion,” and “virtually accept homosexual unions” when such practices are “categorically condemned as being contrary to Divine and natural law.”

For this reason, the signatories are hoping a word from the Pope would “clarify the growing confusion amongst the faithful,” prevent Christ’s teaching from being “watered-down,” and “dispel the darkness looming over our children’s future should that beacon no longer light their way.”

“Holy Father, we implore you to say this word,” say the signatories, who also include Virginia Coda Nunziante, president of Italy’s March for Life, Austin Ruse, the head of C-Fam, and Robert Royal, president of the Faith and Reason Institute. “We do so with a heart devoted to all that you are and represent. We do so with the certainty that your word will never disassociate pastoral practice from the teaching bequeathed by Jesus Christ and his vicars — as this would only add to the confusion.”

Asked why he put his name to the petition, Robert Royal told the Register: “I don’t usually sign public appeals, but the confusion that is starting to grow about Church teaching on marriage and all things sexual cannot be ignored.”

He added, “These questions are just too crucial to everyday human life, let alone holiness. This letter gently and sincerely asks the Holy Father for a clarification.”

Royal explained that in view of Pope Francis’ own admission that he sometimes is misunderstood, “it’s not a bad idea for him to issue some sort of clarification before the political campaigns to influence the October 2015 get into full swing.”

(Read the rest there)
 
I hope that Papa Francis takes their letter and files it in the circular file under his desk,😃
 
Wasn’t it me that posted just a couple hours ago that Burke engages in *covert *activities? How predictable was that!!! 😉
 
I hope that Papa Francis takes their letter and files it in the circular file under his desk,😃
I think Papa Francis has already addressed it, but there is so much reporting of so many things he says, that it gets lost in the chatter.

In general, there seems to be a good bit of confusion between form and substance. Not that that issue is particularly new.
 
Like I said just a couple hours ago, “covert” activity keeps on surfacing more and more. Johnny-on-the-spot, McCall, as usual. Petitions will not force the pope to allay their fears prior to the synod. Bet on it. They have no concern for the tremendous anguish they cause Pope Francis in distributing this, expecting him to cow-tow to their demands.
 
From the article:
The disquiet among many Catholics comes on the heels of comments made last month by Cardinal Lorenzo Baldisseri, organizer of the Synod of Bishops. At a Rome conference on the synod, the general secretary of the synod seemed to suggest that “dogma has its own evolution.”
Expanding on that statement, which many Catholics found troubling, Cardinal Baldisseri said, “We want to discuss things, but not in order to call things into doubt, but, rather, to view it in a new context and with a new awareness.”
He also publicly revealed for the first time that Pope Francis had seen the controversial interim document during last year’s synod before it was sent out.
The document caused consternation among many of the synod fathers, leading Church figures and many Catholics when it proposed new pastoral practices for remarried divorcees, same-sex couples and those cohabiting.
I saw the recent comments from Cardinal Baldisseri and I am supportive of this effort here in response. I don’t think there is much more to it than that. Dialogue. Isn’t that what we are supposed to be doing? I thought that was good. These are my people speaking their peace. (and mine)
 
Like I said just a couple hours ago, “covert” activity keeps on surfacing more and more. Johnny-on-the-spot, McCall, as usual. Petitions will not force the pope to allay their fears prior to the synod. Bet on it. They have no concern for the tremendous anguish they cause Pope Francis in distributing this, expecting him to cow-tow to their demands.
Given the shenanigans of the last Synod, it’s clear who is trying to manipulate who.
 
Given the shenanigans of the last Synod, it’s clear who is trying to manipulate who.
and given the clear, public and unequivocal statements by the Pope recently that no doctrine is going to be changed, it is not the Pope who is doing any manipulating.
 
and given the clear, public and unequivocal statements by the Pope recently that no doctrine is going to be changed, it is not the Pope who is doing any manipulating.
But doctrine may be ignored.
 
It never has been in 2000 years; why would you think it would now?
I hope you are correct in your opinion, but the Winnipeg Statement in response to Humanae Vitae comes to mind. Doctrine most likely will not change, but with the statements from such as Cardinal Kasper, Cardinal Marx, et al, I just wonder as to the “Pastoral Approach” which might just ignore or circumvent Doctrine. We shall just have to wait, Pray, and see what transpires.

Have a very Blessed Lent.
 
