B
Bill_Pick
Guest
O MY you are going to have more luck proing the Pope is not Cathloic,say a whole lot of prays
alright david mark. thanks, found the post. lol! appreciate it.There were Sufís like Shah Nimatullah Valí in the 15th century, who wrote prophecies about Baha’u’llah similar to Isaiah or Ezekiel. Baha’u’llah influenced the Sufís, not the other way around.
Baha’i does come out of the Islamic matrix described in Revealtion chapter 12, and interpreted now, not by just anyone, but the appointed and inspired Interpreters, what we call the Central Figures of the Faith: The Báb (1819-1850) who was the Herald and Fore-runner of Bahá’u’lláh (1817-1892), and 'Abdu’l-Baha (1844-1921).
Here are a few links:
reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/SLH/slh-5.html Tablet to Pope Pius IX from Baha’u’llah
bahaiprayers.org/healing6.htm Long Healing Prayer
im sure the abraham moses and the rest of the prophets are glad to hear that. also clement ignatius, origen and augustine. none of which were baptist. lol! but thank you.Didn’t you know that everyone in heaven is a Baptist!
Thank God it only your opinion and we all know about opinion we all have oneIf you want my honest opinion, there isn’t anything you can say because it’s not exactly the truth.
Well, everything you have said here applies to the Catholic Church! that is why we see it that way. However, Peter did not start the Catholic Church, Jesus did. “Upon this Rock, i will build my Church”. Peter is a Rock, made Rocky by being grafted into Christ, the Rock of Ages. His confession is also a “rocky” statement, a firm foundation of faith. They are not separated.We need to look at the whole verse not just parts of it and in doing so I see no evidence of the Cathollic church as the “true church” or that Peter started the Catholic Church.
One might think that from a human point of view, but God sees the heart. He renamed Simon “Rock” because He intended to make Him rocky! All of the objects of the reference are accurate. Christ is The Rock, the statement is also, as is Peter, because Jesus says He is (not because he was acting like it all the time). God never renames a person without great import. He did not rename Simon into Cephas (Rock) just to hear Himself talk.In Matthew’s account 16 Jesus is talking about himself as the rock and Peter as the small stone. We also read later where Jesus tells Peter get thee behind me Satan. Now would you think Jesus would want Peter to be the leader of the church after that comment.
Hello Dizzy_dave,What is the quickest, easiest way to prove to a Baptist that the Catholic church is the true church Jesus Christ founded, and is still the true church?
Depends upon what you mean. If you mean your’s is no better than mine, nor the opinion of your church, I’d agree. If you mean the only opinion that counts is God’s and it is our priviledge to conform our opinions to His, again I agree.Thank God it only your opinion and we all know about opinion we all have one
Christ also stood on the authority of His word, He being the Word, which is the Water of Life. Peter tried to stand on this authority too, like a child learning to walk, and had a stumble or two. A similar thing happened when the Queen of Sheba visited Solomon, and thought his polished court was water…she lifted her hem so that it would not get wet.Christ is The Rock, the statement is also, as is Peter, because Jesus says He is (not because he was acting like it all the time). God never renames a person without great import. He did not rename Simon into Cephas (Rock) just to hear Himself talk.![]()
How can you prove the unprovable?What is the quickest, easiest way to prove to a Baptist that the Catholic church is the true church Jesus Christ founded, and is still the true church?
I,m very sorry what part of this did you not understand, I said nothing about a church,I was talking about your opinion,and your opinion ,and no one elseDepends upon what you mean. If you mean your’s is no better than mine, nor the opinion of your church, I’d agree. If you mean the only opinion that counts is God’s and it is our priviledge to conform our opinions to His, again I agree.
Originally Posted by Bill Pick
Thank God it only your opinion and we all know about opinion we all have one
Care to comment about your most recent statement in light of your earlier highlighted comment?I,m very sorry what part of this did you not understand, I said
nothing about a church,I was talking about your opinion,and your opinion ,and no one else
Yes most does apply to the Catholic church so really there is not much difference in beliefs on some issues. Although we agree on some issues we still worship differently and have some different beliefs. However, I disagree with the statement that Jesus started the Catholic church. Jesus started Christianity which is backed up in the Bible. I see no proof or evidence that he started the Catholic church. So now I’m confused on your beliefs because here on the Catholic Answers I have been told several times and I beleive by you also, but I could be wrong, that Peter started the Catholic church, so which is it Jesus or Peter???Well, everything you have said here applies to the Catholic Church! that is why we see it that way. However, Peter did not start the Catholic Church, Jesus did. “Upon this Rock, i will build my Church”. Peter is a Rock, made Rocky by being grafted into Christ, the Rock of Ages. His confession is also a “rocky” statement, a firm foundation of faith. They are not separated.
