Protestants and Mary

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adonia
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Question for Rick Holland, Bengoshi and Dokimas: when did your spirit rejoice in God and call Him your Savior? before or after you were saved?
 
Jesus has the same body now that he was born with friends, therefore Mary Indeed]! was the Mother of God. Jesus went through a lot of trouble to show us His risen body a promise that this would be us if we obeyed His commands spoken throughout the entire bible.
Mary from birth to death has pointed to Her Son in time of need. We are adopted sons and daughters of Mary, and Jesus decree on the cross when he turned to Mary and His disciple and said in; John 19: 25-27" When Jesus saw his mother, and the disciple whom he loved standing near, he said to his mother, “Woman, behold, your son!” Then he said to the disciple, “Behold, your mother!” And from that hour the disciple took her to his own home.

The Assumtion of Mary only reinforces the belief in being adopted sons of God, and of the ressurection, after all no matter how you cut the cake she was the spouse of the Holy Spirit, third person of the Triune God.
REV 12: 1, And a great portent appeared in heaven, a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars.

Peace and God Bless
onenow1:)
 
It is true that Mary was the vessel that God used to give our Lord Jesus a human body. But it is also true that Jesus could not die for our sins without that human body. And with a broken heart she stood by Him at the foot of the cross. We owe her our love, reverance and gratitude. To me, she is much more than a saint, she is the Mother of the Son of God and the Queen Mother of Heaven and earth.

Blessings, Kathy
👍
 
It is true that Mary was the vessel that God used to give our Lord Jesus a human body. But it is also true that Jesus could not die for our sins without that human body. And with a broken heart she stood by Him at the foot of the cross. We owe her our love, reverance and gratitude. To me, she is much more than a saint, she is the Mother of the Son of God and the Queen Mother of Heaven and earth.

Blessings, Kathy
I believe that even though God chose Mary as His vessel to give us our Lord Jesus Christ in a human body, it does not mean God was dependent on Mary’s cooperation to fullfill His divine plan of redemption. Consider Jesus’s words about Sons of Abraham in the same line of thinking: IMO… I believe Mary would reject the title of Queen Mother of Heaven and earth, and she would point us soley to Jesus Chrsit, deflecting any attention given her which would have a tendency to take our focus and affection away from Jesus Christ.

Luke 3:8

Bear fruits in keeping with repentance. And do not begin to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ For I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children for Abraham.
 
Probably explains why she said herself “my God my Savior”, but apparently you knew more than she did; how god-like of you 🙂
No, Rick. She knew she was saved, but that does not make her a sinner. God redeemed her from the stain of original sin at the moment of conception. She chose not to sin, just as we are all to do. Anyone who thinks that God’s grace cannot lead us to a sinless life has a deficient understandingn of God’s plan for us.
 
Where does Scripture support any idea of having a earthly dead saint of angel to interceed for us before God?
maybe neither of the above speculations is true? Maybe you are neither unintelligent or spiritually prideful. Maybe you just are drinking too much before posting?

There is no such thing as an “earthly dead saint”, so no, you won’t find any scriptural reference to this, or any other concepts that are simply a product of your imagination.

If you think that Saints and angels do not intercede for us before God, then you are not reading your scriptures.

However, if you think that those who die in Christ are not “alive forevermore” as He said they would be, there is really no point trying to have the discussion at all.
I’ll smoke a cigar:hey_bud: and eat some popcorn 🍿 while we all wait with great anticipation for your Biblical intellect to shine forth.
This seems to be a rather condescending comment. FYI, intellect belongs to human beings, not to the Bible. Intellect functions to help us to understand the Bible, and when the intellect is not informed by the Apostolic Teaching as yours is not, then one will not properly interpret what one is reading.
 
Hi BornAgain89,
Don’t let anyone make you feel guilty for leaving the Catholic Church…that is between you and God and no one else.
To the extent that we each contribute to the lack of unity in the Body,we are all guilty. And when the Body is fractured, it is between all of us. This idea that we are not members one of another is very detructive.
Sad to say that they teach that you are not a Christian if you are not a Catholic
It is even more sad that you are spreading this lie.

The Catholic Church does not teach this.
Also thay you will not go to Heaven if you are not a Catholic…not so. I am sure you will do the right thing.

Benn
This is another lie that you are spreading.

The Catholic Church does not teach this either.
 
