Prolifers how would you answer this? Women should be allowed abortion because

Status
Not open for further replies.
i will say that yes, theses health and psychological issues (due to hormones) are real and a risk, but abortion is not a preventive cure against all pregnancy side effects.

Abortion is a real risk for the soul.
 
Last edited:
parents who loose babies from genetic illness does not failed in the simpliest tasks, however hard it is.
They can separated, but with abortion, it is also a real risk.
 
I honestly don’t know. I am very pro-life. It should only be allowed in cases of rape or if the mother’s life is in danger. Even then it is a hard decision to make.
 
In all sincerity, someone who is “very pro life” is not pro abortion in any situation.
 
True,but if a mother’s life is in danger or is raped,then abortion may be a possibility. I am not promoting it though, I understand very well how wrong abortion is.
 
But why the exception for rape? Should the child be executed for the sins of the father?
 
NeedANap said:
But why the exception for rape? Should the child be executed for the sins of the father?
Click to expand...
Exactly. This is nothing more than abortion industry propaganda that a rape victim will be ok after her abortion. That’s because the abortion industry couldn’t care less about women. The pro life side does. Including our church and it’s many charities and services for desperate women and children.
 
If a mother dies during pregnancy, I would pray that she dies in friendship with God and it leads to heaven.

We cannot directly abort (kill) an unborn human because of something that might happen.

With modern medicine, in most cases, both mother and child can survive. If not, medical professionals try to save both. We never directly kill either one.
 
TheLittleLady said:
We cannot directly abort (kill) an unborn human because of something that might happen.

With modern medicine, in most cases, both mother and child can survive. If not, medical professionals try to save both. We never directly kill either one.
Click to expand...
The operative word is directly. Treating the mother is morally acceptable, even if that treatment will kill the baby.
 
Rape is a very serious thing. A women who was raped might not be physiologically ready to carry a baby or give birth. It is also morally right to treat a mother’s illness instead of saving the baby. Again,I am not saying abortion is right or that I support it,but there can be special cases.
 
Those are nonsensical assertions. I mean, a pregnant woman could be struck by lightning. Good grief!

Ask these “free-thinkers” if they support the death penalty or not. Probably not.

OK, then, ask them what crime the baby has committed that deserves the death penalty - without an attorney or a fair trial!

Ask them if their own mother was traumatized by pregnancy and childbirth. If so, should they then be retroactively aborted? I mean, maybe she is still traumatized because they are alive - and that only keeps the pregnancy/childbirth wound open.

Is this nonsensical also? Of course, but no more so than their pseudo-arguments.
 
Last edited:
This is why rape IS a pro-life issue. We who claim to be pro life, have we donated to or volunteered time with our local rape crisis center? When a woman has been raped (a man as well, men are victims of rape, however, the pregnancy issue is not the same) she deserves to have such great medical, emotional, spiritual, legal and financial help that the thought of abortion would not even cross her mind.

Adoption is also a pro-life issue. We must get rid of the stigma that makes placing a child for adoption a shameful act. We need to teach our kids, from the time that they are children, that women who place their children for adoption are heroes. That they are able to unselfishly choose the best life for their child.
 
Leonardo Da Vinci was the sin of a salve girl. If you go back enough in time, one of your ancestors may have been the product of rape, hundreds of generations of human beings ago.
 
To help someone who survived rape to see that she can become an instrument of joy, to literally bring a blessing from the ashes, what a beautiful thing!
 
I don’t believe adoption is shameful, I think it is loving! Some women do not have enough support,it is only when that happens an abortion could be considered! Obviously, I hope a women with enough support should not have an abortion and AGAIN I am not saying is abortion is right. By the way I know rape is a pro-life issue.
 
My three year old child causes me great physical and emotional distress. He’s very willful and stubborn. My wife says she spotted a gray hair on my head because I’m always chasing after him. He has turned my life upside down. I didn’t know it would be this hard to raise a 3 year old!
It’s totally understandable if I put him down, right? After all, I’m the adult and he’s under developed… can’t even read yet!

Yes. It. Is. Exactly. 100%. Absolutely. The. Same.

How people can see the obvious horror of what I sarcastically wrote above but miss the equal horror of abortion is beyond me. No. Difference. Period.
 
Last edited:
Thanks 🙂
I thought “answer” meant we were supposed to finish the sentence;
"Women should be allowed to have an abortion because…[insert answer here]
 
I have appreciated the civil nature of the discourse. Refreshing. As far as I see it, once it is realized the unborn child is indeed a living human being, the case is closed. This does not mean that we don’t pour as many resources as we can into also caring for the emotional and/or physical needs of those struggling with an unwanted or unplanned pregnancy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top