I hope you are correct in your opinion, but the Winnipeg Statement in response to Humanae Vitae comes to mind. Doctrine most likely will not change, but with the statements from such as Cardinal Kasper, Cardinal Marx, et al, I just wonder as to the “Pastoral Approach” which might just ignore or circumvent Doctrine. We shall just have to wait, Pray, and see what transpires.

Have a very Blessed Lent.
Perhaps I was bit to terse.

In 2000 years, the Church has not ignored doctrine nor overturned doctrine.

When I use the tem “Church”, I mean the Magisterial teaching authority - the bishops in union with the Pope.

As the Winnipeg statement is not within that definitional parameter, it is not evidence of any break in the 2000 year history of the Church. Just as the gnostic heresy in the early Church, which took down many bishops, was not within that definition.
 
I wouldn’t have been worried about the synod if it weren’t for the terrible midterm report and the Burke punishment.
 
Perhaps I was bit to terse.

In 2000 years, the Church has not ignored doctrine nor overturned doctrine.

When I use the tem “Church”, I mean the Magisterial teaching authority - the bishops in union with the Pope.

As the Winnipeg statement is not within that definitional parameter, it is not evidence of any break in the 2000 year history of the Church. Just as the gnostic heresy in the early Church, which took down many bishops, was not within that definition.
That is correct. And it is not the Magesterial teaching I fear. It is the disenters who will use any ambiguity or pastoral concerns to drive a wedge into the body of Christ. And just as the gnostics and the arians, many were deceived. I pray for clarity and definitive statements from the Synod that uphold the perinial teachings, with pastoral aspects and charity towards those in irregular situations. We know that there is a faction within the Church that are pushing an agenda. At this particular moment in history, clarity is of the utmost importance.
 
That is correct. And it is not the Magesterial teaching I fear. It is the disenters who will use any ambiguity or pastoral concerns to drive a wedge into the body of Christ. And just as the gnostics and the arians, many were deceived. I pray for clarity and definitive statements from the Synod that uphold the perinial teachings, with pastoral aspects and charity towards those in irregular situations. We know that there is a faction within the Church that are pushing an agenda. At this particular moment in history, clarity is of the utmost importance.
There have been wedges in the Church since the Ascension, and will continue to be to the Second Coming. And I am not trying to impudent about it.

Those who choose to follow the Magisterium, what ever the Magisterium does, will be fine; and those who don’t are exercising the free will that God gave us, and will be responsible for the choices.

We have had a wedge ever since Vatican 2 - or rather, multiple wedges, more on the left than the right, but definitely on both ends. And the wedge that resulted after Humanae Vitae was perhaps even more devastating.

I am not suggesting that I am not concerned about wedges; perhaps a bit more that I am calloused enough from all the rubbing the wrong way that I choose to follow the Church and not worry too much about the crazies - whom we will always have with us.

I have Adoration in 15 minutes - that is where I put effort.
 
In response to bishops calling for wide (name removed by moderator)ut “at all levels” in preparation for the assembly at the Vatican in October, large numbers of Catholics have signed a “filial appeal” asking Pope Francis to address the current state of confusion regarding Church doctrine.
Many thanks, McCall.

Link in OP will access the appeal. Remember church history and the time during the reign of John XXII when the laity vocalized the consternation over the proposed novelty concerning the teaching of the Beatific Vision. Church teaching prevailed then, as it will now.
 
There have been wedges in the Church since the Ascension, and will continue to be to the Second Coming. And I am not trying to impudent about it.

Those who choose to follow the Magisterium, what ever the Magisterium does, will be fine; and those who don’t are exercising the free will that God gave us, and will be responsible for the choices.

We have had a wedge ever since Vatican 2 - or rather, multiple wedges, more on the left than the right, but definitely on both ends. And the wedge that resulted after Humanae Vitae was perhaps even more devastating.

I am not suggesting that I am not concerned about wedges; perhaps a bit more that I am calloused enough from all the rubbing the wrong way that I choose to follow the Church and not worry too much about the crazies - whom we will always have with us.

I have Adoration in 15 minutes - that is where I put effort.
Wedges as you put it, and describe above very well. That is what I referenced in my earlier comment about the spirit of Vatican II. Catholics with a do-it-yourself approach.

Speaking generally, I do marvel at how this happens in the Catholic Church - the Protestants just split and split and split over these wedges. Yes, there are 500 different denominations, no argument there, but at least you and the ten other people in the room follow your teachings. 😉 (until of course there is further disagreement and you split 5/5)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top