F
fbl9
Guest
and which perspective is that may we ask?..NO – except I’m even more confident in the reformed perspective
and which perspective is that may we ask?..NO – except I’m even more confident in the reformed perspective
reformedand which perspective is that may we ask?..
Joly Joe was referring to the concept of “implicit faith” I think.the Church’s teaching on baptism sates that baptism cause a regeneration in the soul-born again-…if you knew what baptism does for your soul why wouldn’t you do it??we are to be judged justly and not unfairly,so in all fairness cause one doesn’t do something they would have done if the knew they were to do it means they will be cast away?
Ever heard of the Counter-Revolution?reformed
I think at this point protestantism is a bit past the rebelling from Rome stage? The real center of the church of Christ – collective of all the faithful endowed with truth – is the Jerusalem above as Paul states.Ever heard of the Counter-Revolution?
Sure the Church needed reform but it was not necessary to leave the Church and start the beginning of hundreds and thousands of churches.
I have had arrguments with my husband but don’t leave. We kiss and make up!
I believe that we all - Church and the Body of Christ - need constant renewal. We have to keep checking ourselves and keep in check.
It is a constant battle.
That is why we Catholics need the Holy Father and the Magesterium. To teach, guide and keep us on the rails. Jesus’ idea of appointing Peter and the apostolic succession which emanated from the first apostles was a great idea. He knew we would need it.
:yup: :clapping: :dancing:
Peter is always listed first in the Bible… Christ established his Church (first mentioned his Church in scirpture) in St. Matthew 16;18 where he made Peter the earthly head of hte Church…I am not sure if he was ever in Rome, but the Scriptures do NOT portray him as the head of anything. That much is very plain. Yes, I am saying he was never a pope to begin with. See my proofs posted on another thread. They were, of course, criticized, but not refuted.
that is what i was saying …if one didn’t know they had to do something how could they be judged as if they knew…sola i guess i need to be more specific which “reformed” perspective are you talking about?is it the man made doctrine of the five solas,calvin taught this and he is just a man,not the church…faith alone was taught by just a man mr. luther,who was not the churchJoly Joe was referring to the concept of “implicit faith” I think.
I used to worry about my Father-in-saw’s soul. He was a beautiful, wonderful soul. He was an Angel - all the things a Christian should be - charitable, loving, kind, caring…on and on. However he didn’t believe in God and died that way.
At the time I was out of the Church and not giving God a thought.
When I came back that is when I began to feel concern about his soul. I also understood that living under a facist regime where the Church did not censure the regime led many to feel betrayed by the Church and would have nothing to do with it. So athiesm was prevalent.
Then one day I discovered the concept of “implicit Faith”. You believe without realising it - you don’t KNOW you believe. Since I believe all good comes from God my Father-in-law had to fit into that category. It was the Holy Spirit that was turning him into an Angel because he showed all the signs. Nobody could have been better - he was short of being a Saint - he did not perform any miracles.
Therefore I feel SURE that there are many people of other Faiths who do not know Jesus who will certainly be welcome into the Kingdom of Heaven.
I’m sure. It’s common sense
:yup: :yup: :clapping:
that’s the million dollar question…I am relatively new to these forums. You are so negative about the CC and yet I notice that you have been around for a year or so and have made 910 posts.
If the CC is just a bunch of lies why do you hang around? Beats me!
![]()
what kinds of things said on the forums caused you to come to that conclusion?, and I could not in good conscience pursue that path knowing that I cannot 100% conform to all practices, beliefs and doctrines…![]()
one only needs 100% of the doctrines,these are what are essential to salvation.practices may come and go,as for beleifs i am not sure what you are meaning.i don’t know every “beleif” but i learn what i can when i can…In answer to the original question yes, I have changed my mind as a direct result of these boards. Not being a very outgoing person it is hard for me to meet people in a church, or even approach a preist to chat about my questions. But since finding this forum I have been almost able to step into a situation similar to that and learn from the laity exactly what people believe and how they approach all different aspects.
