Prominent Catholics call on pope to oust S.F. archbishop

  • Thread starter Thread starter saintjohnxxiii
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Keep in mind how AIDS are developed. Homosexuals experience pain not only from rejection from others. Anything violates God’s natural law brings severe consequence and pain. Like you said, the pain of the homosexuals are not only from rejection from others. Deep down they know they are in disorder, but they want the public to acknowledge this abnormal as normal. Like you said, this suffering hardens their heart and become self-righteousness. However, no matter how they want to twist the reality and no matter how the public twist the reality along with them - call a non-marriage marriage, call gay straight, deep down they know that is not true. That’s why their pain is endless. Even gay marriage will not release their pain.

Only turth can set us free. A human being needs to acknowledge truth and follow the truth to be happy and free. We can never call “black” “white” and pretend to be happy. Follow Christ’s teaching and strive for holiness according to the Scripture’s teaching is the only way to be free and happy. Therefore,“Sin No more!”!
[Emphasis added]

I don’t think that’s true. Deep down, to the best of their knowledge, heterosexual and homosexual feelings are equal.

If that wasn’t the case, there would be no basis for “discrimination”.

I know you mean well, but you have no idea what they’re feeling. Don’t presume to know what they understand, feel, or identify with.

It’s statements like these that make it hard to communicate with the LGBT community.
 
[Emphasis added]

I don’t think that’s true. Deep down, to the best of their knowledge, heterosexual and homosexual feelings are equal.

If that wasn’t the case, there would be no basis for “discrimination”.

I know you mean well, but you have no idea what they’re feeling. Don’t presume to know what they understand, feel, or identify with.

It’s statements like these that make it hard to communicate with the LGBT community.
Why is it that PTL has no idea what they feel and can’t presume to know, but you know exactly what they feel and can presume to explain it to us?

Natural law would seem to indicate that knowledge of the morality/immorality of hetero/homosexuality is available to everyone. The fact that many choose to ignore or intentionally flout natural law doesn’t mean they are fundamentally unaware of it.
 
I agree I don’t know how other people really feel. But I do know for sure God write on every human being’s heart about right and wrong. Various Bible passages talked about the grave evil of homosexuality. In other words, it is Scripture proven that homosexuality is a grave sin in God’s eyes. Unless you call the Scripture a lie and God a liar, you cannot deny that fact. God has written on every human being’s heart about what is evil and what is holy. That is why I said that deep down they know their behavior is not approved by God.
 
Why is it that PTL has no idea what they feel and can’t presume to know, but you know exactly what they feel and can presume to explain it to us?

Natural law would seem to indicate that knowledge of the morality/immorality of hetero/homosexuality is available to everyone. The fact that many choose to ignore or intentionally flout natural law doesn’t mean they are fundamentally unaware of it.
Because he does not.

And it’s based on speaking and interacting with them (who identify with the “gay lobby”).

They don’t see that SSA-based acts are morally different than heterosexual acts.

The fact that they should understand it doesn’t mean they do.

Blame clouding of judgment, mind, heart, whatever.

Do people who undergo in vitro fertilization intentionally flout natural law in their heart? No, they just want children.
 
I agree I don’t know how other people really feel. But I do know for sure God write on every human being’s heart about right and wrong. Various Bible passages talked about the grave evil of homosexuality. In other words, it is Scripture proven that homosexuality is a grave sin in God’s eyes. Unless you call the Scripture a lie and God a liar, you cannot deny that fact. God has written on every human being’s heart about what is evil and what is holy. That is why I said that deep down they know their behavior is not approved by God.
With the growing tide of atheism and agnosticism, God is probably not on their mind.

What I’m saying is, the “gay lobby” thinks they’re in the right, at least externally. They think they are being denied something. What they believe “deep in their hearts”, I can’t speculate.

And even for Christians, various groups tout…alternative…interpretation of Biblical verses and for whatever reason, some/a lot of people buy into that.

