Protestants and alcohol

  • Thread starter Thread starter JamesCollins
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don’the find it much of a reach to believe “new wine” is grape juice. I do not think it is definitive at all.
Except that the grape harvest is in late summer. By the time the Passover came in the spring, there were no fresh grapes to turn into juice.

Without refrigeration, grape juice ferments.
 
Except that the grape harvest is in late summer. By the time the Passover came in the spring, there were no fresh grapes to turn into juice.

Without refrigeration, grape juice ferments.
Except that the article I mentioned earlier shows that ancients had a way of preserving grapes so they could be using freshly squeezed unfermented grape juice up to a year after the harvest.
 
The law is not a determinant here. You keep on stressing “of age.” What has that got to do with anything? There are many reasons why no church should provide alcohol on its premises, the first being in 1 Cor 11:28-34

“And if any man hunger, let him eat at home; that ye come not together unto condemnation. And the rest will I set in order when I come.”

The second being that drivers should not be drinking alcohol at all, optimally.

The third being that if you can’t do without alcohol, you’ve got a problem, whether personally or as a church.

The fourth being, it sets a bad example to everyone else and encourages casual drinking.

The fifth being, it is scandalous for single women on their own to be offered alcoholic drink by persons to whom they are not related or who are their guardians.

The sixth being that the church has got better things to do with its money than buy alcohol.

The seventh being that there is no reason to drink alcohol on church premises, and what is not from faith, is sin.
Can you please elaborate on the fifth pont? As a single woman on my own, who is supposed to be my guardian? Are women perpetual minors to you?

What exactly is scandalous about being offered an alcoholic drink? I remembered being offered a beer during my last church function. I accepted said drink. Did I sin?
 
christianitytoday.com/ct/2014/june/why-i-gave-up-alcohol.html?share=ciOq+4zux%2FoW6jM1IaARvSkNOZEyPE3+&paging=off#bmb=1

This is a link to a recent article in Christianity Today (May 22, 2014). I’m going to start another thread with this article as the OP. I think the thread needs to be posted in the Social Justice section of CAF, so if you’re interested, slide on over there.

The key statement in the article is “I didn’t give up alcohol because I wanted to flee the evils of the world. I gave up alcohol as a way of engaging the evils of the world.”

The young author of this article brought out several points that I have made in this thread, mainly that Christians are taught by Jesus to look out for our weaker brothers and sisters.

Please read this article. It’s well-written by someone who is obviously not an anti-Catholic fundamentalist separatist.
Link to Cat’s thread in Social Justice section
 
Just curious are you willing to give up meat in order to not be a stumbling block to Hindus and others who find the killing of animals offensive? How about changing your wardrobe to say, dresses and headcoverings, to avoid stumbling those who feel women should be covered and never wear pants like men? How about only going out in public in the company of a male relative in order not to offend those who find women out and about alone scandalous?
I would definitely modify my behavior when I am with others who are likely to be offended by my normal behavior.

E.g., last week I played organ at the Latin Mass parish in my city. I wore a dress (I only own two dresses), and I wore a veil.

I don’t happen to know anyone who considers a woman going out alone scandalous, but if I lived in a place where such people lived (e.g., the Amish?), I would follow their social convention.

As for the meat and Hindus–one of my friends is a Hindu from India, and she has no objection to meat and the killing of animals–just not the sacred cows. Hinduism is a huge religion that encompasses many beliefs–my friend tells me that it’s perfectly acceptable for Hindus to worship Jesus.

Here’s what I do–I take each Hindu friend’s preferences on an individual basis–if I am attending a function or a social affair, I ask–what should I wear? Is there something I should avoid eating, drinking, discussing? I try to not cause offense. From what I have seen of those who practice Hinduism, they are very accommodating and loving and are not easily offended.

I think we need to follow Mother Teresa’s example-when she lived in Calcutta, she lived as the native people lived. She wore what they wore, and ate very little.

I think it is a good thing to try to accommodate others. The Bible doesn’t teach us to be “true to ourselves”–I think that this teaching comes from Hollywood and secularism. (Right now, Chase Bank has a promotional campaign out about “just be you.”) The Bible teaches us to love one another, to the point where we are willing to give up our very lives for someone else.

As long as I am not being asked or expect to sin, I can accommodate others. It’s a way of demonstrating God’s love to them.

I think that there are people who can drink without harming themselves or others, and they SHOULD drink, because they provide others with an example of how God’s creation can be enjoyed without abuse.

