Problems w/ Atheism

  • Thread starter Thread starter srferdave
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Churchill was the one who specifically requested that Hymn for the Service. Take it as you like it. 🙂
yes, but he still wasn’t a Christian. You don’t have to be a Christian to lead Christians (just ask Jefferson, Hamilton, Franklin, Paine, Adams, or Madison) 🙂
 
BTW you do realize the entire premise of your argument is a false cause fallacy? You have no proof atheism informed the evil of Stalin, and given the immense role Christianity played in his life, it’s just as likely Christianity influenced his psychology as opposed to reading a single book :tiphat:
Yankee, with all due respect you had no idea what Stalin’s family’s religious denomination was on this thread until I informed you it was not Catholicism. Again, I reiterate Stalin used his time at a seminary for illegal Revolutionary Marxist underground activity and reading up on Marx in his youth, not the Bible. I could go into further detail as to the particularities of Georgian students studying under Russian Orthodox teachers, and the nationality question in Tsarist Russia, but I don’t think you would get it. You are too quick to jump into areas you may be unsure of.

What exactly do you know of Stalin? At least I have studied him and his personal life in University through the writings of Adam Ulam, Robert Service, Richard Overy, Simon Montefiore and way too many other profs to mention. Robert Conquest in his biography of Stalin points out Stalin exclaiming Marxism is our Religion! I will take Stalin’s word on himself over your word on him any day. And atheism was central to Stalin’s belief. Do you have any idea how many priests, bishops, rabbis, and religious Stalin killed? If Stalin was informed by Christianity in his beliefs (first time I have ever heard this:( ) then why kill the Church and on top of that the Synagogue? This is ridiculous. There was a Society of the Godless specifically built under the Soviet Union. You are straining credulity to ask me to believe such a man was shaped and moved by Christianity as opposed to Marxism and thuggery. Or do you approve of Stalin’s massacres of priests, rabbis, bishops, religious?
 
Hmm I thought we both discussed this once before and we agreed Smith, genuinely interested in Moral Principles, could better be described agnostic.

I take it you’re a freemarketer. Are you familiar with the atheist objectivist Ayn Rand and her acute individualism? 🙂
Ayn Rand was a thinker after my own heart (or I guess I would be after her own heart … anyway, she followed a great philosophy) 👍
 
Yankee, with all due respect you had no idea what Stalin’s family’s religious denomination was on this thread until I informed you it was not Catholicism.
Stalin studied to become a Catholic priest. You can minimize the implications anyway you like …
Again, I reiterate Stalin used his time at a seminary for illegal Revolutionary Marxist underground activity and reading up on Marx in his youth, not the Bible. I could go into further detail as to the particularities of Georgian students studying under Russian Orthodox teachers, and the nationality question in Tsarist Russia, but I don’t think you would get it. You are too quick to jump into areas you may be unsure of.
I’m sure you studied Stalin more in depth than I have (my people never produced any in-bread psychopaths like Hitler or Stalin … so we’re less interested in their life stories. When they pop up we either kill them or defeat them in some other way).
What exactly do you know of Stalin?
more than I ever wanted to
At least I have studied him and his personal life in University through the writings of Adam Ulam, Robert Service, Richard Overy, and way too many other profs to mention.
good for you 👍

To people like me names like Stalin invoke one word … enemy!
Robert Conquest in his biography of Stalin points out Stalin exclaiming Marxism is our Religion! I will take Stalin’s word on himself over your word on him any day. And atheism was central to Stalin’s belief.
In Europe these psychopaths were always produced by the Catholics.
Do you have any idea how many priests, bishops, rabbis, and religious Stalin killed? If Stalin was informed by Christianity in his beliefs (first time I have ever heard this:( ) then why kill the Church and Synagogue?
because they must have really ticked him off :eek:

put it this way, if religion never influenced Stalin, then why did he hate it so much? You don’t hate something that you’re oblivious towards.
This is ridiculous. There was a Society of the Godless specifically built under the Soviet Union. You are straining credulity to ask me to believe such a man was shaped and moved by Christianity as opposed to Marxism and thuggery. Or do you approve of Stalin’s massacres of priests, rabbis, bishops, religious?
You’re saying
  1. Stalin is bad
  2. Stalin was an atheist
  3. Therefore atheism is bad
classic false cause fallacy (nothing more than an argument designed for stupid hill billies) :confused:
 