[Sorry I was uncharitable in my previous post. I sometimes take this issue personally, even though my previous experience with conservative Christian fora told me I should probably just stay quiet. And I wasn’t in a right state of mind. I’ve been part of/around gay secular groups and Christian groups that support homosexual acts as being equal in the eyes of God (I don’t believe them anymore as I reject them). They really do think God is on their side.]
 
Your comment would seem to suggest that there is some sort of middle ground upon which the Church has been willing to meet in the spirit of tolerance and understanding but that the gay community has completely rejected. So I’m curious as to what you see as this middle ground. What is the reasonable compromise that gay people should be willing to accept in the spirit of tolerance and understanding?
Tolerance and understanding as it is spoken of today usually promotes the regression of doctrine; a softening in the attitude toward moral degeneration. This is false and harmful to society. My understanding of pastoral is a reaching out in mercy to attempt to minister by means of rightly instructing, admonishing and counseling those in grave danger. It is a charitable endeavor which considers humanity first with the promise of the greatest possible ends. This is how the Church has always acted. The bishops have continually exhorted the faithful to respect homosexuals and have gone even further to accomplish this by defining the human person as they truly are as creatures of God. They warn and exhort that persons should not be defined by their sexual attractions alone, but by their total being. Now granted, the homosexuals who would persist in their own ways are opposed to this approach. They define tolerance and a “welcoming “into the Church by expecting a capitulation. While encouragement of repentance is truly extended which leads to mercy and fullness of life, those not willing to give up sinful lifestyles cry out that the Church is the one intolerant by not rationalizing sin.
 
With the growing tide of atheism and agnosticism, God is probably not on their mind.
While this is probably true, it is equally true that the Church cannot deviate from the commission she received from Christ. * “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, to the close of the age.”

(Mt 28:18-20)*
 
With the growing tide of atheism and agnosticism, God is probably not on their mind.

What I’m saying is, the “gay lobby” thinks they’re in the right, at least externally. They think they are being denied something. What they believe “deep in their hearts”, I can’t speculate.

And even for Christians, various groups tout…alternative…interpretation of Biblical verses and for whatever reason, some/a lot of people buy into that.

[Sorry I was uncharitable in my previous post. I sometimes take this issue personally, even though my previous experience with conservative Christian fora told me I should probably just stay quiet. And I wasn’t in a right state of mind. I’ve been part of/around gay secular groups and Christian groups that support homosexual acts as being equal in the eyes of God (I don’t believe them anymore as I reject them). They really do think God is on their side.]
I’m not sure exactly what you’re saying here. Obviously the LGBT community believes their own opinions are right. I think PTL’s original point was that people in this situation, at some level, maybe even unconsciously, can have a sense of something being wrong, or at least a questioning. I think this is probably true.

Just as it would be wrong to assume that an active homosexual person is fully aware of the immorality of their actions, it would also be wrong, IMO, to assume that the person is always perfectly at peace with their situation.
 
I’m not sure exactly what you’re saying here. Obviously the LGBT community believes their own opinions are right. I think PTL’s original point was that people in this situation, at some level, maybe even unconsciously, can have a sense of something being wrong, or at least a questioning. I think this is probably true.

Of course they can. But either through willful ignorance, being taught incorrectly, or having a clouded judgment, many do not.

The original post generalized all homosexuals as “deep down” sensing something wrong. Many don’t believe in absolute morality, and that goes for heterosexuals, too. Many have been ingrained with the idea that homosexuality is just a natural variation of human nature and that everything is a-ok.

Just as it would be wrong to assume that an active homosexual person is fully aware of the immorality of their actions, it would also be wrong, IMO, to assume that the person is always perfectly at peace with their situation.

I don’t think we fundamentally disagree. We were just being cautious about the opposite ends of the scenario. 🙂
 
While this is probably true, it is equally true that the Church cannot deviate from the commission she received from Christ. * “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, to the close of the age.”