Context, context and context, when did she make this admission?
It is not an “admission”, Rick, it is a hymn to God in thanksgiving for His Great Works. It is a confession of faith.
Code:
What did God say of all humans; fall what?  short?  Short of what?  Gods glory? All have what? Sinned?
This passage does not refer to “all humans”. Paul is making a comparison between Jews and Greeks, righteous, and unrighteous. He is saying that both groups contain faithless sinners. If you look at the Psalm from which this is quoted, it will become clear that it does not refer to “everyone”.
Is Mary a goddess as you make her out to be?
Mary is not a goddess, she is a creature. To say otherwise is a departure from the Catholic faith. If you think that the attributes of Mary are make her a “goddess” then you dont’ understand God’s plan for mankind.
Rom. 23 for ***all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, ***"EXCEPT MARY", 24 being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus; Is this what it says?
Yes, but what it says is not the same as how you interpret it. Read the Psalm from which the quote was taken, then we will talk.
Rom 5 -Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned"EXCEPT MARY" 13 for until the Law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
No, Rick. You are adding words to the Scripture. Mary was saved from sn by Her Divine Son, just as we all are. The Apostle here is referring to original sin, not personal sin.
Code:
Do you see that I have rewritten Scripture; now it fits your understanding of God's word.
I see that you have rewritten it, but it now fits with your obvious misunderstanding of what Catholics believe.
Code:
I heard about this website from someehre in one of these threads and it is very user-friendly and I found this.  How true the letter is; I don't know.
CAF is certainly more tolerant of those with different theology than CARM is of Catholics.
 
Depending on how you meant that; that would like trying to agonize through the narrow gate with some baggage; it is difficult w/o any baggage and you’ll never fit through it till you drop all the baggage. Just a thought from the Word. 🙂
Referring to the Mother of Jesus as “baggage” is one of the most disrespectful comments I have heard here on CAF, and I have heard a lot, I can tell you.

I can’t imagine that someone who claims to love Jesus would conceptualize HIs Mother in such a manner! Jesus is the Son of God, but He is also the Son of Mary! What man does not take offense when someone insults his mother!

Anyway, it is an inappropriate reference, as Mary is already through the gate that is narrow, and resides with her Kingly Son in eternity. She will be waiting for you on the other side, forgiving you for your ignorant and disrepectful expressions.
 
You do realize that the very God that you believe made Mary w/o the stain of is the same God that said all of sinned and fallen short; only God is incapable of not sinning.
This statement reflects several errors. One is the manner in which you interpret the passage about sin. Another is that God is the only one incapable of not sinning. God expects us all to live without sin. This is how He created us, and this is why He came to die for us. The notion to the contrary is a modern innovation of the Reformation.
2nd_Adam said:
Code:
 So either Mary is a goddess or she is a fallible human; this is what God has said.
No one said that Mary was incapable of sin. She chose not to sin, just as we are all to do.
2nd_Adam said:
So do you believe what God has said or do you pick and chose what you want to believe? If so; what do you think God has said about that? Spiritual Food for thought.
We believe all that God has said.

We do not agree with your interpretation of what He said.

Jesus appointed a teaching authority and instructed the disciples to settle their differences of this kind by taking it to the Church.
 
I believe that even though God chose Mary as His vessel to give us our Lord Jesus Christ in a human body, it does not mean God was dependent on Mary’s cooperation to fullfill His divine plan of redemption. Consider Jesus’s words about Sons of Abraham in the same line of thinking: IMO… I believe Mary would reject the title of Queen Mother of Heaven and earth, and she would point us soley to Jesus Chrsit, deflecting any attention given her which would have a tendency to take our focus and affection away from Jesus Christ.

Luke 3:8

Bear fruits in keeping with repentance. And do not begin to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ For I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children for Abraham.
Why do you think Mary does not point us to Jesus? My devotion to Jesus has grown since growing closer to Mary. Love increases the capacity to love. The more I love Mary, all the more love I have for the Saviour.
 
