C
CWBetts
Guest
Luke 1:43Could you point us to the verse that says Mary was the Mother of God?
Luke 1:43Could you point us to the verse that says Mary was the Mother of God?
It is true that Mary was the vessel that God used to give our Lord Jesus a human body. But it is also true that Jesus could not die for our sins without that human body. And with a broken heart she stood by Him at the foot of the cross. We owe her our love, reverance and gratitude. To me, she is much more than a saint, she is the Mother of the Son of God and the Queen Mother of Heaven and earth.
Blessings, Kathy
what about John the Baptist?Full of grace in Greek is plaras charitos as used in John 1:14b pertaining to Jesus as He is the only sinless person in the world.
I believe that even though God chose Mary as His vessel to give us our Lord Jesus Christ in a human body, it does not mean God was dependent on Mary’s cooperation to fullfill His divine plan of redemption. Consider Jesus’s words about Sons of Abraham in the same line of thinking: IMO… I believe Mary would reject the title of Queen Mother of Heaven and earth, and she would point us soley to Jesus Chrsit, deflecting any attention given her which would have a tendency to take our focus and affection away from Jesus Christ.It is true that Mary was the vessel that God used to give our Lord Jesus a human body. But it is also true that Jesus could not die for our sins without that human body. And with a broken heart she stood by Him at the foot of the cross. We owe her our love, reverance and gratitude. To me, she is much more than a saint, she is the Mother of the Son of God and the Queen Mother of Heaven and earth.
Blessings, Kathy
No, Rick. She knew she was saved, but that does not make her a sinner. God redeemed her from the stain of original sin at the moment of conception. She chose not to sin, just as we are all to do. Anyone who thinks that God’s grace cannot lead us to a sinless life has a deficient understandingn of God’s plan for us.Probably explains why she said herself “my God my Savior”, but apparently you knew more than she did; how god-like of you![]()
maybe neither of the above speculations is true? Maybe you are neither unintelligent or spiritually prideful. Maybe you just are drinking too much before posting?Where does Scripture support any idea of having a earthly dead saint of angel to interceed for us before God?
This seems to be a rather condescending comment. FYI, intellect belongs to human beings, not to the Bible. Intellect functions to help us to understand the Bible, and when the intellect is not informed by the Apostolic Teaching as yours is not, then one will not properly interpret what one is reading.I’ll smoke a cigar:hey_bud: and eat some popcornwhile we all wait with great anticipation for your Biblical intellect to shine forth.
To the extent that we each contribute to the lack of unity in the Body,we are all guilty. And when the Body is fractured, it is between all of us. This idea that we are not members one of another is very detructive.Hi BornAgain89,
Don’t let anyone make you feel guilty for leaving the Catholic Church…that is between you and God and no one else.
It is even more sad that you are spreading this lie.Sad to say that they teach that you are not a Christian if you are not a Catholic
This is another lie that you are spreading.Also thay you will not go to Heaven if you are not a Catholic…not so. I am sure you will do the right thing.
Benn
It is not an “admission”, Rick, it is a hymn to God in thanksgiving for His Great Works. It is a confession of faith.Context, context and context, when did she make this admission?
This passage does not refer to “all humans”. Paul is making a comparison between Jews and Greeks, righteous, and unrighteous. He is saying that both groups contain faithless sinners. If you look at the Psalm from which this is quoted, it will become clear that it does not refer to “everyone”.Code:What did God say of all humans; fall what? short? Short of what? Gods glory? All have what? Sinned?
Mary is not a goddess, she is a creature. To say otherwise is a departure from the Catholic faith. If you think that the attributes of Mary are make her a “goddess” then you dont’ understand God’s plan for mankind.Is Mary a goddess as you make her out to be?
Yes, but what it says is not the same as how you interpret it. Read the Psalm from which the quote was taken, then we will talk.Rom. 23 for ***all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, ***"EXCEPT MARY", 24 being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus; Is this what it says?
No, Rick. You are adding words to the Scripture. Mary was saved from sn by Her Divine Son, just as we all are. The Apostle here is referring to original sin, not personal sin.Rom 5 -Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned– "EXCEPT MARY" 13 for until the Law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
I see that you have rewritten it, but it now fits with your obvious misunderstanding of what Catholics believe.Code:Do you see that I have rewritten Scripture; now it fits your understanding of God's word.
CAF is certainly more tolerant of those with different theology than CARM is of Catholics.Code:I heard about this website from someehre in one of these threads and it is very user-friendly and I found this. How true the letter is; I don't know.
Referring to the Mother of Jesus as “baggage” is one of the most disrespectful comments I have heard here on CAF, and I have heard a lot, I can tell you.Depending on how you meant that; that would like trying to agonize through the narrow gate with some baggage; it is difficult w/o any baggage and you’ll never fit through it till you drop all the baggage. Just a thought from the Word.![]()
This statement reflects several errors. One is the manner in which you interpret the passage about sin. Another is that God is the only one incapable of not sinning. God expects us all to live without sin. This is how He created us, and this is why He came to die for us. The notion to the contrary is a modern innovation of the Reformation.You do realize that the very God that you believe made Mary w/o the stain of is the same God that said all of sinned and fallen short; only God is incapable of not sinning.