When you think about it, all sin is simply of twisting or distortion of something that is good. E.g., sex was created by God and it is good when used in its proper context (marriage between a man and woman), but humans twist something good until it becomes sinful.

Same for alcohol. I concede that it was created by God (the process of fermentation), and when used properly (whatever that is), it is good. But so many people, especially in the U.S., misuse alcohol and then it becomes a sinful practice. For me, there is so much “twisting” of alcohol use and the results of that twisting are so very very devastating, that it is very difficult for me to see any good in it.

So if you can use alcohol without sinning, by all means do so, because it is a demonstration to a sinful world and to people like ME of God’s goodness, just like marriage is supposed to be a picture of Christ and His Church.
 
The law is not a determinant here. You keep on stressing “of age.” What has that got to do with anything? There are many reasons why no church should provide alcohol on its premises, the first being in 1 Cor 11:28-34
I mentioned 'of age" one time to my knowledge. I didn’t mean much by it, other than this is the guidelines in a circumstance of a beer tent.
“And if any man hunger, let him eat at home; that ye come not together unto condemnation. And the rest will I set in order when I come.”
This is an instruction from the Apostle towards the actual abuse of a Sacrament. We really can’t compare the celebration of the Eucharist in Mass to a festival. He makes no restrictions on the community freely choosing to drink alcohol, but those who are abusing the Lord’s supper. Remember, the passover meal Which Jesus shared during the Lord’s Supper required not one glass of wine, but three, I believe. There was alcohol consumption at the most holy Sacrament.
The second being that drivers should not be drinking alcohol at all, optimally.
Most places have an acceptable amount of alcohol you can consume and drive. No one is encouraged to drink too much and drive. The duration of a festival is plenty of time to wait after a few beers and drink water, or eat food and then be able to drive home in a safe and sober condition. Everyone keeps bringing out the possibility of abuse, when this is up to individuals to follow their moral conscience and friends to assist if someone has drank too much to drive. Is anyone posting against alcohol use in faith community events here claiming they have seen a number of abuses going on in their experience? I haven’t.
The third being that if you can’t do without alcohol, you’ve got a problem, whether personally or as a church.
So, you are demanding we give up drinking within legal and Church approved responsibility just to prove we don’t have a problem? You do not have that right, nor is it respectfull of other’s rights.
The fourth being, it sets a bad example to everyone else and encourages casual drinking.
Again, what gives you the right to say casual drinking is wrong? Jesus said He Himself came freely eating and drinking.
The fifth being, it is scandalous for single women on their own to be offered alcoholic drink by persons to whom they are not related or who are their guardians.
Who decided this rule? This is your tradition. It may be good, but not to impose or make judgement on others for not adhering to.
The sixth being that the church has got better things to do with its money than buy alcohol.
The Church makes profits from selling the alcohol, in order to support the festival. Monks sell craft beers to make a living.
The seventh being that there is no reason to drink alcohol on church premises, and what is not from faith, is sin.
You are going to an extreme that steps way outside biblical Teaching
 
The Church makes profits from selling the alcohol, in order to support the festival. Monks sell craft beers to make a living.
So do you think the festivals would not be supported if alcohol wasn’t available?
 
The fifth being, it is scandalous for single women on their own to be offered alcoholic drink by persons to whom they are not related or who are their guardians.
:confused: And where is the basis in scripture for this? Are you also going to argue that it is scandalous for women to go into bars without a male member of their family there to act as a chaperone? Are groups of female friends who go out together to enjoy a couple of drinks also causing scandal?
 
The law is not a determinant here. You keep on stressing “of age.” What has that got to do with anything? There are many reasons why no church should provide alcohol on its premises, the first being in 1 Cor 11:28-34

“And if any man hunger, let him eat at home; that ye come not together unto condemnation. And the rest will I set in order when I come.”
So the church shouldn’t provide food? What?
The second being that drivers should not be drinking alcohol at all, optimally.
Then lets ban parking lots and increase bike racks.
The third being that if you can’t do without alcohol, you’ve got a problem, whether personally or as a church.
Of course. If you can’t control yourself around alcohol, women, food, tv, money, and other addictions, you’ve got a problem.
The fourth being, it sets a bad example to everyone else and encourages casual drinking.
What’s wrong with casual drinking?
The fifth being, it is scandalous for single women on their own to be offered alcoholic drink by persons to whom they are not related or who are their guardians.
How so?
The sixth being that the church has got better things to do with its money than buy alcohol.
The church should also forgo buying vehicles (can cause accident), trimming the grass (waste), buying coffee (waste), upgrading the building (what for), and more.
The seventh being that there is no reason to drink alcohol on church premises, and what is not from faith, is sin.
There were a few reasons given: fundraiser, casual setting, fine enjoyment for adults, etc.

