D
Dovekin
Guest
This is not a conclusion, but a statement of opinion in the first paragraph of my note. It is not “fallacious argumentation” but common practice. It is like a spelling bee, where you say the word first, then spell it, then repeat the word. The spelling is like a debate’s argument, the repetition of the word is the conclusion. But the first statement of my position is not a conclusion, so it is not “fallacious argumentation.”It is still fake news . . .
I do not see anything remotely similar to this statement. We are agreed PV is a right wing group, aren’t we? There is a link @ rightwing to support that identification.It basically says “We label this a “right wing” group. Therefore their report has just gotta be wrong!”
.The wiki post was actually FAKE.
This is ipse dixit. It is a conclusion based on your erroneous reading that the article says right wing means wrong. it is framed as an accusation, wile my use of “fake news” was a clarification that it was not the same use of the concept from our earlier discussion.
I ctied the Wikipedia description to show that PV has a reputation for deceptively editing videos, audiotapes, etc. it does not really matter if the reputation is deserved, I am just pointing out that it is their reputation.They call ANY editing “deceptive”.
I believe the reputation is well deserved. The California Attorney General’s report on ACORN analyzes the tapes made in California and has comments like this about the LA office:
Tapes were edited by someone who admitted seeking to damage ACORN and they exclude exculpatory remarks by ACORN employees. That sounds like deceptive editing to me, but maybe you have a different idea of what is deceptive?The released recordings did not include all Giles’ statements regarding The released recordings did not include all Giles’ statements regarding the abusive pimp, her tragic life, and fear for the underage girls, or Stewart’s statements that ACORN could not help. abusive pimp, her tragic life, and fear for the underage girls, or Stewart’s statements that ACORN could not help.
I am not the person to teach you what ipse dixit means or other fine points of debating, so I am going to stop here despite the errors in the rest of your note.