For example, if you say Hebrews 6 is speaking to believers, then when they fall away it is IMPOSSIBLE to bring them to repetance again and you have created a new theology, which would be “lose it and your done”; the only other place that word, IMPOSSIBLE" is used is in reference to God not being able to lie. On the other hand, if you say it is speaking to unbelievers, then you have just contraditcted your point, which of course is what you did.
No, Rick. You are misunderstanding both the scripture and what was said. Hebrews is written to believers. Believers who reject Christ are then left with nothing, since without Christ, there is no gate to heaven. We shouldn’t get into this here because it is off topic in this thread. Suffice to say that Mary never “crucified the Son of God afresh”, therefore it was not impossible to redeem her.😃
You will never find a reference to “believers”, the “called”, the “saved”, the “elect”, as “falling away”;
We read it differently, Rick. Catholics read scripture from the point of view from which it was written (Aposotlic). We see it differently because you are reading it from a perspective separated from Apostolic Teaching. Again, this is off topic in this thread. suffice to say that Mary was a elected, called, saved, and believed. She is not “baggage”.
Code:
it always refers to those like the first 3 soils in the parable of the sower; where they are exposed to varying degress of Truth and never had the right heart and walked away in unbelief; unless you believe the parable is about believers who have fallen away, which again would be new theology.
It is no new, Rick. We recognize that three of the four seeds sprouted. The faith was planted in them, and grew. You have misunderstood the parable of the seeds. However, that is off topic here also. Suffice to say that the seed of faith God planted in Mary grew, matured, and bore fruit. 👍
Let’s see what your Chruch actually says, then you can take it up with the magisterium…fair enough?
There are several degrees of this worship:
You are misunderstanding the use of the word “worship” Rick.

I agree, it is unfortunate that ancient Latin does not have the same meaning as modern English. Suffice to say that Catholics do not worship any creature, but God alone. I know when you read this, it does not seem that way to you, but it is because you misunderstand what you are reading.
Code:
 * if it is addressed directly to God, it is superior, absolute, supreme **worship**, or **worship **of adoration, or, according to the consecrated theological term, a **worship** of latria. **This sovereign **worship**** is due to God alone; addressed to a creature it would become idolatry.
I pray that you can receive this.

What is referred to as “indirect worship” is still directed toward God. We are recognizing Him in His creation,and honoring Him as God, through the things that have been made.
newadvent.org/cathen/15710a.htm Just as there are “degrees of worship”; likewise there are “degrees of hell”.
You have misunderstood the teaching of the Church, Rick. 🤷
 
Code:
Everyone understands that Mary gave birth to Jesus.  Guess what?  It stops there.
No, Rick, it does not. She fed Him at her breast, changed His diapers, taught Him how to walk and talk, washed His clothes and his dirty hands and feet, taught Him piety and protected Him all His life. She accompanied Him through His ministry and right up to the foot of the cross. She was given to the Church by HIm, and remained with the Apostles serving the faithful until her days on earth were ended.

Honestly, I think people who refer to His mother as “baggage” and say “she gave birth to him, and it stops there” are really reflecting a personal experience of their own mothers, and assuming all mothers are as deficient.
Code:
     Mary is no more a saint than any of the other saints.  God says in the OT there is a woman is the "most blessed among all women"; did you know that?
Yes, I did know that. She had a blessing no one else ever has had, or ever will.
It is her desire that we all become His saints. She is the mother of all who follow her son, and commands us all to “do whatever He tells you”.
Code:
   If she is NOT a fallible human being, then she is just like Jesus, whom did not need a savior because He was infallible; therefore you make both Mary and God liars.
Choosing not to sin has nothing to do with the gift of infallibility. We are all expected to choose not to sin. the fact that we are falllible is what makes it necessary to choose the good!
Code:
It is not me that you are disagreeing with; it is the Word of God that you disagree with in favor of something else; it is the story of mankind.  Many f us have shown you what God has said and what Mary has said, but you refuse to believe; that is your choice and you have made it.
Yes, it is you we disagree with, Rick. We disagree with your interpretations of Scripture. We understand what is written differently.
 
Show me an exception to anyone who was saved apart from faith?
God can save whoever He wants, however He likes. However, what makes you think that someone was saved without faith?
Code:
  If God were to do what you claim He could do; then this would mean that God changes,
No. It would be your PERCEPTION that He changed. However, we can already clearly see that your perceptions have digressed markedly from what the Apostles believed and taught.
Code:
 Which by the way, all the claims you have made about Mary does exactly that.
Rick, you are welcome here at CAF, but if you wish to engage in discussion with us, it is required that you respect our faith. That means that you refrain from calling our faith “lies”.