No one said that Mary was incapable of sin. She chose not to sin, just as we are all to do.2nd_Adam said:Code:So either Mary is a goddess or she is a fallible human; this is what God has said.
We believe all that God has said.2nd_Adam said:So do you believe what God has said or do you pick and chose what you want to believe? If so; what do you think God has said about that? Spiritual Food for thought.
Why do you think Mary does not point us to Jesus? My devotion to Jesus has grown since growing closer to Mary. Love increases the capacity to love. The more I love Mary, all the more love I have for the Saviour.I believe that even though God chose Mary as His vessel to give us our Lord Jesus Christ in a human body, it does not mean God was dependent on Mary’s cooperation to fullfill His divine plan of redemption. Consider Jesus’s words about Sons of Abraham in the same line of thinking: IMO… I believe Mary would reject the title of Queen Mother of Heaven and earth, and she would point us soley to Jesus Chrsit, deflecting any attention given her which would have a tendency to take our focus and affection away from Jesus Christ.
Luke 3:8
Bear fruits in keeping with repentance. And do not begin to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ For I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children for Abraham.
Note pad is better. no codes.Thank you…I have repeated this answer so many times I feel like typing it up in a word document and doing a copy/past every time it gets brought up!![]()
No, Rick. You are misunderstanding both the scripture and what was said. Hebrews is written to believers. Believers who reject Christ are then left with nothing, since without Christ, there is no gate to heaven. We shouldn’t get into this here because it is off topic in this thread. Suffice to say that Mary never “crucified the Son of God afresh”, therefore it was not impossible to redeem her.For example, if you say Hebrews 6 is speaking to believers, then when they fall away it is IMPOSSIBLE to bring them to repetance again and you have created a new theology, which would be “lose it and your done”; the only other place that word, IMPOSSIBLE" is used is in reference to God not being able to lie. On the other hand, if you say it is speaking to unbelievers, then you have just contraditcted your point, which of course is what you did.
We read it differently, Rick. Catholics read scripture from the point of view from which it was written (Aposotlic). We see it differently because you are reading it from a perspective separated from Apostolic Teaching. Again, this is off topic in this thread. suffice to say that Mary was a elected, called, saved, and believed. She is not “baggage”.You will never find a reference to “believers”, the “called”, the “saved”, the “elect”, as “falling away”;
It is no new, Rick. We recognize that three of the four seeds sprouted. The faith was planted in them, and grew. You have misunderstood the parable of the seeds. However, that is off topic here also. Suffice to say that the seed of faith God planted in Mary grew, matured, and bore fruit.Code:it always refers to those like the first 3 soils in the parable of the sower; where they are exposed to varying degress of Truth and never had the right heart and walked away in unbelief; unless you believe the parable is about believers who have fallen away, which again would be new theology.
You are misunderstanding the use of the word “worship” Rick.Let’s see what your Chruch actually says, then you can take it up with the magisterium…fair enough?
There are several degrees of this worship:
I pray that you can receive this.Code:* if it is addressed directly to God, it is superior, absolute, supreme **worship**, or **worship **of adoration, or, according to the consecrated theological term, a **worship** of latria. **This sovereign **worship**** is due to God alone; addressed to a creature it would become idolatry.
You have misunderstood the teaching of the Church, Rick.newadvent.org/cathen/15710a.htm Just as there are “degrees of worship”; likewise there are “degrees of hell”.
No, Rick, it does not. She fed Him at her breast, changed His diapers, taught Him how to walk and talk, washed His clothes and his dirty hands and feet, taught Him piety and protected Him all His life. She accompanied Him through His ministry and right up to the foot of the cross. She was given to the Church by HIm, and remained with the Apostles serving the faithful until her days on earth were ended.Code:Everyone understands that Mary gave birth to Jesus. Guess what? It stops there.
Yes, I did know that. She had a blessing no one else ever has had, or ever will.Code:Mary is no more a saint than any of the other saints. God says in the OT there is a woman is the "most blessed among all women"; did you know that?
Choosing not to sin has nothing to do with the gift of infallibility. We are all expected to choose not to sin. the fact that we are falllible is what makes it necessary to choose the good!Code:If she is NOT a fallible human being, then she is just like Jesus, whom did not need a savior because He was infallible; therefore you make both Mary and God liars.
Yes, it is you we disagree with, Rick. We disagree with your interpretations of Scripture. We understand what is written differently.Code:It is not me that you are disagreeing with; it is the Word of God that you disagree with in favor of something else; it is the story of mankind. Many f us have shown you what God has said and what Mary has said, but you refuse to believe; that is your choice and you have made it.