Me: when I see a guy pushing someone on the streets I might automatically think “phone the cops” or help out if necessary and, not as you aver: oh, well, I think he’s a jerk but he is no more “objectively” right in pushing that someone around than I am for thinking him a jerk. Your own personal “values” tell you what to think.
Um, my values would lead me to call the cops if I saw a crime being committed. I was just talking about people shoving each other while walking in the street. It’s not terribly uncommon in cities.
I hate it but, well, my “values” tell me one thing, the Soviets “value” another thing. Hmmm. Who can say who is “right”. Nobody in AntiT’s amoral world: it just turns into a brute power struggle between your values and the other side’s. You may not desire it, but your worldview basically works out in the end to “might makes right” for all intents and purposes.
I wouldn’t say that “might makes right” because “right,” I’ve been arguing, has no objective meaning. My worldview boils down to “might”: the stronger will is always going to prevail in a situation. So I’m going to do my best to make sure that my will, my values, are the ones that win out.

It’s perfectly consistent to believe that only values exist and then to act passionately on the basis of those values.
 
Stalin studied to become a Catholic priest.
Yankee you are attempting to make a logical argument but you cannot even get an elementary fact right! Stalin, for the 3rd time on this thread now, did not study to become a Catholic priest. I cannot understand how you cannot understand this so why bother with logical argumentation? Stalin was in a Russian Orthodox seminary for a while. Do you actually understand that Catholicism doesn’t equal Russian Orthodoxy?

Or one better. Name one legitimate source or book that claims Stalin studied to become a Catholic priest! There is none. REALLY THERE IS NONE. Please, for your own sake, get the facts right first, and then you can attempt to show me your superior logic. At least get your facts straight before you attempt to belittle poor ole me. Or why bother. 🤷
 
Um, my values would lead me to call the cops if I saw a crime being committed. I was just talking about people shoving each other while walking in the street. It’s not terribly uncommon in cities.

I wouldn’t say that “might makes right” because “right,” I’ve been arguing, has no objective meaning. My worldview boils down to “might”: the stronger will is always going to prevail in a situation. So I’m going to do my best to make sure that my will, my values, are the ones that win out.

It’s perfectly consistent to believe that only values exist and then to act passionately on the basis of those values.
Anti T. I cannot say I agree with you at all but I wish to thank you for your civility here.🙂
 
Yankee you are attempting to make a logical argument but you cannot even get an elementary fact right! Stalin, for the 3rd time on this thread now, did not study to become a Catholic priest. I cannot understand how you cannot understand this so why bother with logical argumentation? Stalin was in a Russian Orthodox seminary for a while. Do you actually understand that Catholicism doesn’t equal Russian Orthodoxy?

Or one better. Name one legitimate source or book that claims Stalin studied to become a Catholic priest! There is none. REALLY THERE IS NONE. Please, for your own sake, get the facts right first, and then you can attempt to show me your superior logic. At least get your facts straight before you attempt to belittle poor ole me. Or why bother. 🤷
  • Joseph Stalin (1879-1953)
The man who turned the Soviet Union from a backward country into a world superpower at unimaginable human cost. Stalin was born into a dysfunctional family in a poor village in Georgia. Permanently scarred from a childhood bout with smallpox and having a mildly deformed arm, Stalin always felt unfairly treated by life, and thus developed a strong, romanticized desire for greatness and respect, combined with a shrewd streak of calculating cold-heartedness towards those who had maligned him. He always felt a sense of inferiority before educated intellectuals, and particularly distrusted them.

Sent by his mother to the seminary in Tiflis (now Tbilisi), the capital of Georgia, to study to become a priest, the young Stalin never completed his education, and was instead soon completely drawn into the city’s active revolutionary circles. Never a fiery intellectual polemicist or orator like Lenin or Trotsky, Stalin specialized in the humdrum nuts and bolts of revolutionary activity, risking arrest every day by helping organize workers, distributing illegal literature, and robbing trains to support the cause, while Lenin and his bookish friends lived safely abroad and wrote clever articles about the plight of the Russian working class. Although Lenin found Stalin’s boorishness offensive at times, he valued his loyalty, and appointed him after the Revolution to various low-priority leadership positions in the new Soviet government.*

pbs.org/redfiles/bios/all_bio_joseph_stalin.htm

He didn’t finish his studies, but he studied to become a priest; and I think PBS is an adequate source.