Jesus founded a visible ChurchYes most does apply to the Catholic church so really there is not much difference in beliefs on some issues. Although we agree on some issues we still worship differently and have some different beliefs. However, I disagree with the statement that Jesus started the Catholic church. Jesus started Christianity which is backed up in the Bible. I see no proof or evidence that he started the Catholic church. So now I’m confused on your beliefs because here on the Catholic Answers I have been told several times and I beleive by you also, but I could be wrong, that Peter started the Catholic church, so which is it Jesus or Peter???
Ok I see what you are trying to say. Now lets start from Matthew 16:13-20 This is when Peter says Jesus is the Messiah. This can also be found in Mark 8:27-30 and Luke 9:18-20.Jesus founded a visible Church
Adapted from “The Necessity of Being Catholic”
by James Akin
chnetwork.org/journals/nesschurch/ness_7.htm
The Church Jesus Christ founded is a visible communion. This is proven in Matthew 16:17-19, the passage in which Christ promised the gates of hell would never prevail against his Church (meaning that it would always exist). Several factors in the text show he was talking about a visible communion.
First, Jesus made Peter head of this Church (Matt. 16:18), yet Jesus was certainly not making Peter the head of an invisible Church. It is Christ’s own prerogative to be head of the invisible communion of Christians stretching from heaven to earth (Eph. 5:23). Therefore, he must have made Peter the head of a visible, earthly church. (We will not argue here that Jesus made Peter the head; even if one disagrees, the remaining arguments prove our case.)
Second, Jesus gave Peter the keys to the kingdom of heaven (Matt. 16:19), which are for use in Church government (compare Isa. 22:22 – the only Old Testament parallel to this verse). But one cannot govern an invisible communion of believers, only a visible one.
Third, Jesus gave Peter the power of binding and loosing (Matt. 16:19), which Matthew 18:17-18 indicates is used in Church discipline. But one cannot exercise Church discipline over an invisible body. Indeed, Matt. 18:17-18 refers it to public excommunication, in which an individual is treated by the church as “a gentile or a tax collector” (that is, as an unbeliever).
Fourth, Jesus explicitly stated that Peter would exercise the power of binding and loosing on earth. This shows his authority is an earthly one, over an earthly Church.
Fifth, Jesus promised the gates of hell would not prevail against his Church (Matt. 16:18), meaning that it would never perish. But it would be ridiculous to promise that an invisible Church would not pass out of existence since some of the Church’s members are in heaven and Christ’s heavenly Church cannot pass away by its very nature. Only a visible, earthly communion needs a promise that it will never perish.
There are thus abundant reasons to conclude that the Church Jesus was discussing in Matthew 16:17-19 was a visible communion of believers, and, since only the Catholic Church goes back that far, only it can be the one Christ founded.
siah 22:15-25 to get the full picture. Shebna, a high court steward or offical, was just as materialistic as the rest of the people in Jerusalem {22:13} He may have been in the group favoring an alliance with foreigners, thus ignoring Isaiah’s advice. The Lord revealed that Shebna would lose his position and be replaced by Eliakim {@@:20} Eliakim would be the “tent stake” driven firmly in place {22:23} Unfortunately Eliakim too would fall {22:25}
Still looking forward to a real explanation why the contradiction.
- POST #73
Bill, care to comment about your most recent statement in light of your earlier highlighted comment?
I do not understand any thing you are talking aboutif you enjoy talking to me that much PLEASE give me a post # and then I,l know what you are trying to say And what contracdiction are you talking about me saying a pray for you…Help me are stop posting to me I know you get confused easy…Be GoodStill looking forward to a real explanation why the contradiction.
I do not understand any thing you are talking aboutif you enjoy talking to me that much PLEASE give me a post # and then I,l know what you are trying to say And what contracdiction are you talking about me saying a pray for you…Help me are stop posting to me I know you get confused easy…Be Good
Are you deliberately not reading my total posts and them making wrong comments about what you think I’m referring to? You seem to me to be either dishonest with yourself or with your readers.
Maybe you’re trying to waste my time with your silliness. If so, I should wise up and ignore you. I’m not sure I’m able to wise up with regards to this, to my personal disappointment.
Just to continue playing your game look at post 73 as I indicated already./QUOTE
This is your post #73 and your problem is WHAT