N
ncgolf
Guest
It is not a debate … .there can be no winner or loser like a contest but an honest explanation of how and why the Eucharist “is” is required. Catholics take Jesus at His word when He says “You must eat the flesh of the Son of Man”. John 6 is chock full of Jesus quoted, it contains no explanation of His words but just what He said.Ronald…I didnt know I was trying to debate anyone…I thought I was free to state what I believe just as you are. And no, I do not want to believe Jesus Christ is present in the Eucharist. I mean no disrespect, but this is one area we will agree to disagree on. I have never seen the word Eucharist in the Bible.
Mary’s response to the Angel’s revelation that she would conceive and bear a son …“How can this be?” is a legitimate response to a seemingly impossible occurance. This demands a response from the recipient of the revelation. It is either “It cannot be” and you walk away or much like Mary’s response “Let it be done according to your will.” Mary’s assent was one of I know it will be done even though right now I do not understand. She consented without full knowledge or understanding. There is a hint that in time she would come to understand. There is much similarity between these 2 occurances, both take us to events that do not normally occur naturally. Women don’t conceive on their own and bread and wine dont turn into flesh and blood. They go into places where only God can work and believing them takes us out of our normal comfort zones.
Your forum name of “Bible Believer” points to the fact that you believe what is in the Bible … it is hard then to for Catholics to reconcile what you say Jesus meant by His words versus what Jesus actually said. The Catholic belief is one that Jesus meant what He said (though seemingly impossible) and in time we would come to better understand the full impact of His words.