S
Spacer
Guest
Please go and live without water.Not water alone.
Please go and live without water.Not water alone.
Please go live without heat:doh2:Please go and live without water.
I understand that but you posed the question if we could go on in the infinite expanding universe, my answer is yes. I was showing you facts.Please go live without heat:doh2:
Not the question being asked here.
There is more than one factor necessary for life.
I don’t understand string theory, apparantly. However, you brought up water on Mars. You then say something along the lines of there being life on Mars because there is water. Am I reading you wrong here?I understand that but you posed the question if we could go on in the infinite expanding universe, my answer is yes. I was showing you facts.
Please go and acquire a grasp of logic.Please go and live without water.
Patently false. H2O does not suddenly morph into life.Water produces life as we know it.
You are thinking to much into this to prove me wrong now. I said there was water on mars. I never said there was life, I said to have life you need water.I don’t understand string theory, apparantly. However, you brought up water on Mars. You then say something along the lines of there being life on Mars because there is water. Am I reading you wrong here?
No, you specifically said that water produces life.You are thinking to much into this to prove me wrong now. I said there was water on mars. I never said there was life, I said to have life you need water.
Do you know what evolution is? I’m guessing not. I have a fine sense of logic though, thanks for not noticing.Please go and acquire a grasp of logic.
I said that water alone does not generate life. That doesn’t imply that life can go on without water. Wow.
Patently false. H2O does not suddenly morph into life.
It does? Please try and grow something without water, I never said it alone produced life.No, you specifically said that water produces life.
:doh2:Do you know what evolution is? I’m guessing not. I have a fine sense of logic though, thanks for not noticing.
You think evolution is water turning into life? Go look up what living things are composed of, and then come back.Do you know what evolution is? I’m guessing not. I have a fine sense of logic though, thanks for not noticing.
The water sustains life, does not produce it. Put something dead in water and see if it comes to life.It does? Please try and grow something without water, I never said it alone produced life.
Apparently you don’t know what evolution is, nor do you know the principles on which it works. You do know that evolution just happens kind of like the theory of god. Water does have a small spark of electricity in it, I mean if you can believe in “god” who is to say that this is impossible.You think evolution is water turning into life? Go look up what living things are composed of, and then come back.
Wow, our school systems must really suck. If they’re going to teach evolution, at least they should teach it correctly. Water produces life… give me a break.
You’re ignorant. The scientific theory of the beginning of life has to do with “primordial soup” which is not water but rather amino acids in water. Thus it is not “electricity” in water becoming life, nor is it water itself becoming life.Apparently you don’t know what evolution is, nor do you know the principles on which it works. You do know that evolution just happens kind of like the theory of god. Water does have a small spark of electricity in it, I mean if you can believe in “god” who is to say that this is impossible.
Right, you’ve also successfully taken off topic of what my original post was about. You’ve also just been saying the same thing over and over again about water. I said, “Water produces life.” I’ve also said, “If you believe in god who is to say water can’t produce life.” Which in the same context you’ve tried to make me look like an idiot when you’ve done nothing to me but just talk about the basics of evolution.You’re ignorant. The scientific theory of the beginning of life has to do with “primordial soup” which is not water but rather amino acids in water. Thus it is not “electricity” in water becoming life, nor is it water itself becoming life.
You don’t know what evolution is, you don’t understand its principles, and you certainly are doing a fine job embarrassing yourself.
This is a waste of time, as you do not actually want answers but you simply want to argue. Good day to you.
I haven’t really tried to do anything, it’s all you. Really, I don’t even want to take credit for this one.Right, you’ve also successfully taken off topic of what my original post was about. You’ve also just been saying the same thing over and over again about water. I said, “Water produces life.” I’ve also said, “If you believe in god who is to say water can’t produce life.” Which in the same context you’ve tried to make me look like an idiot when you’ve done nothing to me but just talk about the basics of evolution.
The structure of an H2O molecule is such that it has two poles, one with a slight positive charge, and the other with a slight negative charge. It is this that causes water to be liquid at room temperature whereas ammonia, a similar molecule structurally, is a gas.Apparently you don’t know what evolution is, nor do you know the principles on which it works. You do know that evolution just happens kind of like the theory of god. Water does have a small spark of electricity in it, I mean if you can believe in “god” who is to say that this is impossible.