D
Dchsknight
Guest
So what now, where is your Authoritative Genealogy?
Please start a new thread if you would like to discuss the apostasy and “authoritative genealogy”. I don’t think you took the time to understand what you read, because the apostasy isn’t about claiming the “Bible has fallen”. Also, Orthodox Christians, who claim that they are also the true Church, and which the Catholic Church says has valid apostolic succession, valid (though maybe illicit) sacraments and orders, would not be impressed by the list of Popes, as they also believe much of current though on the office of the Pope (infallibility, supremacy, etc) are innovations. We are not either, especially because of the apostasy. If there were changes in Christian beliefs, the long list of Popes also would not matter.Looked it up, knew about it and mormons fail at claiming that the Bible has fallen, here is why: we unlike any other ‘Faith’ can trace our Authority back to Jesus Christ. You can not. Here is our Authoritative Genology:
Were is yours? St. Peter got his Authority from Jesus and passed it on. So were is your Authority. Were did Jesus Himself empower, your Authority to Forgive sin and Set up the Church. Cause their is ours, and you can search and all of the History you will find will back this up.
( see next post for list, aparently it is too big.)
That’s the problem. The Book of Mormon is not credible. I love the scriptures enough to realize the Book of Mormon isn’t scripture. I can receive communication from God through the Spirit without the Book of Mormon. I can change my way of life to conform to God’s will without the Book of Mormon. I was one of those who was entrapped by Mormonism as a teenager and thankfully was able to find out the truth about it. After 34 years of Mormonism I entered the Catholic Church three years ago. It wasn’t easy to admit that I had been wrong about Mormonism or to leave the tradition I had developed in Mormonism behind, but the Book of Mormon has been proven to be untrue. Add to that all of the historical problems in Mormonism such as polygamy and Joseph Smith’s general dishonesty and there is nothing about Mormonism worth saving.Prodigal Son and others,
The Book of Mormon is a test of our hearts desires. Do we want to receive communication from God by the influence of the Spirit, even if it means changing our way of life or our attitudes? Do we love God enough to do that? Do we love the scriptures such as the Bible enough to believe that God would want a group of people He was leading into a new world, to have the words of the Bible for themselves and their posterity in the place He was going to lead them to? If not, the reader puts the book down, goes on their way, and has not been coddled into trying to be persuaded to believe something beyond what they want to believe. Others give the situation described the benefit of plausiblity, and read on.
Add to that all of the historical problems in Mormonism such as polygamy and Joseph Smith’s general dishonesty and there is nothing about Mormonism worth saving.
Are you convinced the Book of Mormon is the translation of the work of real ancient Native Americans or do you just believe it is spiritually true?BartBurk,
My point was that you are being allowed to believe exactly what you want to believe. I love the Bible as much as or perhaps more than yourself. I could quote it verbatim for perhaps a solid hour. I also love the Book of Mormon. Just because you think it doesn’t read 'like the Bible" doesn’t mean it couldn’t also be scripture from God’s prophets. People have different languages, different idioms, different ways of expressing themselves. If one reads the Psalms one does not find the exact same writing style as the words of Isaiah, but they are both scripture. (Actually, the Biblical translation is complicated in this respect because Tyndale and Wycliffe brought into English their understanding of the translation, and it is beautiful but it uses their manner of expression.)
You will do fine with your beliefs. I do not chastise you for those beliefs, even if you have misgivings about things I know to be true. You are entitled to believe as you choose to do. If you want more, there is more to know. If not, you have plenty of excuses to stay with the knowledge and understanding that you want to have and live by. Enjoy going it from there.
Fair question. I am certain that it is the work of a group of people (their prophet leaders) who lived in ancient America. I also am certain that it is spiritually true, as is the Bible.Are you convinced the Book of Mormon is the translation of the work of real ancient Native Americans or do you just believe it is spiritually true?
So long as there are 50,000 LDS missionaries going door-to-door telling people that our beliefs are an abomination and that we who profess those beliefs are corrupt, then yes we have to malign the LDS church to defend our faith.Our civilization could go either way, based on collective choices of us, the people living today. I am heartily glad the Catholic church has taken the stand it has taken on many issues. There are many good people in that faith tradition. You are in good company. But no need to malign the LDS church in the process of trying to defend your own beliefs.
I’m all for seeking peace, but that doesn’t mean ignoring falsehoods. I’ll seek peace with Muslims, but I’m not going to back off if someone tries to tell me that Islam is true. The same with Mormonism.I’ll add a postscript. First, sorry about two misspelled words I didn’t catch as I typed earlier today. Second, here is a quote from the Pope:
“Added to this is the need for all those who believe in God to join in seeking peace, to attempt to draw closer to one another, and to journey together, even with their differing images of God, towards the source of Light - this is interreligious dialogue.”
I hope that statement is something we can agree on. I totally agree with it.
Sorry, Paul…I was addressing Parker…he must have changed it since my inquiry…because now he is defined as LDS…Are you addressing me? It says “Catholic”, not “Orthodox”.
And why do you think our Orthodox brothers would defend a 19th-century work of fiction?
It is exactly the same thing. The creed that I recite at mass every Sunday is my belief. Saying that the creed is an abomination is saying that my beliefs are an abomination. And saying that “all those professors are corrupt” is saying that I, a professor of that creed, am corrupt.PaulDupre,
They have not been taught to do that. There is a huge difference between words that say “creeds are an abomination” and words that say “your beliefs are an abomination.” I don’t think in those terms at all, nor do I “think you are corrupt.”
Let’s examine this statement. Webster’s New World College Dictionary defines abomination as“they [Christian churches] were all wrong; and the Personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt;” - Joseph Smith History as published in The Pearl of Great Price
The same dictionary defines professor as
- an abominating; great hatred and disgust; loathing
- Anything hateful and disgusting.
The dictionary defines corrupt as
- a person who professes something; esp., one who openly declares his sentiments, religious beliefs, etc.
Here is the Nicene Creed, the most-often recited Christian Creed and the one I as a Catholic profess at mass every Sunday:
- Changed from a sound condition to an unsound one; spoiled; contaminated; rotten
- deteriorated from the normal or standard; specif,. a) morally unsound or debased; perverted; evil; depraved
We believe in one God,
the Father, the Almighty,
maker of heaven and earth,
of all that is, seen and unseen.
We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ,
the only Son of God,
eternally begotten of the Father,
God from God, light from light,
true God from true God,
begotten, not made,
one in Being with the Father;
through him all things were made.
For us men and for our salvation
he came down from heaven,
by the power of the Holy Spirit,
he was born of the Virgin Mary
and became man.
For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate;
he suffered, died and was buried.
On the third day he rose again
in fulfillment of the Scriptures;
he ascended into heaven
and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead,
and his kingdom will have no end.
We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life,
who proceeds from the Father and the Son,
with the Father and the Son he is worshiped and glorified,
he has spoken through the prophets.
Now tell me, ParkerD, what part of my creed is filthy, hateful and disgusting?We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church.
We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.
We look for the resurrection of the dead,
and the life of the world to come. Amen.