(Mt 28:18-20)*
Oh, of course not.

I was just commenting on the fact that their lack of belief in any “higher power” can limit their acceptance of certain moral laws. The “If no one is hurt, what’s the big deal?” type of thing.
 
Oh, of course not.

I was just commenting on the fact that their lack of belief in any “higher power” can limit their acceptance of certain moral laws. The “If no one is hurt, what’s the big deal?” type of thing.
The problem is people do get hurt, starting with themselves going outward…kind of like an oil spill…😉 It is not starting from without, but within. I do think we all have our own sins, or oil spills if you like, straight or gay. Anytime you come across real hatred, anger, etc. It amazes me how little people see the harm from sin in themselves: discomfort, depression, anger, self-righteousness, self-disgust, lack of peace. People carry this stuff around 24/7; it defines them in time. We can’t figure out where our unhappiness comes from; must be what others to do us, right? Thank God there is redemption.
 
Not to continue too much with the off-topic comments, but I think this video is relevant. 🙂

Signed both places. The Church needs more people like this, who aren’t afraid to water down or distort the truth.
 
Tolerance and understanding as it is spoken of today usually promotes the regression of doctrine; a softening in the attitude toward moral degeneration. This is false and harmful to society. My understanding of pastoral is a reaching out in mercy to attempt to minister by means of rightly instructing, admonishing and counseling those in grave danger. It is a charitable endeavor which considers humanity first with the promise of the greatest possible ends. This is how the Church has always acted. The bishops have continually exhorted the faithful to respect homosexuals and have gone even further to accomplish this by defining the human person as they truly are as creatures of God. They warn and exhort that persons should not be defined by their sexual attractions alone, but by their total being. Now granted, the homosexuals who would persist in their own ways are opposed to this approach. They define tolerance and a “welcoming “into the Church by expecting a capitulation. While encouragement of repentance is truly extended which leads to mercy and fullness of life, those not willing to give up sinful lifestyles cry out that the Church is the one intolerant by not rationalizing sin.
Well said.
,
 
Not to continue too much with the off-topic comments, but I think this video is relevant. 🙂

Signed both places. The Church needs more people like this, who aren’t afraid to water down or distort the truth.
This is a long video. If you fast forwarded to the later part, you will see the gay people’s courageous testimonies of living in chastity. Every one is called for chastity, straight or gay. Like one person who has same sex attraction said - people can have lot of sex but no intimacy or they can have deep intimacy but no sex. That is a very true statement.

For gay Christians, Catholics or Protestants, one major problem is they forget the teaching of picking up and carrying their cross - the bottom line of the Christian faith. They focus on satisfying their lust - have same sex relationship, and forget about chastity, sacrifice, and following Christ’s teaching.

The road of chastity, sacrifice, self-control, and carrying our own cross is a narrow road to salvation. The road of indulging our physical desires, satisfying our lust, and do whatever we feel like is a broad way to destruction. Most people are walking on the road of destruction. That’s what the Bible said. Very few people find the narrow way.

What we choose in this life decides our eternal fate. Eternity seems far away. Most people don’t think about it. But everyone will die and eternity is real. The gays can satisfy their lust in this life and spend eternity in hell. But if we have true compassion toward them, we would not want them to suffer eternally. Advocating the lifestyle of chastity for gays is not hatred but deep love. No matter how the gay society try to justify their behavior, or call gay relationship as “marriage”, no one can justify himself in front of God’s judgment seat.
 
This is a long video. If you fast forwarded to the later part, you will see the gay people’s courageous testimonies of living in chastity. Every one is called for chastity, straight or gay. Like one person who has same sex attraction said - people can have lot of sex but no intimacy or they can have deep intimacy but no sex. That is a very true statement.