God can save whoever He wants, however He likes. However, what makes you think that someone was saved without faith?Show me an exception to anyone who was saved apart from faith?
No. It would be your PERCEPTION that He changed. However, we can already clearly see that your perceptions have digressed markedly from what the Apostles believed and taught.Code:If God were to do what you claim He could do; then this would mean that God changes,
Rick, you are welcome here at CAF, but if you wish to engage in discussion with us, it is required that you respect our faith. That means that you refrain from calling our faith “lies”.Code:Which by the way, all the claims you have made about Mary does exactly that.
I can’t think of one. The exception here would be YOU. You are the one that does not believe His rule and authority does not exist in the Church He founded.Code:So show me the exception to His rule and authority?
I agree with you that Paul is addressing persons who have reached the age of accountability in this passage. It does not apply to those who have not attained it, or do not have the capacity to accept or reject. So, in essence, you are in agreement with the Catholic Church that the word "all " used in this passage does not mean “all” in the sense that it describes all of humanity. Clearly children and the diminshed intellectual capacity are not included as sinners.Code:On your other post where you mentioned about the age of accountability, mentally challenged and et al; Paul is speaking to those that have already obtained that age or has the mental capacity to accept or reject; that argument you tried to make is grasping at the straw-man.
No.Code:It is your Church teaching that told parents there infants, who were not following the Church law on infant baptism, were in "Limbo" for eternity, which is another doctrine not found in Scripture.
If they were that sad, they might have been motivated to baptize their children.Code:Like purgatory, Limbo is made to be a place or state that isn't that bad. Imagine how those parents must have been grieved by that; sad very sad.
John the Baptists parents never sinned while on earth unless you can find sin, walking in all the commandments.Context, context and context, when did she make this admission? What did God say of all humans; fall what? short? Short of what? Gods glory? All have what? Sinned? Is Mary a goddess as you make her out to be?
Rom. 23 for ***all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, ***"EXCEPT MARY", 24 being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus; Is this what it says?
6 And they were both just before God, walking in all the commandments and justifications of the Lord without blame.
**; and shall drink no wine nor strong drink: and he shall be filled with the Holy Ghost, even from his mother’s womb. *Luke 1: 13But the angel said to him: Fear not, Zachary, for thy prayer is heard; and thy wife Elizabeth shall bear thee a son, and thou shalt call his name John: 14 And thou shalt have joy and gladness, and many shall rejoice in his nativity. 15 For he shall be great before the Lord
Apoc 14: 2 And I heard a voice from heaven, as the noise of many waters, and as the voice of great thunder; and the voice which I heard, was as the voice of harpers, harping on their harps. 3 And they sung as it were a new canticle, before the throne, and before the four living creatures, and the ancients; and no man could say the canticle, but those hundred forty-four thousand, who were purchased from the earth. 4 These are they who were not defiled with women: for they are virgins. These follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were purchased from among men, the firstfruits to God and to the Lamb: 5 And in their mouth there was found no lie;
I recognize how you arrived at such a conclusion that Mary had other children. It is the same source where your misunderstandings of salvation emanate.Code:You can't even recognize the Lord had brothers; how will you understand the weighter things; like salvation?
Actually, what has no basis here is your conclusion that believers are not subject to apostasy. Don’t your realize that one cannot fall away from something to which they do not hold? Never mind. It is off topic here.If you would have said this is someone who sinned against the Holy Spirit or an apostate, then you would have stood on some ground,
Right!Code:Anyone can rationalize and explain away even what you own Church defines as worship and call it varying degrees, but it is not me you need to convince of your argument; it is God who judges what constitutes idolatry and what does not. If your Church is truly endowed by the Holy Spirit and is not subject to the consequences of fallibility, then you have no worries..right?
This is very true. You notice He did not go running after them, either, telling them they misunderstood.Don’t confuse the carnal with the spiritual like the poor folks in John 6 that walked away in unbelief partly because they took Him literally.
You seem to be laboring under the misunderstanding that devotion to the Blessed Mother subtracts from Christ. On the contrary, she bids us to follow Him as she has done. Her soul acts as a magnifier, enhancing all our devotion to Him.Matt. 6 - If then the light that is in you is darkness, how great is the darkness! 24 "No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and wealth.Code:I thought you might find this interesting as I was searching for uses of dulia and latria.
You are confusing veneration with the adoration that is due only to God. There is nothing wrong with honoring the work God has done in His saints.In both cases the word “douleuō” is used. Don’t focus on the “wealth” it is the “serve” that is in question. What I did notice is that the difference between the use of the two, generally is “rank, as in office or capacity” of the person with the exception I listed above. I did not look at all instances, but there is a definitive pattern. This helps me understand where the Catholic theologians make the differentiations, but nontheless it is a form of worship as I have clearly demonstrated form Catholic sources and it still remains that we do not worship (venerate) Mary or any other dead-on-earth saint.