Problem with movies always have naked women

  • Thread starter Thread starter summerlily72
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m talking about the pseudo respect that it pretends; films and shows addressing women as “actor” or, in a military scene, as “sir” to pretend to denote respect for the female–yet this comes at the price of the female having to morph into a male personal.
It doesn’t require any such thing. If there is a gender neutral term it is appropriate to use it. Do you think “actor” is masculine? What about doctor? Should women who are doctors be called doctresses? “Paging Doctress Leader!” Really?

I’m unaware of any military ranks that still require “sir” instead of madam or are you talking about when someone sarcastically calls a woman “sir”? Again, they are not morphing into anything. I’m not sure why a man gets a say in the title that women prefer. Hmm. You say later that we are supposed to challenge you but when we do you reject it…hmmm. Methinks you don’t really mean that but that you are patronizing me. :stepford smile: That’s nice.
Exactly; what I am saying is that females must not emulate the wickedness of the morally corrupt but fight for their rights
First, a pet peeve: Women, not females.

And suggesting that women are becoming the morally corrupt in order to fight for their rights is another caricature out of the “I hate feminism” handbook. If women fight dirty it’s because they are human, not trying to emulate the failings of men. As far as
even if it means that they are not as well-off financially or even if their “progress” are met with scorn, disdain, and obstacles.
been there, done that. How long to we have to do this anyway? How about if men stop trying to thwart any woman’s efforts to be successful. It’s the whiny-man baby snowflake-rapists of the world who use their power to impede her ability to succeed. Men help each other all the time and some men are strong enough to help a woman, or just get out of her way, to the top.
But that’s just it; you should not accept that. You should challenge me (the world) but do so not to be me or allow me to patronize you… demand an equal exchange by proposing and doing what is conductive to human dignity.
I don’t, actually. I don’t have to challenge you. For one, I realized earlier that I wasn’t going to convince you. For another, it. is. not. my. job. I do not have to invest the time, energy, intellect when you could let your fingers do the walking. Listen to women. Read what women have to say. Think. I can’t do your thinking for you. I’ve responded to your questions and you are simply recycling what you’ve said earlier and what I recognize as dated anti-feminist rhetoric. Do better. If you want to understand something foreign to you and feminism is, you will have to put in serious effort. The problem is that you think you already have. You were misinformed. You were taught dog-Latin instead of the real thing. You were taught history that excluded the contributions of women. I know I was.

And if you patronize me…I’m not allowing it. You are doing it. Do better.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top