I personally prefer that women cover their heads in Church, men cover their arms and lower extremities, the priest wear a zuchetto or other headgear, the kids all sit quietly except to pray out loud, the music be a capella and according to Tradition, that there were no pews, that all the hours were recited publically, that the building were open 24/7, that protestants were all baptized at least conditionally when entering the Church, that the Orthodox and we were in Full Communion, that protestantism did not exist and everyone were Catholic and much more – I find it scandalous that it isn’t this way, please everyone, stop scandalizing me.👍
 
So do you think the festivals would not be supported if alcohol wasn’t available?
Im sure there would be ways, yes. I was answering the statement that the Church has better things to spend its money on than beer. It actually raises more money. The festival is made better. They can also use the money to hire a band. 👍
 
Just want to make sure you understand that none of these churches/denominations are “Evangelical Protestant.” That’s the group that I spent the first 47 years of my life with, and therefore, feel fairly comfortable commenting on in response to the OP’s query.
I think you are incorrect, Protestantism is a mixed bag, no two alike. The one church you were with may be complete opposite of another and both call themselves “evangelical”, “protestant” and/or anything else:
Oktoberfest at the United Evangelical Church of Canton
Sunday, Oct. 27, 12-5 p.m., Dillon St., 3200 block
If you miss the Breath of God Oktoberfest, an equally fun and family-oriented festival will be held two weeks later and 0.7 miles due south. The 3200 block of Dillon St.—from Bouldin St. to East Ave.—is closed to traffic, and to accommodate a stage at one end of the street and a beer garden at the other.
The beer garden will feature Beck’s Oktoberfest beer (of course), as well as Budweiser and Bud Lite. A full German spread—sour beef and dumplings, bratwurst, German potato salad, hot dogs, hamburgers and desserts—will ensure that non-drinkers get the full Deutsch experience as well.
A smattering of perennial festival activities—face painting, crafts tables, etc.—will keep all well occupied.
Heidi und Heimat Echo are providing musical entertainment.
Sissy Funk, council president at United Evangelical Church, said that the church’s first Oktoberfest celebration was meant to be a one-off party.
“Everybody was saying, ‘Are we going to do this next year?’” she said. “Now this is our sixth year.”
It’s also the church’s 140th anniversary. The United Evangelical Church, which was founded as Zion Evangelical Church in September 1873 and received the name the German United Evangelical Church later that year, is also doing 140 good deeds this year to celebrate the milestone.
Although the church dropped the word “German” from its name in the 1930s, there are still many members of the congregation who are German, Funk said, including herself.
She added that the celebration is an event for the entire community, not just the church.
“It’s not about the church, but it is about the church,” she explained.
For more information, please call 410-276-0393.
Greenbelt Festival in England:
npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2013/11/03/242359207/5-things-you-might-not-have-known-about-god-and-beer

First Friday, Warsaw Community Church:
wccconnect.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/first-friday-may-3-2012/

Christ Community Church, Beer and Bible:
christcommunitylansing.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=45&Itemid=19

Kentwood Community Church:
kentwoodcommunitychurch.com/default.aspx?p=83955&beid=117989

The Plymouth Church: metrowestdailynews.com/article/20140326/News/140327067

Calvary Lutheran, Texas:
foxnews.com/us/2013/11/12/texas-church-attracts-new-followers-with-beer/

Meanwhile, this dude says “no alcohol please” at the church fest, but pulls shenanigans like this: wfaa.com/news/investigates/Prominent-Pastor-Linked-to-Luxury-83600192.html
 
I think you are incorrect, Protestantism is a mixed bag, no two alike. The one church you were with may be complete opposite of another and both call themselves “evangelical”, “protestant” and/or anything else:
I was not part of “one church.” Most Evangelical Protestants do some “church hopping,” and my husband and I were no exceptions.