Anyway, a lie is a deliberate attempt to deceive someone. We sincerely believe, and want you to believe what the Apsotles taught about Mary. therefore, it is not a deliberate attempt to deceive ( a lie).
Code:
 So show me the exception to His rule and authority?
I can’t think of one. The exception here would be YOU. You are the one that does not believe His rule and authority does not exist in the Church He founded.
Code:
On your other post where you mentioned about the age of accountability, mentally challenged and et al; Paul is speaking to those that have already obtained that age or has the mental capacity to accept or reject; that argument you tried to make is grasping at the straw-man.
I agree with you that Paul is addressing persons who have reached the age of accountability in this passage. It does not apply to those who have not attained it, or do not have the capacity to accept or reject. So, in essence, you are in agreement with the Catholic Church that the word "all " used in this passage does not mean “all” in the sense that it describes all of humanity. Clearly children and the diminshed intellectual capacity are not included as sinners.
Code:
 It is your Church teaching that told parents there infants, who were not following the Church law on infant baptism, were in "Limbo" for eternity, which is another doctrine not found in Scripture.
No.
Code:
 Like purgatory, Limbo is made to be a place or state that isn't that bad.  Imagine how those parents must have been grieved by that; sad very sad.
If they were that sad, they might have been motivated to baptize their children. 😃

I don’t imagine they were any sadder that parents of baptized teens who throw away their inehitance.
 
Context, context and context, when did she make this admission? What did God say of all humans; fall what? short? Short of what? Gods glory? All have what? Sinned? Is Mary a goddess as you make her out to be?

Rom. 23 for ***all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, ***"EXCEPT MARY", 24 being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus; Is this what it says?
John the Baptists parents never sinned while on earth unless you can find sin, walking in all the commandments.

6 And they were both just before God, walking in all the commandments and justifications of the Lord without blame.

As was John the Baptist himself who was filled with the Holy Spirit, even in His mother’s womb. That’s quite the statement there if you ask me.

Luke 1: 13But the angel said to him: Fear not, Zachary, for thy prayer is heard; and thy wife Elizabeth shall bear thee a son, and thou shalt call his name John: 14 And thou shalt have joy and gladness, and many shall rejoice in his nativity. 15 For he shall be great before the Lord
**; and shall drink no wine nor strong drink: and he shall be filled with the Holy Ghost, even from his mother’s womb. *

Revelations tells us that one hundred forty-four thousand Virgins never had a spot on them and never uttered one lie.

Apoc 14: 2 And I heard a voice from heaven, as the noise of many waters, and as the voice of great thunder; and the voice which I heard, was as the voice of harpers, harping on their harps. 3 And they sung as it were a new canticle, before the throne, and before the four living creatures, and the ancients; and no man could say the canticle, but those hundred forty-four thousand, who were purchased from the earth. 4 These are they who were not defiled with women: for they are virgins. These follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were purchased from among men, the firstfruits to God and to the Lamb: 5 And in their mouth there was found no lie;
  • for they are without spot before the throne of God.
    **
 
Code:
You can't even recognize the Lord had brothers; how will you understand the weighter things; like salvation?
I recognize how you arrived at such a conclusion that Mary had other children. It is the same source where your misunderstandings of salvation emanate.
If you would have said this is someone who sinned against the Holy Spirit or an apostate, then you would have stood on some ground,
Actually, what has no basis here is your conclusion that believers are not subject to apostasy. Don’t your realize that one cannot fall away from something to which they do not hold? Never mind. It is off topic here.
Code:
Anyone can rationalize and explain away even what you own Church defines as worship and call it varying degrees, but it is not me you need to convince of your argument; it is God who judges what constitutes idolatry and what does not.  If your Church is truly endowed by the Holy Spirit and is not subject to the consequences of fallibility, then you have no worries..right?
Right! 👍

I do worry, though, about the extent of your misundersatndings,a nd the eternal consequences for those. I also am concerned by your inability to recieve the teaching of the church. Even if you chose not to agree, it is concerning that you cannot even try to understand what is taught.
Don’t confuse the carnal with the spiritual like the poor folks in John 6 that walked away in unbelief partly because they took Him literally.
This is very true. You notice He did not go running after them, either, telling them they misunderstood. 😉
Code:
I thought you might find this interesting as I was searching for uses of dulia and latria.
Matt. 6 - If then the light that is in you is darkness, how great is the darkness! 24 "No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and wealth.
You seem to be laboring under the misunderstanding that devotion to the Blessed Mother subtracts from Christ. On the contrary, she bids us to follow Him as she has done. Her soul acts as a magnifier, enhancing all our devotion to Him.
In both cases the word “douleuō” is used. Don’t focus on the “wealth” it is the “serve” that is in question. What I did notice is that the difference between the use of the two, generally is “rank, as in office or capacity” of the person with the exception I listed above. I did not look at all instances, but there is a definitive pattern. This helps me understand where the Catholic theologians make the differentiations, but nontheless it is a form of worship as I have clearly demonstrated form Catholic sources and it still remains that we do not worship (venerate) Mary or any other dead-on-earth saint.
You are confusing veneration with the adoration that is due only to God. There is nothing wrong with honoring the work God has done in His saints.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top