Prominent converts to Catholicism

  • Thread starter Thread starter Al_Masetti
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Does anybody know how to identify who the rabbi was who converted at or shortly after the end of WWII in Rome?🤷
I think you are looking for Rabbi Israel Zolli, who took the name Eugenio at his baptism, out of respect for Pope Pius XII [Eugenio Paccelli] He was Chief Rabbi of Rome during WWII and was converted by the example of Pope Pius XII’s protection of the Jews during that time.

I think that Google will give you any information that you want.
 
I think you are looking for Rabbi Israel Zolli, who took the name Eugenio at his baptism, out of respect for Pope Pius XII [Eugenio Paccelli] He was Chief Rabbi of Rome during WWII and was converted by the example of Pope Pius XII’s protection of the Jews during that time.

I think that Google will give you any information that you want.
🙂 Thanks, Joe, for the timely response! It seems the media would have the RC church as having collaborating with Nazi Germany to oppress Jews, but this helps show the opposite. Along a bit of a different tack, the media seems to wilfully ignore Benjamin Bannecker’s accomplishments and role in the design, architecture and construction of the city of Washington, D.C., while favoring L’Enfant.:mad: 🙂 Colmcille
 
Even further back. St. Paul:thumbsup:
Sorry, but Paul remained a Torah observant Jew throughout his life: taking Nazirite vows, going up to Jerusalem each year to observe the three annual feasts where it was necessary for observant Jews to be in Jerusalem for these feasts. When confronted at the Temple in Jerusalem for teaching Jews to abandon the Torah, Paul defended that he had not done so.

Paul, after accepting Yeshua as the Messiah, didn’t keep Torah for salvation though. And the Judaism Paul observed was vastly different from the Rabbinic Judaism many Jews observe today which is Torah plus endless “oral traditions” added on. Paul wasn’t concerned about those, nor should we be concerned about “traditions” outside of Sacred Scripture.
 
Sorry, but Paul remained a Torah observant Jew throughout his life: taking Nazirite vows, going up to Jerusalem each year to observe the three annual feasts where it was necessary for observant Jews to be in Jerusalem for these feasts. When confronted at the Temple in Jerusalem for teaching Jews to abandon the Torah, Paul defended that he had not done so.

Paul, after accepting Yeshua as the Messiah, didn’t keep Torah for salvation though. And the Judaism Paul observed was vastly different from the Rabbinic Judaism many Jews observe today which is Torah plus endless “oral traditions” added on. Paul wasn’t concerned about those, nor should we be concerned about “traditions” outside of Sacred Scripture.
…ok… anyway…

How about even FURTHER back?

The original 12. 😃
 
Sorry, but Paul remained a Torah observant Jew throughout his life: taking Nazirite vows, going up to Jerusalem each year to observe the three annual feasts where it was necessary for observant Jews to be in Jerusalem for these feasts. When confronted at the Temple in Jerusalem for teaching Jews to abandon the Torah, Paul defended that he had not done so.

Paul, after accepting Yeshua as the Messiah, didn’t keep Torah for salvation though. And the Judaism Paul observed was vastly different from the Rabbinic Judaism many Jews observe today which is Torah plus endless “oral traditions” added on. Paul wasn’t concerned about those, nor should we be concerned about “traditions” outside of Sacred Scripture.
Ha, the amount of evidence to disprove you is so enormous, I’m seriously thinking you didn’t do any research on this matter. Google please.

Here is a simple disproof of your initial premise:

"Paul remained a Torah observant Jew throughout his life: " - Incorrect, if this was true then he wouldn’t have said in his letters that not circumsizing is OK. Torah observant Jews wouldn’t say that.
“Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but what matters is the keeping of the commandments of God.” 1 Corinthians 7:19 - Commandments of what now? The commandments of Jesus. Since he now decrees that circumsion is not required anymore, it obviously indicates the old covenant regarding the mosaic law is no more.

Him observing Jewish festivals doesn’t disprove anything, even Jesus did it, because it was what? Repeat after me, TRADITIONAL, there was nothing wrong with observing traditions, you have just disproved yourself.

I am Catholic, but my native country is Sri Lanka, I observe a lot of the cultural festivals and traditions as they don’t contradict my faith, Sri Lanka is a buddhist country.

I’m not going to bother with the rest when you can’t get simple little things correct. Correct your first statement then we can deal with the rest.
 
Paul, after accepting Yeshua as the Messiah, didn’t keep Torah for salvation though. And the Judaism Paul observed was vastly different from the Rabbinic Judaism many Jews observe today which is Torah plus endless “oral traditions” added on. Paul wasn’t concerned about those, nor should we be concerned about “traditions” outside of Sacred Scripture.