For gay Christians, Catholics or Protestants, one major problem is they forget the teaching of picking up and carrying their cross - the bottom line of the Christian faith. They focus on satisfying their lust - have same sex relationship, and forget about chastity, sacrifice, and following Christ’s teaching.

The road of chastity, sacrifice, self-control, and carrying our own cross is a narrow road to salvation. The road of indulging our physical desires, satisfying our lust, and do whatever we feel like is a broad way to destruction. Most people are walking on the road of destruction. That’s what the Bible said. Very few people find the narrow way.

What we choose in this life decides our eternal fate. Eternity seems far away. Most people don’t think about it. But everyone will die and eternity is real. The gays can satisfy their lust in this life and spend eternity in hell. But if we have true compassion toward them, we would not want them to suffer eternally. Advocating the lifestyle of chastity for gays is not hatred but deep love. No matter how the gay society try to justify their behavior, or call gay relationship as “marriage”, no one can justify himself in front of God’s judgment seat.
👍👍👍
 
Tolerance and understanding as it is spoken of today usually promotes the regression of doctrine; a softening in the attitude toward moral degeneration. This is false and harmful to society. My understanding of pastoral is a reaching out in mercy to attempt to minister by means of rightly instructing, admonishing and counseling those in grave danger. It is a charitable endeavor which considers humanity first with the promise of the greatest possible ends. This is how the Church has always acted. The bishops have continually exhorted the faithful to respect homosexuals and have gone even further to accomplish this by defining the human person as they truly are as creatures of God. They warn and exhort that persons should not be defined by their sexual attractions alone, but by their total being. Now granted, the homosexuals who would persist in their own ways are opposed to this approach. They define tolerance and a “welcoming “into the Church by expecting a capitulation. While encouragement of repentance is truly extended which leads to mercy and fullness of life, those not willing to give up sinful lifestyles cry out that the Church is the one intolerant by not rationalizing sin.
Well said.
,
Seconded!

Peace, Mark
 
SanFran Archbishop weighs 'adjustments" to teacher contracts

Fr John Piderit:
The goal, he continued, was to make them “more pastorally approachable, without changing the main point of the statements."
“The archbishop has met with [the committee of teachers of religion] and he likes what they are doing. That effort is underway.”
ncregister.com/blog/joan-desmond/sanfran-archbishop-willing-to-make-adjustments-to-secure-teachers-rights

I hope the core of the contract remains.
 
This Q&A from the diocese addresses pretty much every complaint about the morality statement teachers are required to sign
catholic-sf.org/ns.php?newsid=25&id=63174

I think this sums it up pretty well:

Q: Will Teachers be required to sign an “oath” or “affirmation” of religious belief as part of this collective bargaining agreement?

A: No. the Archdiocese has no intention of “rooting out” those who are not Catholic or those who do not assent completely to Catholic teaching. The Archdiocese and the schools stand for the teachings of the Catholic Church in their entirety, and the handbook for each of our high schools will contain a statement affirming certain key facets of these teachings. But these statements are of the school as an institution, not of the individual teachers. On the contrary, the statement specifically acknowledges that not all of our teachers will agree with everything the Catholic Church teaches. - See more at: catholic-sf.org/ns.php?newsid=25&id=63174#.dpuf
 
Fellow Catholics, note the coming together of evil and the crowd crying for “tolerance” in efforts to destroy authentic Catholic culture.

Who is Paying Sam Singer?

Sam Singer urinated on the carpet of his partner in a public relations firm because of an argument, or so people say. Singer denies it and says he poured beer onto the carpet to trick his partner. He explains: “This goes to my belief that a good mind f* is as good as the real thing.”** …
 
I don’t know if anyone has pointed out this link to the new blog yet. It seems to be written by a local (SF Archdiocese) homeschooling mom:

onemadmomblog.wordpress.com

She seems to be quite familiar with what’s going on with the archbishop and the schools and explains it in an entertaining way!

The story has not ended. Be prepared for more…but we know who wins in the end.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top