Now that I’ve provided a source, can you name a single European tyrant who wasn’t jaded by the Catholic Church before they finally went crazy :eek:
 
  • Joseph Stalin (1879-1953)
The man who turned the Soviet Union from a backward country into a world superpower at unimaginable human cost. Stalin was born into a dysfunctional family in a poor village in Georgia. Permanently scarred from a childhood bout with smallpox and having a mildly deformed arm, Stalin always felt unfairly treated by life, and thus developed a strong, romanticized desire for greatness and respect, combined with a shrewd streak of calculating cold-heartedness towards those who had maligned him. He always felt a sense of inferiority before educated intellectuals, and particularly distrusted them.

Sent by his mother to the seminary in Tiflis (now Tbilisi), the capital of Georgia, to study to become a priest, the young Stalin never completed his education, and was instead soon completely drawn into the city’s active revolutionary circles. Never a fiery intellectual polemicist or orator like Lenin or Trotsky, Stalin specialized in the humdrum nuts and bolts of revolutionary activity, risking arrest every day by helping organize workers, distributing illegal literature, and robbing trains to support the cause, while Lenin and his bookish friends lived safely abroad and wrote clever articles about the plight of the Russian working class. Although Lenin found Stalin’s boorishness offensive at times, he valued his loyalty, and appointed him after the Revolution to various low-priority leadership positions in the new Soviet government.*

pbs.org/redfiles/bios/all_bio_joseph_stalin.htm
That is absolutely right. I saw that series on PBS. You just need to understand that the seminary in Tbilisi was a Russian Orthodox Seminary, and not a Catholic Seminary. He was being sent to become an Orthodox priest, not Catholic. Please tell me you understand the difference between Orthodox and Catholic! The Russian Orthodox Church by this time had become a State-Sponsored Institution of Russification under the Tsars (Stalin was Georgian). Georgia is an Orthodox country - one of the first Christian countries on earth after Armenia. Yankee, all you need now is to understand the difference between Orthodoxy and Catholicism but I am not sure you get it as you conflate the two. Catholicism was only practiced in Tsarist Russia in tsarist-controlled Poland and western Ukraine.

Again - repeat - the seminary in Tbilisi was not Catholic. I hope you get this.
 
He didn’t finish his studies, but he studied to become a priest; and I think PBS is an adequate source.

Now that I’ve provided a source, can you name a single European tyrant who wasn’t jaded by the Catholic Church before they finally went crazy :eek:*

Yankee I just did, if only you could understand European history. What is the point of spending time debating if I cannot even establish a primary fact that Stalin wasn’t raised Catholic with you. I feel I’ve just lost half an hour that could have been better spent so I’ll make my response short.

I just named one single tyrant not jaded by the Catholic Church: Stalin, to which I will add Lenin, Trotsky, Khrushchev, for now. Sorry if I go to other threads later.🤷
 
Yankee I just did, if only you could understand European history. What is the point of spending time debating if I cannot even establish a primary fact that Stalin wasn’t raised Catholic with you. I feel I’ve just lost half an hour that could have been better spent so I’ll make my response short.

I just named one single tyrant not jaded by the Catholic Church: Stalin, to which I will add Lenin, Trotsky, Khrushchev, for now. Sorry if I go to other threads later.🤷
Stalin was raised in the Orthodox Church. Every single source I’ve looked at (all credible) confirm it. Why should I believe you? I even found a Catholic source that confirms it:

The poverty of the atheist argument becomes clear with a bit of examination. What does it prove to say that Hitler was raised Catholic? Stalin was raised in the Orthodox Church. Mao was raised as a Buddhist. Lots of people repudiate their religious upbringing.

catholiceducation.org/articles/apologetics/ap0214.htm

So let’s review. I provided an excerpt from two articles (one from PBS the other from Catholic Education Resource Center), you provided zero?