Paul was a Pharisee, the inmediate forerunners of Rabbinical Judaism.
And Pharisees were accused of putting walls around the Torah and putting oral tradition above the Torah even before Jesus times as the Dead Sea Scroll’s have proven.
You are free to believe what you want but not to make your own facts.
 
I don’t believe the Wayne story is confirmed. Just rumored. Anyone, correct me if I am wrong.
I think John Wayne was always Catholic:
nndb.com/people/605/000023536/

Other converts:
  • Salvador Dali converted to Catholicism.
  • Oscar Wilde is a deathbed convert from Anglican to Catholicism
  • Gary Cooper
  • Arlo Guthrie
  • Roman Polanski converted from Judaism to Catholicism when he was a child and was a devoted Catholic for a time but lost faith after the death of Sharon Tate
 
Ha, the amount of evidence to disprove you is so enormous, I’m seriously thinking you didn’t do any research on this matter. Google please.

Here is a simple disproof of your initial premise:

"Paul remained a Torah observant Jew throughout his life: " - Incorrect, if this was true then he wouldn’t have said in his letters that not circumsizing is OK. Torah observant Jews wouldn’t say that.
“Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but what matters is the keeping of the commandments of God.” 1 Corinthians 7:19 - Commandments of what now? The commandments of Jesus. Since he now decrees that circumsion is not required anymore, it obviously indicates the old covenant regarding the mosaic law is no more.

Him observing Jewish festivals doesn’t disprove anything, even Jesus did it, because it was what? Repeat after me, TRADITIONAL, there was nothing wrong with observing traditions, you have just disproved yourself.

I am Catholic, but my native country is Sri Lanka, I observe a lot of the cultural festivals and traditions as they don’t contradict my faith, Sri Lanka is a buddhist country.

I’m not going to bother with the rest when you can’t get simple little things correct. Correct your first statement then we can deal with the rest.
Good heavens, Paul criticised Peter for refusing to eat with Gentiles. Sounds like the opposite of someone who is fastidious about keeping Torah, no?
 
John Wayne’s wife and children were catholic. His son has reported that he converted on his deathbed.

I am surprised no one has proclaimed J. R.R. Tolkein!
 
John Wayne’s wife and children were catholic. His son has reported that he converted on his deathbed.

I am surprised no one has proclaimed J. R.R. Tolkein!
But wasn’t J.R.R. Tolkein always Catholic? His mom was a convert, I believe, and from what I understand, J.R.R. considered her a martyr to the Faith, as she was abandoned by her family when she became Catholic, and subsequently died from (I think) diabetes with no aid from them whatsoever.
 
Patricia Heaton who played Debra Barone on Everybody Loves Raymond was a Roman Catholic(her sister is a nun) who once said “once a Catholic, always a Catholic”. Now she converted and is a Presbyterian:(
 
Malcolm Muggeridge, perhaps England’s most famous agnostic back in the day, found his way into the Catholic Church. He ended up being one of the church’s greatest defenders and media commentators.
 
Ha, the amount of evidence to disprove you is so enormous, I’m seriously thinking you didn’t do any research on this matter. Google please.

Here is a simple disproof of your initial premise:

"Paul remained a Torah observant Jew throughout his life: " - Incorrect, if this was true then he wouldn’t have said in his letters that not circumsizing is OK. Torah observant Jews wouldn’t say that.
“Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but what matters is the keeping of the commandments of God.” 1 Corinthians 7:19 - Commandments of what now? The commandments of Jesus. Since he now decrees that circumsion is not required anymore, it obviously indicates the old covenant regarding the mosaic law is no more.

Him observing Jewish festivals doesn’t disprove anything, even Jesus did it, because it was what? Repeat after me, TRADITIONAL, there was nothing wrong with observing traditions, you have just disproved yourself.

I am Catholic, but my native country is Sri Lanka, I observe a lot of the cultural festivals and traditions as they don’t contradict my faith, Sri Lanka is a buddhist country.

