But, that’s exactly the point, though. God would depend on somebody because He became human. Therefore, He was entirely dependant on His Mother and step-father, but, especially His Mother the first, oh, let’s say 2 years of life. God growing up depended on His parents adequately taking care of Him.
God himself would not depend on anyone but God/Jesus would because he came as a infant. This is true with all infants and children, they for the first 2 years depent ofn their parents, so there is nothing special that was done.
We know that Jesus was tempted but He was tempted externally by the devil, that is, He didn’t have the voice within Him daring Him to disobey God. IF Mary was a sinner, She would have the devil, in a sense, inside Her. She would be tempted from within. IF the devil is inside Her, would Jesus be able to reside within Her? He would be so very completely at Her mercy (and indeed He was).
Yes he would be able to reside within her, He is God and without sin, reguardless if Mary did sin or was born with sin. So you are saying that Jesus would not be strong enough andGod would not protect his son because Mary sinned or was born with sin?
That is a good point. Thank you for bringing that to my attention.
There is another thing, let’s just say that She had a sinful body, that’s one thing, would She have been able to sin with God inside of Her? This is not taking into account Her first 12-13 years of life or life post-Nativity until dea…Her natural completion on this Earth.
She was born with original sin and like all of us has a sin nature even if God/Jesus was inside her.
How much do you know about her first 12-13 years of life?
What si there to say she didn’t sin during her first 12-13 years?
I MUST, in all good conscience, disagree. The Protoevangellium states that enmity will be between the woman and Her offspring. There are at least two people there who is the enemy of the snake. As I explained earlier, over 1000 years before the Reformation, when St. Jerome translated the Bible, the Bible the Church had, it was She because of the ipsa/ipsum disgression that we have She will do the crushing.
15 I will put enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: she shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel.
15 “She shall crush”… Ipsa, the woman; so divers of the fathers read this place, conformably to the Latin: others read it ipsum, viz., the seed. The sense is the same: for it is by her seed, Jesus Christ, that the woman crushes the serpent’s head.
www.drbo.org
I will put enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: she shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel.
inimicitias ponam inter te et mulierem et semen tuum et semen illius ipsa conteret caput tuum et tu insidiaberis calcaneo eius
latinvulgate.com/verse.aspx?t=0&b=1&c=3
No, if He was born of a sinless mother, He would be human. It is us who are less than human. God created man perfect, sans sin. That’s how humans should have been. We forfeited that to be less than what we should be.
What is this, “sinful flesh.” That doesn’t even make sense. If Jesus was in sinful flesh, He would be naturally sinful and have sin.
Where did St. Elizabeth say that?
Where does it say the annointed would be born of sinful humans in the Old Testament?