You guys are getting incensed because we’ve taken your old fallacious argument and turned it right around on you (because it is much more logical to assume Catholicism influenced their evil actions versus atheism).

Stalin thought he was a god … where did he ever get that idea from (certainly not atheism).
 
It looks like Andrew is right on this particular issue. It seems that Stalin was studying to be a priest in the Russian Orthodox Church, which is a dfferent religion than Catholicism.
 
It looks like Andrew is right on this particular issue. It seems that Stalin was studying to be a priest in the Russian Orthodox Church, which is a dfferent religion than Catholicism.
Hey thanks AntiT. I’m not sure why Yankee isn’t getting it.🙂
 
It looks like Andrew is right on this particular issue. It seems that Stalin was studying to be a priest in the Russian Orthodox Church, which is a dfferent religion than Catholicism.
Orthodox is a Catholic Church (albeit not “Roman” Catholic).
 
Orthodox is a Catholic Church (albeit not “Roman” Catholic).
Let’s get this right so we don’t create confusion: the Catholic Church is headed by a pope the Orthodox Church is not, there are 22 rites within the Catholic Church, one of which is the Latin rite, i.e., “roman” (which by the way started off as a perjorative), there are none however that are refered to as the “orthodox” rite that’s because the Orthodox Church is a separate Christian body with a separate church structure. That being the case Stalin was not a Catholic. By your reasoning anyone who is Orthodox (and/or Anglican) would be labeled Catholic and (literally) part of the Catholic Church.
 
I think this was asked already by someone else, but I don’t remember seeing a response: exactly what bearing does Stalin’s religions affiliation have on anything?

If we’re just playing the “Stalin was an atheist and he was never, never a Catholic” game, then I’m sure we can pull out a very long list of nasty people who actually were Catholic in response. However, I’m not sure what a guilt-by-association contest like this would prove.
 
Orthodox is a Catholic Church (albeit not “Roman” Catholic).
The Russian Orthodox Church is not “Catholic” in any sense, it is ethnic eastern orthodox, this is at odds with the very definintion of “Catholic” which means “Universal”. Further, the “Catholic” church isn’t the “Roman Catholic” church, “Roman Catholic” refers to the “Members of the Catholic Church which follows the Roman Rite”, the “Catholic Church” happens to be centered in a independant city (vatican city) contianed within Rome.

With regard to the Russian Orthodox Church (which is what Stalin was a member of prior to turning to Athism), this church is in schism, as are all ethnic Eastern Orthodox Churchs with Rome. There are… Some talks of reunification, but nothing concrete. Regardless, Stalin had no formal connection to the Catholic Church personally. When he rose to power finally, he oppressed all churches, including his own Russian Orthodox Church equally, as an Athiest.
 
I think this was asked already by someone else, but I don’t remember seeing a response: exactly what bearing does Stalin’s religions affiliation have on anything?

If we’re just playing the “Stalin was an atheist and he was never, never a Catholic” game, then I’m sure we can pull out a very long list of nasty people who actually were Catholic in response. However, I’m not sure what a guilt-by-association contest like this would prove.
Gearhead mayhap you didn’t understand the point we were arguing, and that is “Stalin was not Catholic,” therefore his “catholicism” could have had no bearing on his beliefs. Furthermore, if people can’t get their facts straight (on this one detail), don’t expect others to just shut up about it.

p.s. And it’s telling how you think we’re the ones playing a game?
 
Gearhead mayhap you didn’t understand the point we were arguing, and that is “Stalin was not Catholic,” therefore his “catholicism” could have had no bearing on his beliefs. Furthermore, if people can’t get their facts straight (on this one detail), don’t expect others to just shut up about it.
You’ve corrected him - several times now. And unless Stalin’s beliefs has some relevance to the OP, it’s off-topic. With that in mind: what’s the relevance to the OP? What bearing does the denomination of Stalin’s seminary have on the correctness of atheism?
p.s. And it’s telling how you think we’re the ones playing a game?
The “Stalin was an atheist” game is a game. At the very least, it’s certainly not a rational argument against atheism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top