C
ChosenAndCalled
Guest
I am a member of the Presbyterian Church in America. We’re five point Calvinists to most people, but it is closer to say we’re Augustinian in nature. I equate Augustine’s writings to something like the Constitution and the Calvin’s Institutes as something like the Federalist Papers.
Of note, I am not protestant – I am not protesting anything. I’m a member of the Reformed Faith. That’s how we refer to ourselves and what we believe. That may be a fine distinction to some of you here, but it is one I like to make clear. Just as Catholic’s may not like being called papists, I push back against protestant. It’s just mutual politeness, in the end.
One grand thing about being in the Reformed Faith is that we believe there is only one church – the universal, or catholic Church. All of God’s chosen and called are part of it. We also hold that the church is the only church ever founded; God founded it as He cast Adam and Eve out of the garden. He gave them a promise of a savior – Christ – and that was the cornerstone of His church.
So, my “church” isn’t 500 years old, or even 30. It’s been running along just fine since God started it. All of those who are given hearts of flesh for hearts of stone, made alive in Christ and redeemed are part of that church.
One poster said all “protestant” churchs are founded on some notion that an individual can find truth on his or her own. Far from it. My church holds to a set of teachings handed down shortly after the Reformation called the Westminster Confession of Faith. It was created in a similar way to Catholic councils – we believe it was created under the influence of the Holy Spirit. Now, being Reformed, we don’t hold that it is by nature infallible. We believe it to be true, but are open to the fact it may not. Having a personal “revelation” that it is not true is not acceptable, though. It would take a new council to amend it.
So, you “young un’s” whose church is only 2000 years old (it’s a jest, kind of a reverse tease at all the comments about the Catholic church’s age versus most non-Catholic churchs) are the new kids on the block as far as I’m concerned.
Of note, I am not protestant – I am not protesting anything. I’m a member of the Reformed Faith. That’s how we refer to ourselves and what we believe. That may be a fine distinction to some of you here, but it is one I like to make clear. Just as Catholic’s may not like being called papists, I push back against protestant. It’s just mutual politeness, in the end.
One grand thing about being in the Reformed Faith is that we believe there is only one church – the universal, or catholic Church. All of God’s chosen and called are part of it. We also hold that the church is the only church ever founded; God founded it as He cast Adam and Eve out of the garden. He gave them a promise of a savior – Christ – and that was the cornerstone of His church.
So, my “church” isn’t 500 years old, or even 30. It’s been running along just fine since God started it. All of those who are given hearts of flesh for hearts of stone, made alive in Christ and redeemed are part of that church.
One poster said all “protestant” churchs are founded on some notion that an individual can find truth on his or her own. Far from it. My church holds to a set of teachings handed down shortly after the Reformation called the Westminster Confession of Faith. It was created in a similar way to Catholic councils – we believe it was created under the influence of the Holy Spirit. Now, being Reformed, we don’t hold that it is by nature infallible. We believe it to be true, but are open to the fact it may not. Having a personal “revelation” that it is not true is not acceptable, though. It would take a new council to amend it.
So, you “young un’s” whose church is only 2000 years old (it’s a jest, kind of a reverse tease at all the comments about the Catholic church’s age versus most non-Catholic churchs) are the new kids on the block as far as I’m concerned.