I grew up in the Conference Baptist denomination and played piano for a United Brethren Church (and attended United Brethren summer camp), and from there went to college and was part of the Christian church/Church of Christ/Disciples of Christ (Campbellites), then moved south and joined a Southern Baptist Church for two years, then quit that church and joined a Christian and Missionary Alliance (C and MA) Church for ten years, then moved back up north and tried to start a C and MA church (failed), went to a Reformed Church in America (which is NOT considered “Evangelical”), and then tried my childhood Conference Baptist Church, and then quit in disgust to attend an Evangelical Free Church in America for the last 7 years of our Protestant lives.

My husband grew up in the Assemblies of God, and since we started dating as young teens, I spent quite a bit of time in his church, too.

So I’ve been around the Evangelical Protestant world in many different denominations.

In the U.S., “Evangelical Protestant” refers to a movement that encompasses certain churches who have aligned themselves with that movement.

The churches that you listed are NOT considered Evangelical Protestant, and they would tell you in no uncertain terms that they are most definitely NOT and never will be part of the Evangelical Protestant movement! They would say that they are “evangelical” in their ministry, in the sense that they are preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ. But they are not part of the Evangelical movement, and they have nothing to do with the National Association of Evangelicals.

Check out this list of churches/denominations who are members of the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE): nae.net/membership/current-members
Meanwhile, this dude says “no alcohol please” at the church fest, but pulls shenanigans like this: wfaa.com/news/investigates/Prominent-Pastor-Linked-to-Luxury-83600192.html
Now some of the churches in this list would be considered “Evangelical Protestant.” As I said, there are signs that Evangelical Protestants are relaxing their stance against alcohol. I’m not surprised to hear that the Willowcreek organization is behind the Christ Community Church in Lansing–this is a huge megachurch organization (twenty thousand “seekers” every Sunday, and the actual “members” attend church throughout the week, not on Sunday). They are headquartered in wealthy Barrington, IL, a Chicago suburb. The message of abstinence would not be appealing to the people in that area of Chicago.
 
I would definitely modify my behavior when I am with others who are likely to be offended by my normal behavior.

E.g., last week I played organ at the Latin Mass parish in my city. I wore a dress (I only own two dresses), and I wore a veil.

I don’t happen to know anyone who considers a woman going out alone scandalous, but if I lived in a place where such people lived (e.g., the Amish?), I would follow their social convention.

As for the meat and Hindus–one of my friends is a Hindu from India, and she has no objection to meat and the killing of animals–just not the sacred cows. Hinduism is a huge religion that encompasses many beliefs–my friend tells me that it’s perfectly acceptable for Hindus to worship Jesus.

Here’s what I do–I take each Hindu friend’s preferences on an individual basis–if I am attending a function or a social affair, I ask–what should I wear? Is there something I should avoid eating, drinking, discussing? I try to not cause offense. From what I have seen of those who practice Hinduism, they are very accommodating and loving and are not easily offended.

I think we need to follow Mother Teresa’s example-when she lived in Calcutta, she lived as the native people lived. She wore what they wore, and ate very little.

I think it is a good thing to try to accommodate others. The Bible doesn’t teach us to be “true to ourselves”–I think that this teaching comes from Hollywood and secularism. (Right now, Chase Bank has a promotional campaign out about “just be you.”) The Bible teaches us to love one another, to the point where we are willing to give up our very lives for someone else.

As long as I am not being asked or expect to sin, I can accommodate others. It’s a way of demonstrating God’s love to them.

I think that there are people who can drink without harming themselves or others, and they SHOULD drink, because they provide others with an example of how God’s creation can be enjoyed without abuse.

When you think about it, all sin is simply of twisting or distortion of something that is good. E.g., sex was created by God and it is good when used in its proper context (marriage between a man and woman), but humans twist something good until it becomes sinful.

Same for alcohol. I concede that it was created by God (the process of fermentation), and when used properly (whatever that is), it is good. But so many people, especially in the U.S., misuse alcohol and then it becomes a sinful practice. For me, there is so much “twisting” of alcohol use and the results of that twisting are so very very devastating, that it is very difficult for me to see any good in it.

So if you can use alcohol without sinning, by all means do so, because it is a demonstration to a sinful world and to people like ME of God’s goodness, just like marriage is supposed to be a picture of Christ and His Church.
Everything you describe when you talk about thinking of the other is when you attend their events you conform to their culture. What you and Bart have suggested through this thread is that Catholics conform their events to the possibility of offending others.

By the way I have know a few Hindus who never said anything about meat for months, but after knowing them and holding some longer conversations (ironically at a bar/restaurant) found they, underneath the well mannered ignoring of it, were very uncomfortable with the idea of eating meat.
 
