P
PRmerger
Guest
Interesting!In the East, she is said not only to be above all humanity, but above all creation.
Interesting!In the East, she is said not only to be above all humanity, but above all creation.
So do you believe that Mary was not the spouse of St. Joseph? Remember, the Orthodox believe that she did not engage in marital relations with him.First, I’ve already debunked the “spouse of the Holy Spirit” claim, please read above.
Then you would have to claim that Adam and Eve were also not human, since they, too, were conceived without original sin.Second, Mary bearing God in her womb does not change her humanity. Being the IC does.
Her Holy Soul ascended first then the (physical?) glorified body after, and not together?“And an anticipation of the resurrection of other Christians”
Maximus the Confessor- She ascended to Heaven by the Grace and assistance of Her Son before the general resurrection to draw our attention to the coming resurrection. She was assumed completely, but first Her Holy Soul. (Live of the Virgin PG-153)
The confusion is, “Well, what’s the actual practical difference between latria and hyperdulia?” Yes, there are terms to differentiate the two, but how does one practice latria and how does one practice hyperdulia?Coming to this page, Constantine, and with your past comments, I am questioning just how much Orthodox think like you.
Last year I served a Greek Orthodox widow in her home. It was filled with icons of Mary Theotokos. I revealed to them I was Catholic and greatly enjoyed their presence. They told me it gives them such a sense of motherly protection, especially with father now deceased.
The next day worker came in and I asked her what she thought of the icons. She responded that she was a Christian. I asked why that?..and she said she goes to her Christian church and they do not worship Mary. I told her I was Catholic and that we do not worship Mary, and that I am a Christian and implied these Greek Orthodox were as well.
That was it, but I sometimes want to let such Protestants know they should look for another ecclesial community.
:hug1:PRMerger, I shared with my sister your analogy of the soiled plastic bottle to represent womanhood vs the Holy Virgin. We were going to Mass to meet our new archbishop. We talked about how one sin can do a big mess to our soul and personality, just like the old oil did to the once clean bottle.
I like your other comments here on this page, too.
Are you kidding me? Is not the Church the spouse of Christ? Do you think that in any way has a sexual connotation? Who is the Father of Jesus? Who is the mother of Jesus? Of course God did not have sexual relations with Mary and I have just shown you that a spousal relationship does not have to mean a sexual relationship. But when you are the father, I guarantee you that you have a spousal relationship with the mother.What else does being the spouse of one means? The whole reason that you call Mary as the spouse of the Holy Spirit is because it is by the power of the Holy Spirit that Mary conceived, correct? Then it means that you believe this “power” is spousal, and what else is that if not sex? Can’t we just believe that God can make a woman pregnant without taking her for His wife?
Steve, is this not a Mormon theological thought?No Catholic believes that God had sexual relations with Mary so to imply that we do is just not being honest.
Spouse is a wife, what other meaning is there. To say that the action of the Holy Spirit in conceiving Jesus in the womb of Mary is spousal is to make the act sexual. There is no other way around that. I mean, if it is not sexual, then why insist that Mary is the spouse of the Holy Spirit? This claim is piety gone wrong.You and I do not believe the only way God could impregnate Mary was via sex? Scripture said God did it via the HS. Your hang up is the word spouse.
What it means is what was said to Joseph.
If we want to ignore the words of scripture which clearly define the HSs role then yes we can just believe that God can make a woman pregnant without taking her for His wife.
You are taking the word spouse, to mean wife, way too literal. OK forget the word spouse. What other person is the daughter of the Father, impregnated by God via the Holy Spirit via supernatural means, and the mother of the Son? What other person had that kind of relationship with the holy Trinity? None. That is pretty awesome…![]()
Elijah was treated differently as well. The problem with the IC is about the humanity of Mary in contrast to the rest of us. Of course everyone gets something unique, but that doesn’t make us a different human from the rest. The IC does.Phorus is to carry of bring, generally, but tokus is about bringing forth through birth. And yes only one, unique person did this.
Perhaps, nevertheless she was treated in a unique manner, different from the rest of humanity.
This “dilemma” is only present in the minds of some of our Catholic friends in these threads that have grown fond of perpetrating this false dilemma.Protestants are really stuck with a dilemma:
- They accept the authority and infallibility of the Catholic Church to determine the books that are in their bible…
- But they believe that same Church errors on faith and morals.
How about you…are you the one to declare what is in error and what is not?This “dilemma” is only present in the minds of some of our Catholic friends in these threads that have grown fond of perpetrating this false dilemma.
Since one must assume A to be true to posit B, this is an error of false presumption.
I do not accept the authority and infallibility of the Catholic Church in determining Canon. Fact is I categorically reject any claim to authority and infallibility that the Catholic Church makes for itself.
And yes, I do believe the Catholic Church errors on faith and morals - which is one of many reasons I am not Catholic.
Again, OK forget the word spouse. What other person is the daughter of the Father, impregnated by God via the Holy Spirit via supernatural means, and the mother of the Son? What other person had that kind of relationship with the holy Trinity? You find nothing unique about that relationship?Spouse is a wife, what other meaning is there. To say that the action of the Holy Spirit in conceiving Jesus in the womb of Mary is spousal is to make the act sexual. There is no other way around that. I mean, if it is not sexual, then why insist that Mary is the spouse of the Holy Spirit? This claim is piety gone wrong.
Who determined the canon? Let’s leave the Catholic Church and every other non-Catholic Church out of the discussion. Please be specific.This “dilemma” is only present in the minds of some of our Catholic friends in these threads that have grown fond of perpetrating this false dilemma.
Since one must assume A to be true to posit B, this is an error of false presumption.
I do not accept the authority and infallibility of the Catholic Church in determining Canon. Fact is I categorically reject any claim to authority and infallibility that the Catholic Church makes for itself.
And yes, I do believe the Catholic Church errors on faith and morals - which is one of many reasons I am not Catholic.
Really, it is her being Theotokos that makes her different than the rest. Bishop Dimitri, the last OCA Bishop of the South basically said that if you don;t get that, you don’t get the mystery of the incarnation.The problem with the IC is about the humanity of Mary in contrast to the rest of us. Of course everyone gets something unique, but that doesn’t make us a different human from the rest. The IC does.
The error of your analogy lies in the fact that I’m not free to believe the above to be true because the voice of* The Most High God* has proclaimed them false.Right. We are not free to believe that she sinned.
Just as you are not free to believe
-that there are many gods
-that God is 4 persons in one
-that Mary was not a virgin
-that Jesus stayed dead
etc etc etc