1
1beleevr
Guest
bcven86: Praise God, and my living Saviour; I get Living Water every day from the heart of my Lord!

bcven86: W-O-W! You said a mouthful.It sounds like youâre satisfied with your decision to become a catholic; although I have never understood infant baptism, you know, the need.Do babies know whatâs going on? Thank you for the invitation, but just like with the Mormons, too many things I canât agree with, least of all, the obligation to confess sins to a mere mortal man, and accepting the pope as the leader of all Christendom.1John 1:9, John tells us that if we confess our sins unto Him, He is faithful to forgive. Mary may not have been a perpetual virgin
Have you ever noticed, that when someone leaves ajob, school, or church, they almost immediately start badmouthing their formers? I donât bash or condemn, just disagree; which is taken as hate, or bashing by some
Anyway, bc, may the grace of our Holy Father(God) be upon you. Bless you my brother in Christ!!!
I was not defending my Church. Instead I was pointing out that the Catholic Church teaches from the Apostles and your non-denominational one does not. Can you really call your churchâs teaching on infant Baptism âChristianâ if it teaches contrary to the Apostles?bcven86: When someone says,âAre you saying that the catholic church does not do these things,â when I have not specifically targeted any church, or individual, thatâs screams sensitive!
How then, can I fill in the gaps? I presented a large set of evidence for the supporting the notion that infant Baptism is Apostolic teaching. The only way that the jury can still be out is if a) You present evidence that says the opposite and b) You tell me how I misinterpreted those early Church passages. Otherwise I would say that the jury is not out.The jury is still out on whether your argument is solid and sound:thumbsup:
sometimes life gives us crosses that we have to bear, and if one was in a sacramental marriage that was sound at the beginning and even tho there was infidelity later on, then the injured spouse would have to live a single, chaste life. otherwise they would be committing adultery. staying in Godâs good graces trumps human needs everytime. whether or not the human has the will do this is another story.. So no, in answer to your question, I would not tell anyone to practice immorality!Letâs say you werenât catholic, and a similar situation happened to you;your husband didnât want to make the marriage work. Would you just live a chaste single life?![]()
this is what i donât understand about church hopping, whether often or once or twice. what you have basically said is that you are not in the true church because there is the possiblity of you leaving this church. why would God send you there only to change is mind later and send you some place else. are you saying that God is wishy-washy?chewchoo: I didnât church hop too terribly much. There were what I would call PODS(Periods Of Darkness) where I fell away from God, and wandered,much like the Israelites, and was very spotty on church attendance. During these times, I was supporting my share of breweries and tobacco firms.As far as my present church home, I have no idea how long I will be there, but I know that God has plans for me, that He will reveal to me when the time is right!
:extrahappy: Yes, BCven! You hit the nail on the head!Iâm trying to offer it to you⌠You have had some, you can have more.
Okay, if itâs just a joke. I really thought you were serious.exoflare:Easy, grasshopper, you donât want to flame out! Besides I have other replies to get to, in order of precedence! So I didnât conveniently overlook yours, I just plain overlooked itJust kidding, hey what would life be like without humor? Any way, before you post, do you also consider the rocks and glass houses, or is this just directed at non-catholics? Iâm sure there probably are some former Christians, even may be some in this forum. My remark was a dig at those I have encountered in certain threads, who for whatever reason make it sound like"if you aint catholic, you aint nothinâ".
Except, of course, we want 1beleevr to do one final hop back Home!this is what i donât understand about church hopping, whether often or once or twice. what you have basically said is that you are not in the true church because there is the possiblity of you leaving this church. why would God send you there only to change is mind later and send you some place else. are you saying that God is wishy-washy?
God does not contradict himself. God may have plans for you , but church hopping is not one of them. Godâs truths are taught by the apostles and their disciples as BC has already stated many times in this thread.
Iâm not sure what being Catholic or not has to do with it. But if I was going to ignore Christâs teachings about His Church, then why would I care what He says about divorce?Letâs say you werenât catholic, and a similar situation happened to you;your husband didnât want to make the marriage work. Would you just live a chaste single life?![]()
I would add, however, that if you fully understood the power of chastity and the full value of what a marriage is you would not get remarried. i.e. it is the teaching that is compelling, not the fact that we have to follow it because the Church said so.Iâm not sure what being Catholic or not has to do with it. But if I was going to ignore Christâs teachings about His Church, then why would I care what He says about divorce?
Iâd do what I felt was right by my own authority.
Yes, you are correct.I would add, however, that if you fully understood the power of chastity and the full value of what a marriage is you would not get remarried. i.e. it is the teaching that is compelling, not the fact that we have to follow it because the Church said so.
This actually is important. Knowing that it was Apostolic teaching to Baptize infants could change for you what the act of Baptism actual is at its very root. This is one reason why I donât agree with the Protestant sola-fide doctrine. The apostles clearly showed that it wasnât the case because a baby canât express faith. Infant baptism has a lot of implications that affect a lot of different things.1beleevr, by what mechanism do you believe that infants are saved? But this salvation can be lost, right? That is, not every single soul thatâs created gets saved, so at some point this âinfantâ or âchildâ loses his salvation, yes?
How and when does he lose it? The first time he sins?
yes, thank you, thatâs what i was trying to get atExcept, of course, we want 1beleevr to do one final hop back Home!![]()
can you actually believe that some people leave âno nameâ churches because they have affairs with fellow choir members, and then they canât face the congregation any more, and then they just go start âfreshâ at another no name church where nobody knows their history.chewchoo: I wasnât sure if I provided the name of my"no-name church for you, but it is called: The Way Fellowship.And can you believe that some people actually leave churches, because of music or dress codes! Since I was raised in the 50âs&60âs, I grew up on old hymns, but have developed a passion for contemporary Christian music ie., Chris Tomlin, Mercy Me, Casting Crowns, Matt Redman. I was reading in 1 or 2nd Samuel about how the people rejoiced and worshipped God with cymbals, lyres, and trumpets; even dancing! How awesome, to have the freedom to sing, dance and praise our Heavenly Father:thumbsup:![]()