Now some of the churches in this list would be considered “Evangelical Protestant.” As I said, there are signs that Evangelical Protestants are relaxing their stance against alcohol. I’m not surprised to hear that the Willowcreek organization is behind the Christ Community Church in Lansing–this is a huge megachurch organization (twenty thousand “seekers” every Sunday, and the actual “members” attend church throughout the week, not on Sunday). They are headquartered in wealthy Barrington, IL, a Chicago suburb. The message of abstinence would not be appealing to the people in that area of Chicago.
I lived in the Chicago northwestern suburbs for years, Barrington is is a NW burb, and were plenty of people who abstained from alcohol, not all for moral reasons. Growing up there I don’t remember ever seeing any of the moms in the neighborhood drinking alcohol at any of the neighborhood get-togethers. Not all of the dad’s were drinking either. In high school I had a few friends who attended churches that forbid alcohol. Over all the area is no more or less amenable to abstinence than any other large metropolitan area.
 
Now some of the churches in this list would be considered “Evangelical Protestant.” As I said, there are signs that Evangelical Protestants are relaxing their stance against alcohol. I’m not surprised to hear that the Willowcreek organization is behind the Christ Community Church in Lansing–this is a huge megachurch organization (twenty thousand “seekers” every Sunday, and the actual “members” attend church throughout the week, not on Sunday). They are headquartered in wealthy Barrington, IL, a Chicago suburb. The message of abstinence would not be appealing to the people in that area of Chicago.
I thought Baptists were the staunchest anti-alcohol denomination around (the denomination, not individual members)… seems they can go to an event serving alcohol and publicize/perform/evangelize/whatever, but can’t host one??

delawareonline.com/story/news/local/2014/05/18/food-festival-fantastic-conclusion/9268395/

First Christian Church, Portland, Oregon, Disciples of Christ:
npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2013/11/03/242301642/to-stave-off-decline-churches-attract-new-members-with-beer

Campbellite on Beer:
stonedcampbelldisciple.com/2009/01/09/beer-the-bible-what-the-bible-really-says-about-it/

A very interesting perspective, One Big, Happy, Lie: Southern Baptists, Alcohol and Me:
internetmonk.com/archive/one-big-happy-lie-southern-baptists-alcohol-and-me
 
I thought Baptists were the staunchest anti-alcohol denomination around (the denomination, not individual members)… seems they can go to an event serving alcohol and publicize/perform/evangelize/whatever, but can’t host one??

delawareonline.com/story/news/local/2014/05/18/food-festival-fantastic-conclusion/9268395/
I see a big difference between a church hosting an event with alcohol and attending a non-church event where alcohol is present. I think the staunchest anti-alcohol denomination is the United Methodist denomination. Their social principles specifically condemn alcohol:

umc.org/what-we-believe/the-social-community#alcohol-drugs
 
I see a big difference between a church hosting an event with alcohol and attending a non-church event where alcohol is present. I think the staunchest anti-alcohol denomination is the United Methodist denomination. Their social principles specifically condemn alcohol:

umc.org/what-we-believe/the-social-community#alcohol-drugs
There’s the propaganda, and the reality:

events.jsonline.com/north_little_rock_ar/events/show/353594923-2nd-annual-arkansas-times-craft-beer-festival

[mounta(name removed by moderator)arkbeerfestival.com/](http://www.mounta(name removed by moderator)arkbeerfestival.com/)

jamestownnews.com/news/lifestyles/article_c366d674-e5c4-11e3-bf78-001a4bcf887a.html

greenportvillage.com/venue/greenport-united-methodist-church-624-main-street-market-lot-on-1st-street/

christumcdeerfield.org/events/event/123/wine-tasting-and-tasty-bites/2013-007-26

zvents.com/punta_gorda_fl/events/show/368500351-new-odyssey

Have any of these been booted or disciplined for ignoring the “strong stance”?
 
Do they serve alcohol on their church premises?
They are the hosts of the various Wine/Cheese, Beer festivals, and they sell tickets to it for money. Why does it matter whether its on their premises or a rented space?
 
They are the hosts of the various Wine/Cheese, Beer festivals, and they sell tickets to it for money. Why does it matter whether its on their premises or a rented space?
I agree. They are wrong if they are not listening to their church discipline. But there are some Methodists who perform gay marriages in violation of their church’s stance as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top