W
Webo
Guest
I think Hodos explained that the word of God is his authority. He also offered a couple times to do a Bible study with some of you. Take him up on his offer.
The Trinity is a novelty to the reformers? Interesting.
Yes, this is novel to the early Reformers.In other words it varies because there is no solid scriptural evidence for the Marian dogmas, which is why we are not dogmatic about it.
Protestantism itself is barely able to be defined
As is demonstrable, you were the one initiating the ad hominem attacks. The thread was asking what Protestants believe about Mary and why. I provided a response to the original post. You may disagree, which is fine, as I have already defined this as a matter of adiaphora. If you can’t contribute to the conversation in a meaningful way except to lob grenades and see what sticks, then kindly find a new forum thread.They appeal to rebellious human egos and lead/incite them to degrade her for them.
Prepare yourself for a vicious ad hominem attack.
There is no universal Protestant teaching about Mary, as Protestantism really isn’t an “ism”. It describes a large varied group of folks with different attitudes and opinions.… I know I may be opening up an endless conversation, but what is the Protestant teaching of Mary?
examples
The Word of God is a Person Who sent a select few men and their successors to teach everything He commanded them by word and deed. If @Hodos is one of those successors in communion with Saint Peter, then he has authority. Claiming Scripture as your authority is analogous to Satan quoting Scripture to Our Lord.I think Hodos explained that the word of God is his authority. He also offered a couple times to do a Bible study with some of you. Take him up on his offer.
Given how you completely just misused that scripture reference, you obviously haven’t studied that passage well. Satan’s issue wasn’t quoting scripture. It was misquoting it out of context. If you observe Jesus response it was to quote scripture to Satan putting it back into context. See the list of supposed prooftexts offered as another example of misuse.Claiming Scripture as your authority is analogous to Satan quoting Scripture to Our Lord
Yes, exactly! That is exactly my point. If you quote Scripture out of context, your only ‘authority’ is using the ‘Word of God’ as a pretext; hence sola scriptura.AugustTherese:![]()
Given how you completely just misused that scripture reference, you obviously haven’t studied that passage well. Satan’s issue wasn’t quoting scripture. It was misquoting it out of context. If you observe Jesus response it was to quote scripture to Satan putting it back into context. See the list of supposed prooftexts offered as another example of misuse.Claiming Scripture as your authority is analogous to Satan quoting Scripture to Our Lord
But - and this is crucial! The reform was not to reform the hierarchy - it was to radically change Christianity into something that Christ never taught. It was driven by the mental instability of the primary reformer. Yet, even he, in his marginal sanity, revered Mary and did not degrade her memory.Martin Luther had a point. Our Catholic leaders were corrupt.
“Bible Christianity” or fundamentalism, is predominately an American phenomenon. And America is known for massive egos.From the arrogance and massive egos that are attracted to bible Christianity, you can judge the reformation by its fruits.
Even worse, it is the ego that interprets. That is patently obvious in the arrogance and condescension we observe here - the arrogance which purports to teach the very Church which gave them the bible they distort.Every heresy has originated from a misinterpretation of Scripture; every heretic claims Scripture as his authority attempting to usurp the authority of the Church. What do you think was Arius, Nestorius, and Martin Luther’s authority for their doctrines? Scripture!
Apparently this passage from Holy Writ does not apply to them.2 Peter 3:15-16
And count the forbearance of our Lord as salvation. So also our beloved
brother Paul wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, speaking of this
as he does in all his letters. There are some things in them hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other scriptures.
Not a peep from Christ about running to the bible for your slice of truth.Luke 10:16.
“He who hears you hears me, and he who rejects you rejects me, and he who rejects me rejects him who sent me.”
To be completely charitable: “Well DUH!”So to worship Mary is a sin.
Besides, bear in mind that Timothy was himself a bishop, and the context of both letters from Paul is in how to lead his flock. Timothy needed to bear the Scripture in mind and build others, many of whom were illiterate, up using it. It would not have been taken as each individual needing to read for themselves and interpret for themselves. Many, if not most, were completely incapable of doing so.But here some one perhaps will ask, Since the canon of Scripture is complete, and sufficient of itself for everything, and more than sufficient, what need is there to join with it the authority of the Church’s interpretation? For this reason — because, owing to the depth of Holy Scripture, all do not accept it in one and the same sense, but one understands its words in one way, another in another; so that it seems to be capable of as many interpretations as there are interpreters. For Novatian expounds it one way, Sabellius another, Donatus another, Arius, Eunomius, Macedonius, another, Photinus, Apollinaris, Priscillian, another, Iovinian, Pelagius, Celestius, another, lastly, Nestorius another. Therefore, it is very necessary, on account of so great intricacies of such various error, that the rule for the right understanding of the prophets and apostles should be framed in accordance with the standard of Ecclesiastical and Catholic interpretation.