CWBetts: Look at the pot, calling the kettle black, when it comes to ignorance

I mean, to actually interpret John 20:23, as saying that"we"(Christians) should confess our sins to a priest, instead of Our Holy Father(God), is ludicrous, to say the least! And I know that we are talking about Mary; but, when talking about prayer the “saints” are usually mentioned as well! Did you realize that the word saints, is mentioned 63 times in the NT? So, if Paul calls someone, or a group of people, “saints”, is this sacriligious? And I think it’s cool that Louie1983 is your cheerleader:thumbsup:By the way, saying that praying to or through Mary, is not unscriptural, can you cite any times, when our Saviour told us to pray through her? And, if I were a catholic, and chose not to confess to a priest, or pray through Mary, wore Levi’s to church, and didn’t “cross” myself, would I be excommunicated?
Letslook at what John 20:23 actually says. I will even use a faulty translation (KJV):
**21 Then said Jesus to them again, Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you.
22 And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost:
23 Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained. **
What happens here? Frist Jesus is talking to Peter an his Apostles (save Thomas, whao was absent). He breathe on them, filling them with the Holy Spirit. And He gives them the
power to forgive sins! There really isn’t any other way to inerperet the passage, but I digress. This is about Mary. No, of course it is not sacreligious when Paul refers to the Body of Christ as “saints”.
Paul tells us may times to “pray for one another”. How is this irreconcialble with asking the saints in heaven to pray for us? And No, Jesus never once tells us to pray through Mary, BUT neither is it forbidden! The prove my point of the scriptural nature of Praying through Mary, I will dissect the Hail Mary for you,
Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee.
This Luke 1:28, the very same greeting used by the angel.
Blessed art thou among women, and blessed it the fruit of thy womb, Jesus.
This is the greeting used by Elizabeth in Luke 1:42.
Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners, now and at the our of our death.
“Holy” means “set aside for a purpose”. Surely you can accept this is true of Mary! She was set aside for a very special purpose, that is, to bring the Savior into the world! I know that Protestants, as a general rule dislike the terminology “Mother of God”, but if you look again in the Elizabeth says something very interesting to Mary: “And whence is this to me,
that the mother of my Lord should come to me?” Did you catch that? “the mother of my Lord” Apparrently, calling Mary “Mother of God” is in the Scriptures! Remember I am nt using a “Catholic Translation”, but the revered, almost worshipped (in some circles) King James Version! Again, Paul urges us to pray for one another, so I cannot possibly see how the cloning phrase can be a source of consternation.
If you were a Catholic, and you:
chose not to confess to a priest: Mortal sins can only be forgiven in the sacrament of reconcilliation, so your soul would be in danger. Also, if you are concious of any unconfessed mortal sins, and you present yourself to recieve the Holy Eucharist, you commit sacrilege (another mortal sin).
did not participate in Marian devotions: You would not be sinning, but you would be missing out on part of the richness of the Christian faith.
wore Levi’s to church: Levi is a name in the Bible, so you would be fine. Wranglers are strictly forbidden, however!

The imprtant thing is that you attend Mass. Personally, I usually wear a jacket and tie, but that is just me. I think it shows a level of respect for our Lord. Many people choose not to. We should be neat, clean, and modest, but we don’t have a “dress code”.
cross yourself: I don’t see the issue that people have with this. As we cross ourselves, we say “in the name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit” Yet Protestants seem to get their dander up over this.
Excommuniction is a very serious matter. In the past it was overused. It has a single purpose: to bring people back into line with the Church. In my opinion (and this is all the following is, so do not take it by any means as official) it should be reserved for those offenses that cuse serious division or scandal within the Church, and therfore very rare, but it should not be abandoned. The things you mentioned are not nearly serious enough for excommunication, and some aren’t even sinful.
BTW when I used the term “ignorant” I meant no insult. I was merely stating that you were uninformed on what the Church truly teaches. However when you used it with me, I got the feeling that you were really trying to call me stupid, which I take offense at. At any rate, I do not feel that I am ignorant of ether what the Church, or of what Fundamentalists teach. I am a Catholic now, and read constantly to educate myslef on the teachings of the Church, and I used to be a Fundamentalist, and actually attended a Bible College for a year, so I know what they teach as well.