I’m not going to bother with the rest when you can’t get simple little things correct. Correct your first statement then we can deal with the rest.
I’ll go you one better than Google. The Holy Bible.
  1. Paul identified himself as a Jew even to his dying day. In Acts 23:6 he said: “I am (not “was”) a Pharisee.” He even declared that his observance of the Torah was “blameless,” which indicates he observed a Jewish lifestyle to the very end. (Philippians 3:6). Paul testified that he had kept the Torah throughout his life. (Acts 25:7-8 and Acts 28:17)
  2. Paul circumcised Timothy, the son of a Jewish mother and Greek father. Paul considered Timothy to be Jewish and wanted him to be circumcised before taking him on a mission trip to assist with a ministry to the Jews. (Acts 16:1-3)
  3. Paul regularly attended synagogue.“When they had passed through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where there was a Jewish synagogue. As his custom was, Paul went into the synagogue, and on three Sabbath days he reasoned with them from the Scriptures.” Acts 17:1-2
  4. Paul went to Jerusalem to keep the “feast” (probably Passover) at the end of his second missionary journey. (Acts 18:21-22 and
    1 Cor 5:7)
  5. Paul took a Nazirite vow (Acts 18:18 and see Numbers 6:2-6, 13-18)
  6. Paul sailed away from Philippi “after the days of Unleavened Bread” (Acts 20:6), indicating that he observed Passover and the Days of Unleavened Bread with the church at Philippi (1 Cor. 5:7)
  7. After leaving Philippi,he sailed along the coast of Asia Minor but skipped Ephesus because he wanted to be in Jerusalem for the Feast of Pentecost (Shavu’ot) (Acts 20:16). This was the end of his third missionary journey.
  8. Paul lived in “observance of the Torah” (Acts 21:23-24) and offered sacrifices in the Jewish Temple (Acts 21:26). Notice that Paul was not only willing to pay for his own sacrifices in order to be released at the end of the Nazirite vow, but paying also for the those sacrifices of four other Jewish brothers! **Notice that he did this at the express with of James, the head of the Jerusalem church! **
  9. Paul’s disagreement with Peter in which he rebuked Peter (Galatians 2:11-14) had to do with the requirements of Gentiles and whether they had to convert to Judaism to become Christians, NOT about the lifestyle of Jewish believers.
  10. Paul noticed that the prison ship (upon which he was sailing to Rome) was going too slowly and that “the fast was now already past” (Acts 27:9). The “fast” he is referring to is Yom Kippur.
Paul’s comments about “circumcision being nothing” did NOT mean that he was repudiating any observance of circumcision. But rather the observance of it as some sort of merit system to gain entrance into God’s favor or heaven. The Jews had come to believe that since they were circumcised as sons of Abraham that they were “in like Flynn.” Paul was arguing against it as a false security, not repudiating Judaism (in it’s pure form)

There is something VERY wrong in observing traditions if by them you think you merit some sort of “brownie point” system before the Lord.
 
…ok… anyway…

How about even FURTHER back?

The original 12. 😃
Ok, let’s look at the original 12. Jewish…every single one of them. Peter’s sermon on the day of Pentecost was given from the steps of the Temple and it was thoroughly Jewish. He quoted copiously from the Hebrew Scriptures which would’ve meant little to any Gentiles in earshot (if there were any as Pentecost/Shavu’ot is a Jewish festival). It is probable that all 3,000 converts on the Day of Pentecost were all Jews (Acts 2:1-41).

The earliest members of this new Jewish sect were all Jewish and met regularly in the Temple, were Gentiles were explicity excluded (Acts 2:46).

The apostles Peter and John are recorded as having gone regularly to the Temple for the afternoon prayers and sacrifices (Acts 3:1).

The ministry of the apostles continued almost exclusively among the Jews, among whom were thousands who believed in Yeshua and were “zealous for the law/ Torah” (Acts 21:20)

After they were imprisoned and miraculously escaped, the angel told them to go and stand in the Temple and speak to the people the words of life. (Acts 5:20)

When Stephen was called before the High Priest and Sanhedrin, he gave a defense that was thoroughly Jewish encompassing the entire history of Israel before being martyred (Acts 7)

Even Peter’s vision to visit Cornelius a “God fearer” (ger tzeddek) meant that according to Jewish terms Cornelius visited the synagogue and observed Jewish customs and traditions (Acts 10).

Peter was uncomfortable about eating the “unkosher” animals in the vision and was uncomfortable about entering the house of a non-Jew. This indicates that Peter was still very Torah observant even after 3 years of being with Jesus.

Let’s stop imposing upon the Apostles beliefs that they didn’t hold nor were even introduced until 300-400 years after them. Beliefs I doubt they would even hold today.
 
Let’s stop imposing upon the Apostles beliefs that they didn’t hold nor were even introduced until 300-400 years after them. Beliefs I doubt they would even hold today.
Well, do you remember that the apostles has disciples?
Do you realize that many their writtings are available today?

Or you believe that Constantine/trail of blood lies?
The beliefs of the Early Christian are very well documented.
And the Dead Sea Scrolls have shown us the Jewish origin of most of them. And the Didache have been found with fragments in Hebrew. Paul was a Pharisee, but not the others, and the seconf generation had many non Jews like Sirians and Greeks.
Now how is inventing history?
Paul started as a Pharisee, but quoting the Act in a out of order way do not account that people do change over time. Even Biblical concepts.
 
BTW Pharisees do not believe in Sola Scriptura.
Neither the Early Christians.
That was a recent Protestant invention.👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top