My first thought was yay catholics seem friendly! My second thought was OH No… Clericalism. In fact the word clericalism wasn’t even a word in my vocabular before last night. I was reading posts about moral debate, and I was just turned off completely by the comabitve and abrasive attitudes of those people who consider themselves Serious Catholics. I am no one to judge others for their choices or actions, I myself make a million mistakes in one day that I need to confess to the Lord. But it seems quite uninviting to me. And I just hope and pray to Jesus that I am either able to find a welcoming place in the outside world or to find a verily sound moral church outside of RCC that I can grow in. I decided almost 70% in favor of not pursuing catholic communion as a result of the boards. I’m just not that hardcore and I am sure there are many who would condemn me as being not really catholic, and I could not in good conscience pursue that path knowing that I cannot 100% conform to all practices, beliefs and doctrines…![]()
You are right technically, and I am sure that Catholics by and large are less in your face at church than other Christians, if I was to skate by as a fairly politically moderate person but also adhere to church doctrine I am sure most people wouldn’t know the difference or find out… But just knowing that so many people are strictly adherent and intolerant of exceptions it makes me feel inherently guilty about things which I conscientiously believe which may not conflict in some cases, but may also not be generally acceptable.one only needs 100% of the doctrines,these are what are essential to salvation.practices may come and go,as for beleifs i am not sure what you are meaning.i don’t know every “beleif” but i learn what i can when i can…
I personally am not the kind of person who would throw the baby out with the bathwater entirely. I wouldn’t condemn the Church or any entity just because I found one or two rotten apples (people). And you are right about persecution, but I think there is always a level of that going back out again at the rest of the world. Two wrongs don’t make a right as my Dad always said.as stated elsewhere… sometimes people sound uncharitable but one should see what is behind that seeming attitude… Catholics are the most persecuted of all Crhistians… (If you don’t believe me, go around spouting pro-Catholic stuff randomly…). Anyway… Catholics are human and they get very tired of livin in an anti-Catholic world. so it is no wonder they have virutally no patience with all the goofy ideas Prot always put forth against the Chudch and wht (they think) she teaches.
I have sort of pretended, but you are right I can’t until I can.I wonder if you have ever put yourself in one of those Catholics’ shoes… but then, you couldn’t … unless you became Catholic yourself… or pretended to be… or what have you.
I am still learning, and I have my own personal habit of speaking loudly when I should very well just shut up.I have said things on this forum that i regretted… but i regretted them much later… like hours after posting or even the next day… i surprised myself that i said this or that… & repented to God… (even though what i have said doesn’t seem to take a cake to some of the other uncharitable stuff i have seen…)… Anyway, as you say yourself, we all make mistakes…
Our liturgy in the Lutheran church takes pretty much the same form as the Mass. I can’t think of any major departures except for intercessory prayer.Hi
Is there a thread on Protestant liturgy? I would be most interested to learn about this.
Please indicate how I can get on such a thread.
Thanks![]()
Your wrong !! EWTN Radio reports that 5000 0f 42,000 Catholic priest have been found guilty or are suspect of Child Molesting . That is about 11% and also only those cases reported. Also the Catholic Church has spent years trying to cover it up and Millons of dollars in Law suits. Those are the facts.Did you know that there is more child molestation in the protestant community… That it is actually twice as high as in the Catholic Church… ? Of course you didn’t know that… becaue you get your info from the Catholic - hating liberal media… they aren’t going to tell you that kind of thing… Or will they? I learned my info from them also… it just wasn’t on the front page of the newspaper… It never is… But when Catholics do something wrong, you can better believe it will broadcast into the outer reaches of the universe… ASAP.
Only 2% (somewhat less, actually) of priests are guilty of child molestation… What about the 98% + who are not?? And again, protestants are worse…(4%) & the in the general population, child molestation is 1 out of 4 for girls and 1 out of 6 for boys… 25-40%
11% … holy smokes? I never imagined the number was that high (actually I think the number is 12% or 11.9 to be exact if we divide 5K by 42K)? That equates to roughly one in eight priests. I just had a sinking feeling in my stomach.Your wrong !! EWTN Radio reports that 5000 0f 42,000 Catholic priest have been found guilty or are suspect of Child Molesting . That is about 11% and also only those cases reported. Also the Catholic Church has spent years trying to cover it up and Millons of dollars in Law suits. Those are the facts.
Does being suspect mean being accused? If so then I would say that being accused doesn’t mean being guilty. Now I know some are guilty and even if it were 99% I would stay for the 1% and pray for the rest… Priests are human and humans can fail, but the Church will prevail.Your wrong !! EWTN Radio reports that 5000 0f 42,000 Catholic priest have been found guilty or are suspect of Child Molesting . That is about 11% and also only those cases reported. Also the Catholic Church has spent years trying to cover it up and Millons of dollars in Law suits. Those are the facts.
Look I agree with you. I’m never one to throw stones… but 12%? Don’t you think that might give rise to reconsidering the celibacy requirement? Just a question.Does being suspect mean being accused? If so then I would say that being accused doesn’t mean being guilty. Now I know some are guilty and even if it were 99% I would stay for the 1% and pray for the rest… Priests are human and humans can fail, but the Church will prevail.
SD